Modeling firm heterogeneity in corporate social performance and financial performance

Lars E. Isaksson, Arch G. Woodside

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Prior research on the association between corporate social performance (CSP) and corporate financial performance (CFP) includes conflicting perspectives and inconclusive findings as to whether or not CSP has a positive, negative, or neutral association with CFP. While Wang's (2015) meta-analysis confirms the relationship between CSP and CFP to be significant and positive, in some contexts CSP and CFP associate negatively; CSP may need to receive "good management" support to yield positive financial outcomes (Luo & Bhattacharya, 2009). The study here tests and supports the perspective that "good management" occurs in configurations (i.e., business models) with high CSP to indicate high CFP. A configurational theoretical stance implies that recipes of bad management with high or low CSP are likely to associate with low CFP. Configurational analysis supports this theoretical perspective. Building from complexity theory, a configurational analysis includes the propositions that complex multiple recipes lead to the same outcome (equifinality tenet) whereby variables (ingredients) found to associate causally in one configuration may be absent in another recipe or even inversely related in a third recipe associated with this same outcome. The present study employs a mixed methods research design (using surveys of senior executives, independent CSP firm assessments using ESG factors (environment, social (or human rights), and governance), and analysis of corporate annual reports of 82 mostly highly-global Swedish firms). The study overcomes the mismatch between case-level theory proposals and variable-based data analyses that is widespread in the relevant literature. The study's findings support the core tenets of complexity theory.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3285-3314
Number of pages30
JournalJournal of Business Research
Volume69
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 2016

Fingerprint

Modeling
Corporate social performance
Financial performance
Firm heterogeneity
Corporate financial performance
Complexity theory
Corporate annual reports
Management support
Mixed methods research
Governance
Social environment
Human rights
Research design
Business model
Mismatch
Meta-analysis
Factors

Cite this

Isaksson, Lars E. ; Woodside, Arch G. / Modeling firm heterogeneity in corporate social performance and financial performance. In: Journal of Business Research. 2016 ; Vol. 69, No. 9. pp. 3285-3314.
@article{a0955bda2d9b4ee38a953afe5ebc40d2,
title = "Modeling firm heterogeneity in corporate social performance and financial performance",
abstract = "Prior research on the association between corporate social performance (CSP) and corporate financial performance (CFP) includes conflicting perspectives and inconclusive findings as to whether or not CSP has a positive, negative, or neutral association with CFP. While Wang's (2015) meta-analysis confirms the relationship between CSP and CFP to be significant and positive, in some contexts CSP and CFP associate negatively; CSP may need to receive {"}good management{"} support to yield positive financial outcomes (Luo & Bhattacharya, 2009). The study here tests and supports the perspective that {"}good management{"} occurs in configurations (i.e., business models) with high CSP to indicate high CFP. A configurational theoretical stance implies that recipes of bad management with high or low CSP are likely to associate with low CFP. Configurational analysis supports this theoretical perspective. Building from complexity theory, a configurational analysis includes the propositions that complex multiple recipes lead to the same outcome (equifinality tenet) whereby variables (ingredients) found to associate causally in one configuration may be absent in another recipe or even inversely related in a third recipe associated with this same outcome. The present study employs a mixed methods research design (using surveys of senior executives, independent CSP firm assessments using ESG factors (environment, social (or human rights), and governance), and analysis of corporate annual reports of 82 mostly highly-global Swedish firms). The study overcomes the mismatch between case-level theory proposals and variable-based data analyses that is widespread in the relevant literature. The study's findings support the core tenets of complexity theory.",
author = "Isaksson, {Lars E.} and Woodside, {Arch G.}",
year = "2016",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.02.021",
language = "English",
volume = "69",
pages = "3285--3314",
journal = "Journal of Business Research",
issn = "0148-2963",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "9",

}

Modeling firm heterogeneity in corporate social performance and financial performance. / Isaksson, Lars E.; Woodside, Arch G.

In: Journal of Business Research, Vol. 69, No. 9, 01.09.2016, p. 3285-3314.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Modeling firm heterogeneity in corporate social performance and financial performance

AU - Isaksson, Lars E.

AU - Woodside, Arch G.

PY - 2016/9/1

Y1 - 2016/9/1

N2 - Prior research on the association between corporate social performance (CSP) and corporate financial performance (CFP) includes conflicting perspectives and inconclusive findings as to whether or not CSP has a positive, negative, or neutral association with CFP. While Wang's (2015) meta-analysis confirms the relationship between CSP and CFP to be significant and positive, in some contexts CSP and CFP associate negatively; CSP may need to receive "good management" support to yield positive financial outcomes (Luo & Bhattacharya, 2009). The study here tests and supports the perspective that "good management" occurs in configurations (i.e., business models) with high CSP to indicate high CFP. A configurational theoretical stance implies that recipes of bad management with high or low CSP are likely to associate with low CFP. Configurational analysis supports this theoretical perspective. Building from complexity theory, a configurational analysis includes the propositions that complex multiple recipes lead to the same outcome (equifinality tenet) whereby variables (ingredients) found to associate causally in one configuration may be absent in another recipe or even inversely related in a third recipe associated with this same outcome. The present study employs a mixed methods research design (using surveys of senior executives, independent CSP firm assessments using ESG factors (environment, social (or human rights), and governance), and analysis of corporate annual reports of 82 mostly highly-global Swedish firms). The study overcomes the mismatch between case-level theory proposals and variable-based data analyses that is widespread in the relevant literature. The study's findings support the core tenets of complexity theory.

AB - Prior research on the association between corporate social performance (CSP) and corporate financial performance (CFP) includes conflicting perspectives and inconclusive findings as to whether or not CSP has a positive, negative, or neutral association with CFP. While Wang's (2015) meta-analysis confirms the relationship between CSP and CFP to be significant and positive, in some contexts CSP and CFP associate negatively; CSP may need to receive "good management" support to yield positive financial outcomes (Luo & Bhattacharya, 2009). The study here tests and supports the perspective that "good management" occurs in configurations (i.e., business models) with high CSP to indicate high CFP. A configurational theoretical stance implies that recipes of bad management with high or low CSP are likely to associate with low CFP. Configurational analysis supports this theoretical perspective. Building from complexity theory, a configurational analysis includes the propositions that complex multiple recipes lead to the same outcome (equifinality tenet) whereby variables (ingredients) found to associate causally in one configuration may be absent in another recipe or even inversely related in a third recipe associated with this same outcome. The present study employs a mixed methods research design (using surveys of senior executives, independent CSP firm assessments using ESG factors (environment, social (or human rights), and governance), and analysis of corporate annual reports of 82 mostly highly-global Swedish firms). The study overcomes the mismatch between case-level theory proposals and variable-based data analyses that is widespread in the relevant literature. The study's findings support the core tenets of complexity theory.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84961219430&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.02.021

DO - 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.02.021

M3 - Article

VL - 69

SP - 3285

EP - 3314

JO - Journal of Business Research

JF - Journal of Business Research

SN - 0148-2963

IS - 9

ER -