New South Wales and Australian Capital Territory Researcher Development Program 2005-07: Modest investment, considerable outcomes

Helen E. Cameron, Frances T. Boreland, Jocelyn R. Morris, David M. Lyle, David A. Perkins, Parker J. Magin, Melanie J. Marshall, Nicholas A. Zwar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This evaluation of the Researcher Development Program (RDP) in NSW and ACT aimed to determine whether the RDP was effective in assisting novice researchers to undertake primary health care research. In mid-2008, 47 participants of the NSW and ACT RDP during 2005-07 were invited to participate in a postal survey. The survey included questions regarding previous research training and experience, outcomes during and after participation in the program, and organisational aspects of the program. Follow-up interviews were conducted with selected participants. Interview questions covered time in the program, supervision, organisational support and placement outcomes. Thirty-seven participants responded to the survey and 23 (62%) participants took part in the semi-structured interviews. Seventy-eight per cent of survey respondents felt that the RDP helped them move from novice to a more experienced researcher with effective supervision identified by participants as a key element in determining the success of the program. Many felt that time allocation was inadequate and 20% thought their capacity to maintain their workload was adversely affected by participating. Outcomes were considerable given the modest nature of the program. Notable outcomes were that most participants published their research and presented their research at a conference. Furthermore, one-fifth of survey respondents had enrolled in higher degrees. Several interviewees reported that their research led to changes in practice. Most respondents found the RDP valuable and considered that undertaking the program increased their research knowledge.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)59-67
Number of pages9
JournalAustralian Journal of Primary Health
Volume19
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 25 Feb 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Australian Capital Territory
New South Wales
Research Personnel
Research
Interviews
Surveys and Questionnaires
Health Services Research
Workload
Primary Health Care

Cite this

Cameron, Helen E. ; Boreland, Frances T. ; Morris, Jocelyn R. ; Lyle, David M. ; Perkins, David A. ; Magin, Parker J. ; Marshall, Melanie J. ; Zwar, Nicholas A. / New South Wales and Australian Capital Territory Researcher Development Program 2005-07 : Modest investment, considerable outcomes. In: Australian Journal of Primary Health. 2013 ; Vol. 19, No. 1. pp. 59-67.
@article{a14b1a7b639c4961939c27f4ccff6ef2,
title = "New South Wales and Australian Capital Territory Researcher Development Program 2005-07: Modest investment, considerable outcomes",
abstract = "This evaluation of the Researcher Development Program (RDP) in NSW and ACT aimed to determine whether the RDP was effective in assisting novice researchers to undertake primary health care research. In mid-2008, 47 participants of the NSW and ACT RDP during 2005-07 were invited to participate in a postal survey. The survey included questions regarding previous research training and experience, outcomes during and after participation in the program, and organisational aspects of the program. Follow-up interviews were conducted with selected participants. Interview questions covered time in the program, supervision, organisational support and placement outcomes. Thirty-seven participants responded to the survey and 23 (62{\%}) participants took part in the semi-structured interviews. Seventy-eight per cent of survey respondents felt that the RDP helped them move from novice to a more experienced researcher with effective supervision identified by participants as a key element in determining the success of the program. Many felt that time allocation was inadequate and 20{\%} thought their capacity to maintain their workload was adversely affected by participating. Outcomes were considerable given the modest nature of the program. Notable outcomes were that most participants published their research and presented their research at a conference. Furthermore, one-fifth of survey respondents had enrolled in higher degrees. Several interviewees reported that their research led to changes in practice. Most respondents found the RDP valuable and considered that undertaking the program increased their research knowledge.",
author = "Cameron, {Helen E.} and Boreland, {Frances T.} and Morris, {Jocelyn R.} and Lyle, {David M.} and Perkins, {David A.} and Magin, {Parker J.} and Marshall, {Melanie J.} and Zwar, {Nicholas A.}",
year = "2013",
month = "2",
day = "25",
doi = "10.1071/PY11155",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "59--67",
journal = "Australian Journal of Primary Health - Interchange",
issn = "1324-2296",
publisher = "CSIRO",
number = "1",

}

New South Wales and Australian Capital Territory Researcher Development Program 2005-07 : Modest investment, considerable outcomes. / Cameron, Helen E.; Boreland, Frances T.; Morris, Jocelyn R.; Lyle, David M.; Perkins, David A.; Magin, Parker J.; Marshall, Melanie J.; Zwar, Nicholas A.

In: Australian Journal of Primary Health, Vol. 19, No. 1, 25.02.2013, p. 59-67.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - New South Wales and Australian Capital Territory Researcher Development Program 2005-07

T2 - Modest investment, considerable outcomes

AU - Cameron, Helen E.

AU - Boreland, Frances T.

AU - Morris, Jocelyn R.

AU - Lyle, David M.

AU - Perkins, David A.

AU - Magin, Parker J.

AU - Marshall, Melanie J.

AU - Zwar, Nicholas A.

PY - 2013/2/25

Y1 - 2013/2/25

N2 - This evaluation of the Researcher Development Program (RDP) in NSW and ACT aimed to determine whether the RDP was effective in assisting novice researchers to undertake primary health care research. In mid-2008, 47 participants of the NSW and ACT RDP during 2005-07 were invited to participate in a postal survey. The survey included questions regarding previous research training and experience, outcomes during and after participation in the program, and organisational aspects of the program. Follow-up interviews were conducted with selected participants. Interview questions covered time in the program, supervision, organisational support and placement outcomes. Thirty-seven participants responded to the survey and 23 (62%) participants took part in the semi-structured interviews. Seventy-eight per cent of survey respondents felt that the RDP helped them move from novice to a more experienced researcher with effective supervision identified by participants as a key element in determining the success of the program. Many felt that time allocation was inadequate and 20% thought their capacity to maintain their workload was adversely affected by participating. Outcomes were considerable given the modest nature of the program. Notable outcomes were that most participants published their research and presented their research at a conference. Furthermore, one-fifth of survey respondents had enrolled in higher degrees. Several interviewees reported that their research led to changes in practice. Most respondents found the RDP valuable and considered that undertaking the program increased their research knowledge.

AB - This evaluation of the Researcher Development Program (RDP) in NSW and ACT aimed to determine whether the RDP was effective in assisting novice researchers to undertake primary health care research. In mid-2008, 47 participants of the NSW and ACT RDP during 2005-07 were invited to participate in a postal survey. The survey included questions regarding previous research training and experience, outcomes during and after participation in the program, and organisational aspects of the program. Follow-up interviews were conducted with selected participants. Interview questions covered time in the program, supervision, organisational support and placement outcomes. Thirty-seven participants responded to the survey and 23 (62%) participants took part in the semi-structured interviews. Seventy-eight per cent of survey respondents felt that the RDP helped them move from novice to a more experienced researcher with effective supervision identified by participants as a key element in determining the success of the program. Many felt that time allocation was inadequate and 20% thought their capacity to maintain their workload was adversely affected by participating. Outcomes were considerable given the modest nature of the program. Notable outcomes were that most participants published their research and presented their research at a conference. Furthermore, one-fifth of survey respondents had enrolled in higher degrees. Several interviewees reported that their research led to changes in practice. Most respondents found the RDP valuable and considered that undertaking the program increased their research knowledge.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84874102562&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1071/PY11155

DO - 10.1071/PY11155

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 59

EP - 67

JO - Australian Journal of Primary Health - Interchange

JF - Australian Journal of Primary Health - Interchange

SN - 1324-2296

IS - 1

ER -