Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

n-3 PUFAs in cancer, surgery, and critical care: a systematic review on clinical effects, incorporation, and washout of oral or enteral compared with parenteral supplementation

  • Barbara S van der Meij
  • , Marian A E van Bokhorst-de van der Schueren
  • , Jacqueline A E Langius
  • , Ingeborg A Brouwer
  • , Paul A M van Leeuwen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: n-3 (omega-3) Fatty acids (FAs) may have beneficial effects in patients with cancer or in patients who undergo surgery or critical care.

OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to systematically review the effects of oral or enteral and parenteral n-3 FA supplementation on clinical outcomes and to describe the incorporation of n-3 FAs into phospholipids of plasma, blood cells, and mucosal tissue and the subsequent washout in these patients.

DESIGN: We investigated the supplementation of n-3 FAs in these patients by using a systematic literature review.

RESULTS: In cancer, the oral or enteral supplementation of n-3 FAs contributed to the maintenance of body weight and quality of life but not to survival. We did not find any studies on parenteral supplementation of n-3 FAs in cancer. In surgical oncology, we did not find any studies on enteral supplementation of n-3 FAs. However, postoperative parenteral supplementation in surgical oncology may reduce the length of a hospital stay. For general surgery, we did not find any studies on enteral supplementation of n-3 FAs, and evidence on parenteral supplementation was insufficient. In critical care, enteral supplementation of n-3 FAs had beneficial effects on clinical outcomes; evidence on parenteral supplementation in critical care was inconsistent. The incorporation of n-3 FAs in plasma and blood cells was slower with enteral supplementation (4-7 d) than with parenteral supplementation (1-3 d). The washout was 5-7 d.

CONCLUSIONS: This review shows the beneficial effects of n-3 FA supplementation in cancer, surgical oncology, and critical care patients. Supplementation in these specific patient populations could be considered with the route of administration taken into account.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1248-65
Number of pages18
JournalAmerican Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Volume94
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2011
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'n-3 PUFAs in cancer, surgery, and critical care: a systematic review on clinical effects, incorporation, and washout of oral or enteral compared with parenteral supplementation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
  • Oncology Nutrition Research

    Isenring, E. (Project Lead), Marshall, S. (Senior Research Fellow), Van der Meij, B. (Senior Research Fellow), Rigby, R. (Associate Investigator), Teleni, L. (HDR Student), Crichton, M. (HDR Student) & Tang, X. (Admin)

    1/01/14 → …

    Project: Research

Cite this