Abstract
To the Editor:
As Stolic et al. suggest, we agree there is increasing evidence that non-acute management of coronary heart disease by telephone in addition to standard medical care is a viable supplement or alternative to facility-based cardiac rehabilitation for patients with disease. Further, the relatively low cost of telephone-based interventions make them an attractive option to support patients and to deliver education in the early post-discharge period. Therefore, it is timely to consider the evidence supporting the use of telephone-based interventions by synthesising the current data.
As Stolic et al. suggest, we agree there is increasing evidence that non-acute management of coronary heart disease by telephone in addition to standard medical care is a viable supplement or alternative to facility-based cardiac rehabilitation for patients with disease. Further, the relatively low cost of telephone-based interventions make them an attractive option to support patients and to deliver education in the early post-discharge period. Therefore, it is timely to consider the evidence supporting the use of telephone-based interventions by synthesising the current data.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 70-71 |
Number of pages | 2 |
Journal | European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing |
Volume | 10 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Mar 2011 |
Externally published | Yes |