Motor imagery training improves balance and mobility outcomes in older adults: a systematic review

Vaughan Nicholson, Naomi Watts, Yannick Chani, Justin WL Keogh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

8 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Question: Does motor imagery training improve measures of balance, mobility and falls in older adults without a neurological condition? Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Participants: Adults aged at least 60 years and without a neurological condition. Intervention: Three or more sessions of motor imagery training. Outcome measures: The primary outcomes were balance measures (such as single leg stance and Berg Balance scale) and mobility measures (such as gait speed and the Timed Up and Go test). Falls were a secondary outcome measure. Risk of bias was evaluated using the PEDro Scale, and overall quality of evidence was assessed using the Grades of Research, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Results: Twelve trials including 356 participants were included in the systematic review and 10 trials (316 participants) were included in the meta-analyses. All trials included either apparently healthy participants or older adults after orthopaedic surgery. There was evidence that motor imagery training can significantly improve balance (SMD 1.03, 95% CI 0.25 to 1.82), gait speed (MD 0.13 m/s, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.22) and Timed Up and Go (MD 1.64 seconds, 95% CI 0.79 to 2.49) in older adults; however, the quality of evidence was very low to low. No data regarding falls were identified. Conclusion: Motor imagery training improves balance and mobility in older adults who do not have a neurological condition. These results suggest that motor imagery training could be an adjunct to standard physiotherapy care in older adults, although it is unclear whether or not the effects are clinically worthwhile. Trial registration: PROSPERO CRD42017069954.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)200-207
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Physiotherapy
Volume65
Issue number4
Early online date11 Sep 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2019

Fingerprint

Imagery (Psychotherapy)
Meta-Analysis
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Orthopedics
Leg
Healthy Volunteers
Randomized Controlled Trials
Research
Walking Speed

Cite this

Nicholson, Vaughan ; Watts, Naomi ; Chani, Yannick ; Keogh, Justin WL. / Motor imagery training improves balance and mobility outcomes in older adults : a systematic review. In: Journal of Physiotherapy. 2019 ; Vol. 65, No. 4. pp. 200-207.
@article{53069a48c406429cb05a8f2cc86a84f2,
title = "Motor imagery training improves balance and mobility outcomes in older adults: a systematic review",
abstract = "Question: Does motor imagery training improve measures of balance, mobility and falls in older adults without a neurological condition? Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Participants: Adults aged at least 60 years and without a neurological condition. Intervention: Three or more sessions of motor imagery training. Outcome measures: The primary outcomes were balance measures (such as single leg stance and Berg Balance scale) and mobility measures (such as gait speed and the Timed Up and Go test). Falls were a secondary outcome measure. Risk of bias was evaluated using the PEDro Scale, and overall quality of evidence was assessed using the Grades of Research, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Results: Twelve trials including 356 participants were included in the systematic review and 10 trials (316 participants) were included in the meta-analyses. All trials included either apparently healthy participants or older adults after orthopaedic surgery. There was evidence that motor imagery training can significantly improve balance (SMD 1.03, 95{\%} CI 0.25 to 1.82), gait speed (MD 0.13 m/s, 95{\%} CI 0.04 to 0.22) and Timed Up and Go (MD 1.64 seconds, 95{\%} CI 0.79 to 2.49) in older adults; however, the quality of evidence was very low to low. No data regarding falls were identified. Conclusion: Motor imagery training improves balance and mobility in older adults who do not have a neurological condition. These results suggest that motor imagery training could be an adjunct to standard physiotherapy care in older adults, although it is unclear whether or not the effects are clinically worthwhile. Trial registration: PROSPERO CRD42017069954.",
author = "Vaughan Nicholson and Naomi Watts and Yannick Chani and Keogh, {Justin WL}",
year = "2019",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jphys.2019.08.007",
language = "English",
volume = "65",
pages = "200--207",
journal = "Australian Journal of Physiotherapy",
issn = "0004-9514",
publisher = "Australian Physiotherapy Association",
number = "4",

}

Motor imagery training improves balance and mobility outcomes in older adults : a systematic review. / Nicholson, Vaughan; Watts, Naomi; Chani, Yannick; Keogh, Justin WL.

In: Journal of Physiotherapy, Vol. 65, No. 4, 01.10.2019, p. 200-207.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Motor imagery training improves balance and mobility outcomes in older adults

T2 - a systematic review

AU - Nicholson, Vaughan

AU - Watts, Naomi

AU - Chani, Yannick

AU - Keogh, Justin WL

PY - 2019/10/1

Y1 - 2019/10/1

N2 - Question: Does motor imagery training improve measures of balance, mobility and falls in older adults without a neurological condition? Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Participants: Adults aged at least 60 years and without a neurological condition. Intervention: Three or more sessions of motor imagery training. Outcome measures: The primary outcomes were balance measures (such as single leg stance and Berg Balance scale) and mobility measures (such as gait speed and the Timed Up and Go test). Falls were a secondary outcome measure. Risk of bias was evaluated using the PEDro Scale, and overall quality of evidence was assessed using the Grades of Research, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Results: Twelve trials including 356 participants were included in the systematic review and 10 trials (316 participants) were included in the meta-analyses. All trials included either apparently healthy participants or older adults after orthopaedic surgery. There was evidence that motor imagery training can significantly improve balance (SMD 1.03, 95% CI 0.25 to 1.82), gait speed (MD 0.13 m/s, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.22) and Timed Up and Go (MD 1.64 seconds, 95% CI 0.79 to 2.49) in older adults; however, the quality of evidence was very low to low. No data regarding falls were identified. Conclusion: Motor imagery training improves balance and mobility in older adults who do not have a neurological condition. These results suggest that motor imagery training could be an adjunct to standard physiotherapy care in older adults, although it is unclear whether or not the effects are clinically worthwhile. Trial registration: PROSPERO CRD42017069954.

AB - Question: Does motor imagery training improve measures of balance, mobility and falls in older adults without a neurological condition? Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Participants: Adults aged at least 60 years and without a neurological condition. Intervention: Three or more sessions of motor imagery training. Outcome measures: The primary outcomes were balance measures (such as single leg stance and Berg Balance scale) and mobility measures (such as gait speed and the Timed Up and Go test). Falls were a secondary outcome measure. Risk of bias was evaluated using the PEDro Scale, and overall quality of evidence was assessed using the Grades of Research, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Results: Twelve trials including 356 participants were included in the systematic review and 10 trials (316 participants) were included in the meta-analyses. All trials included either apparently healthy participants or older adults after orthopaedic surgery. There was evidence that motor imagery training can significantly improve balance (SMD 1.03, 95% CI 0.25 to 1.82), gait speed (MD 0.13 m/s, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.22) and Timed Up and Go (MD 1.64 seconds, 95% CI 0.79 to 2.49) in older adults; however, the quality of evidence was very low to low. No data regarding falls were identified. Conclusion: Motor imagery training improves balance and mobility in older adults who do not have a neurological condition. These results suggest that motor imagery training could be an adjunct to standard physiotherapy care in older adults, although it is unclear whether or not the effects are clinically worthwhile. Trial registration: PROSPERO CRD42017069954.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071978716&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jphys.2019.08.007

DO - 10.1016/j.jphys.2019.08.007

M3 - Article

VL - 65

SP - 200

EP - 207

JO - Australian Journal of Physiotherapy

JF - Australian Journal of Physiotherapy

SN - 0004-9514

IS - 4

ER -