'Mitigation banks' for wetland conservation: A major success or an unmitigated disaster?

Shelley Burgin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

First developed in the USA in the early 1970s, 'wetland mitigation banks' provide a framework for conservation activities that are designed to offset residual, unavoidable damage to the natural environment caused by development activities. The concept is now a worldwide phenomenon. In this paper I consider the level of success of wetland mitigation banks in the USA for biodiversity conservation with a view to informing 'best practice' in Australia. I conclude that although the concept has merit, even in the USA where the processes have been evolving for over 30 years, the outcomes frequently fall short of the target of a 'like for like' swap of habitat. While the outcome for wetland mitigation may not be an 'unmitigated disaster' it is, at best, apparently only modestly successful.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)49-55
Number of pages7
JournalWetlands Ecology and Management
Volume18
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

wetland conservation
Wetlands
disasters
Disasters
disaster
wetlands
mitigation
wetland
Biodiversity
Practice Guidelines
Ecosystem
biodiversity
damage
habitat
habitats

Cite this

@article{a2d5078ae6074ceaae7f5ad2b31a4c44,
title = "'Mitigation banks' for wetland conservation: A major success or an unmitigated disaster?",
abstract = "First developed in the USA in the early 1970s, 'wetland mitigation banks' provide a framework for conservation activities that are designed to offset residual, unavoidable damage to the natural environment caused by development activities. The concept is now a worldwide phenomenon. In this paper I consider the level of success of wetland mitigation banks in the USA for biodiversity conservation with a view to informing 'best practice' in Australia. I conclude that although the concept has merit, even in the USA where the processes have been evolving for over 30 years, the outcomes frequently fall short of the target of a 'like for like' swap of habitat. While the outcome for wetland mitigation may not be an 'unmitigated disaster' it is, at best, apparently only modestly successful.",
author = "Shelley Burgin",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11273-009-9147-5",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "49--55",
journal = "Mangroves and Salt Marshes",
issn = "0923-4861",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "1",

}

'Mitigation banks' for wetland conservation : A major success or an unmitigated disaster? / Burgin, Shelley.

In: Wetlands Ecology and Management, Vol. 18, No. 1, 01.2010, p. 49-55.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - 'Mitigation banks' for wetland conservation

T2 - A major success or an unmitigated disaster?

AU - Burgin, Shelley

PY - 2010/1

Y1 - 2010/1

N2 - First developed in the USA in the early 1970s, 'wetland mitigation banks' provide a framework for conservation activities that are designed to offset residual, unavoidable damage to the natural environment caused by development activities. The concept is now a worldwide phenomenon. In this paper I consider the level of success of wetland mitigation banks in the USA for biodiversity conservation with a view to informing 'best practice' in Australia. I conclude that although the concept has merit, even in the USA where the processes have been evolving for over 30 years, the outcomes frequently fall short of the target of a 'like for like' swap of habitat. While the outcome for wetland mitigation may not be an 'unmitigated disaster' it is, at best, apparently only modestly successful.

AB - First developed in the USA in the early 1970s, 'wetland mitigation banks' provide a framework for conservation activities that are designed to offset residual, unavoidable damage to the natural environment caused by development activities. The concept is now a worldwide phenomenon. In this paper I consider the level of success of wetland mitigation banks in the USA for biodiversity conservation with a view to informing 'best practice' in Australia. I conclude that although the concept has merit, even in the USA where the processes have been evolving for over 30 years, the outcomes frequently fall short of the target of a 'like for like' swap of habitat. While the outcome for wetland mitigation may not be an 'unmitigated disaster' it is, at best, apparently only modestly successful.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=75549085277&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11273-009-9147-5

DO - 10.1007/s11273-009-9147-5

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 49

EP - 55

JO - Mangroves and Salt Marshes

JF - Mangroves and Salt Marshes

SN - 0923-4861

IS - 1

ER -