Nomothetic methods of criminal profiling

Wayne A. Petherick, Brent Turvey

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterResearchpeer-review

Abstract

There are two ways of viewing the application of logic to the development of scientific knowledge (Novick, 1988, p. 34). The first takes the position that facts, appropriately shaped and organized, will divulge their intrinsic connections to each other. In this system of reasoning, such facts are assumed to be evident of inherent truths separate from the desires of those examining them. Further, in this system of reasoning, observations are considered the purest, most honest form of study. It is consequently believed that one should observe the facts and not poison their meaning with the construction of inductive hypotheses that go beyond the observable. The second view takes the position that science requires the imposition of our hypotheses and theories on the facts to give them meaning- that our speculations bring order to chaos.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationCriminal profiling
Subtitle of host publicationAn introduction to behavioural evidence analysis
EditorsBrent Turvey
Place of PublicationBoston
PublisherElsevier
Pages75-112
Number of pages38
Edition3rd
ISBN (Print)9780123741004
Publication statusPublished - 2008

Fingerprint

Profiling
Nomothetic
Scientific Knowledge
Imposition
Speculation
Intrinsic
Logic
Chaos
Poison

Cite this

Petherick, W. A., & Turvey, B. (2008). Nomothetic methods of criminal profiling. In B. Turvey (Ed.), Criminal profiling: An introduction to behavioural evidence analysis (3rd ed., pp. 75-112). Boston : Elsevier.
Petherick, Wayne A. ; Turvey, Brent. / Nomothetic methods of criminal profiling. Criminal profiling: An introduction to behavioural evidence analysis. editor / Brent Turvey. 3rd. ed. Boston : Elsevier, 2008. pp. 75-112
@inbook{b234d678fe8f4c39abe3d66360bb007c,
title = "Nomothetic methods of criminal profiling",
abstract = "There are two ways of viewing the application of logic to the development of scientific knowledge (Novick, 1988, p. 34). The first takes the position that facts, appropriately shaped and organized, will divulge their intrinsic connections to each other. In this system of reasoning, such facts are assumed to be evident of inherent truths separate from the desires of those examining them. Further, in this system of reasoning, observations are considered the purest, most honest form of study. It is consequently believed that one should observe the facts and not poison their meaning with the construction of inductive hypotheses that go beyond the observable. The second view takes the position that science requires the imposition of our hypotheses and theories on the facts to give them meaning- that our speculations bring order to chaos.",
author = "Petherick, {Wayne A.} and Brent Turvey",
year = "2008",
language = "English",
isbn = "9780123741004",
pages = "75--112",
editor = "Brent Turvey",
booktitle = "Criminal profiling",
publisher = "Elsevier",
address = "Netherlands",
edition = "3rd",

}

Petherick, WA & Turvey, B 2008, Nomothetic methods of criminal profiling. in B Turvey (ed.), Criminal profiling: An introduction to behavioural evidence analysis. 3rd edn, Elsevier, Boston , pp. 75-112.

Nomothetic methods of criminal profiling. / Petherick, Wayne A.; Turvey, Brent.

Criminal profiling: An introduction to behavioural evidence analysis. ed. / Brent Turvey. 3rd. ed. Boston : Elsevier, 2008. p. 75-112.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterResearchpeer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - Nomothetic methods of criminal profiling

AU - Petherick, Wayne A.

AU - Turvey, Brent

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - There are two ways of viewing the application of logic to the development of scientific knowledge (Novick, 1988, p. 34). The first takes the position that facts, appropriately shaped and organized, will divulge their intrinsic connections to each other. In this system of reasoning, such facts are assumed to be evident of inherent truths separate from the desires of those examining them. Further, in this system of reasoning, observations are considered the purest, most honest form of study. It is consequently believed that one should observe the facts and not poison their meaning with the construction of inductive hypotheses that go beyond the observable. The second view takes the position that science requires the imposition of our hypotheses and theories on the facts to give them meaning- that our speculations bring order to chaos.

AB - There are two ways of viewing the application of logic to the development of scientific knowledge (Novick, 1988, p. 34). The first takes the position that facts, appropriately shaped and organized, will divulge their intrinsic connections to each other. In this system of reasoning, such facts are assumed to be evident of inherent truths separate from the desires of those examining them. Further, in this system of reasoning, observations are considered the purest, most honest form of study. It is consequently believed that one should observe the facts and not poison their meaning with the construction of inductive hypotheses that go beyond the observable. The second view takes the position that science requires the imposition of our hypotheses and theories on the facts to give them meaning- that our speculations bring order to chaos.

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9780123741004

SP - 75

EP - 112

BT - Criminal profiling

A2 - Turvey, Brent

PB - Elsevier

CY - Boston

ER -

Petherick WA, Turvey B. Nomothetic methods of criminal profiling. In Turvey B, editor, Criminal profiling: An introduction to behavioural evidence analysis. 3rd ed. Boston : Elsevier. 2008. p. 75-112