TY - JOUR
T1 - No long-term weight maintenance effects of gelatin in a supra-sustained protein diet
AU - Hochstenbach-Waelen, A.
AU - Westerterp, K. R.
AU - Soenen, S.
AU - Westerterp-Plantenga, M. S.
PY - 2010/9/1
Y1 - 2010/9/1
N2 - In the short-term, gelatin showed stronger hunger suppression and less energy intake compared with other proteins. This study investigated if a supra-sustained gelatin-milk protein (GMP) diet improves weight maintenance (WM) compared with a sustained milk protein (SMP) diet and supra-sustained milk protein (SSMP) diet during a 4-months WM period after 8-week weight loss (WL) in sixty-five healthy subjects (28.6±3.4kg/m2; 44±10years). Absolute protein intake was kept constant (sustained) throughout per subject. Diets were: protein(P)/fat(F)/carbohydrate(C): 15/40/45% of energy (En%) (SMP) and 30/25/45 En% (SSMP or GMP) for weeks 9-16. Diets on weeks 17-24: P/F/C: 30/35/35 En% (SMP) and 60/5/35 En% (SSMP or GMP). From weeks 8 to 16, and weeks 16 to 24, changes in BMI were similar between the GMP (-0.4±0.6 and 0.3±0.7kg/m2 respectively), and the SMP (-0.7±0.9 and 0.1±0.7kg/m2 respectively) and SSMP (-0.6±0.6 and 0.3±0.6kg/m2 respectively) diets. Sparing of fat free mass (FFM): increases/decreases in FFM%/fat-mass% from weeks 8 to 16 were similar between the GMP and both control diets, and maintained from weeks 16 to 24. In conclusion, all 3 diets resulted in a successful WM period, while a GMP diet does not improve body weight maintenance and related variables after weight loss compared with a SMP and SSMP diet.
AB - In the short-term, gelatin showed stronger hunger suppression and less energy intake compared with other proteins. This study investigated if a supra-sustained gelatin-milk protein (GMP) diet improves weight maintenance (WM) compared with a sustained milk protein (SMP) diet and supra-sustained milk protein (SSMP) diet during a 4-months WM period after 8-week weight loss (WL) in sixty-five healthy subjects (28.6±3.4kg/m2; 44±10years). Absolute protein intake was kept constant (sustained) throughout per subject. Diets were: protein(P)/fat(F)/carbohydrate(C): 15/40/45% of energy (En%) (SMP) and 30/25/45 En% (SSMP or GMP) for weeks 9-16. Diets on weeks 17-24: P/F/C: 30/35/35 En% (SMP) and 60/5/35 En% (SSMP or GMP). From weeks 8 to 16, and weeks 16 to 24, changes in BMI were similar between the GMP (-0.4±0.6 and 0.3±0.7kg/m2 respectively), and the SMP (-0.7±0.9 and 0.1±0.7kg/m2 respectively) and SSMP (-0.6±0.6 and 0.3±0.6kg/m2 respectively) diets. Sparing of fat free mass (FFM): increases/decreases in FFM%/fat-mass% from weeks 8 to 16 were similar between the GMP and both control diets, and maintained from weeks 16 to 24. In conclusion, all 3 diets resulted in a successful WM period, while a GMP diet does not improve body weight maintenance and related variables after weight loss compared with a SMP and SSMP diet.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77955095683&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.physbeh.2010.05.005
DO - 10.1016/j.physbeh.2010.05.005
M3 - Article
C2 - 20457173
AN - SCOPUS:77955095683
SN - 0031-9384
VL - 101
SP - 237
EP - 244
JO - Physiology and Behavior
JF - Physiology and Behavior
IS - 2
ER -