Naming young offenders: Implications of research for reform

Jodie O'Leary

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

34 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Recently it was reported that Queensland’s Liberal National Party Government is considering proposing amendments to the State’s juvenile justice legislation to expand the ability to name recidivist young offenders. This article suggests that such a proposal does not align with the evidence regarding juvenile development and offending, and will be ineffective as a deterrent, as well as increasing stigmatising potential. The article considers whether the provisions on naming in other States and Territories are better aligned with the available evidence. It concludes that the approach taken in the majority of jurisdictions, which rests on a presumption against naming, should be considered best practice.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)377-389
Number of pages13
JournalCriminal Law Journal
Volume37
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

offender
repeat offender
reform
best practice
amendment
evidence
jurisdiction
justice
legislation
ability

Cite this

O'Leary, Jodie. / Naming young offenders : Implications of research for reform. In: Criminal Law Journal. 2013 ; Vol. 37, No. 1. pp. 377-389.
@article{7144b9ad4f5846668bcd10e95b13dbf4,
title = "Naming young offenders: Implications of research for reform",
abstract = "Recently it was reported that Queensland’s Liberal National Party Government is considering proposing amendments to the State’s juvenile justice legislation to expand the ability to name recidivist young offenders. This article suggests that such a proposal does not align with the evidence regarding juvenile development and offending, and will be ineffective as a deterrent, as well as increasing stigmatising potential. The article considers whether the provisions on naming in other States and Territories are better aligned with the available evidence. It concludes that the approach taken in the majority of jurisdictions, which rests on a presumption against naming, should be considered best practice.",
author = "Jodie O'Leary",
year = "2013",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "377--389",
journal = "Criminal Law Journal",
issn = "0314-1160",
publisher = "Lawbook Co.",
number = "1",

}

Naming young offenders : Implications of research for reform. / O'Leary, Jodie.

In: Criminal Law Journal, Vol. 37, No. 1, 2013, p. 377-389.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Naming young offenders

T2 - Implications of research for reform

AU - O'Leary, Jodie

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Recently it was reported that Queensland’s Liberal National Party Government is considering proposing amendments to the State’s juvenile justice legislation to expand the ability to name recidivist young offenders. This article suggests that such a proposal does not align with the evidence regarding juvenile development and offending, and will be ineffective as a deterrent, as well as increasing stigmatising potential. The article considers whether the provisions on naming in other States and Territories are better aligned with the available evidence. It concludes that the approach taken in the majority of jurisdictions, which rests on a presumption against naming, should be considered best practice.

AB - Recently it was reported that Queensland’s Liberal National Party Government is considering proposing amendments to the State’s juvenile justice legislation to expand the ability to name recidivist young offenders. This article suggests that such a proposal does not align with the evidence regarding juvenile development and offending, and will be ineffective as a deterrent, as well as increasing stigmatising potential. The article considers whether the provisions on naming in other States and Territories are better aligned with the available evidence. It concludes that the approach taken in the majority of jurisdictions, which rests on a presumption against naming, should be considered best practice.

M3 - Article

VL - 37

SP - 377

EP - 389

JO - Criminal Law Journal

JF - Criminal Law Journal

SN - 0314-1160

IS - 1

ER -