Non-Disclosure of Relevant Material and Chapter III: The Tantalising Promise of Due Process Rights Protection by the Australian Constitution in the Gageler High Court Using Separation of Powers Principles

Anthony Gray, Pauline Collins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This article considers a recent High Court decision that indicates a greater willingness to accord constitutional protection to fundamental due process rights such as the right to be heard and the right to confront accusers. There has been increased use of secretive processes whereby a person liable to be affected by a decision does not have the right to see, hear and test the evidence being led against them. The recent decision indicates the High Court may be prepared to take a tougher position against such measures. The article places these developments in the broader context of development of Chapter III jurisprudence in the past 30 years, with a particular focus on due process protection.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)93-122
Number of pages30
JournalAustralian Journal of Administrative Law
Volume31
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 11 Sept 2024

Cite this