Mitigating ‘One-Size-Fits-All’ approaches to Australian agriculture: Is there a case to be made for Geographical Indications?

Jen A Cleary, William Van Caenegem

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Australia has been consistently opposed to extending Geographical Indications of Origin in Australian agriculture beyond their limited current application to wine. Such opposition has arisen largely because GIs have been viewed through the lens of international trade gains and losses and the subsequent contribution of these trade gains and losses to the collective wealth of the nation. GIs have not been considered in the Australian context for their potential to enhance the economic and social fabric of regional, rural and remote places, as has been the case in other nations. Such ‘rural enhancement’ considerations internationally, and particularly in Europe, have been an important part of the GI narrative. This chapter considers GIs in the Australian context from this perspective. We firstly outline the historical development of GIs and Australia’s response; and then provide an overview of Australian agricultural policy and operating environment that subsequently contextualizes two case studies. The first case study provides an in-depth look at the wine-GI experience and impact in Australia and the second provides a speculative analysis of the potential impact of GIs in a specific region. We conclude with insights into the ways in which GIs may well be contingently beneficial as tools for regional development in the Australian context.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe importance of place
Subtitle of host publicationGeographical indications as a tool for local and regional development
EditorsWilliam van Caenegem, Jen Cleary
PublisherSpringer
Pages111-145
Number of pages35
ISBN (Electronic)978-3-319-53073-4
ISBN (Print)978-3-319-53072-7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 28 Mar 2017

Publication series

NameIus Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice
PublisherSpringer International Publishing
Volume58
ISSN (Electronic)1534-6781

Fingerprint

agriculture
agricultural policy
international trade
regional development
economics
loss
wine
analysis
fabric
Europe

Cite this

Cleary, J. A., & Van Caenegem, W. (2017). Mitigating ‘One-Size-Fits-All’ approaches to Australian agriculture: Is there a case to be made for Geographical Indications? In W. van Caenegem, & J. Cleary (Eds.), The importance of place: Geographical indications as a tool for local and regional development (pp. 111-145). (Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice; Vol. 58). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53073-4_5
Cleary, Jen A ; Van Caenegem, William. / Mitigating ‘One-Size-Fits-All’ approaches to Australian agriculture : Is there a case to be made for Geographical Indications?. The importance of place: Geographical indications as a tool for local and regional development. editor / William van Caenegem ; Jen Cleary. Springer, 2017. pp. 111-145 (Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice).
@inbook{e8edf1ae47064d9f8717e0ccf7349d39,
title = "Mitigating ‘One-Size-Fits-All’ approaches to Australian agriculture: Is there a case to be made for Geographical Indications?",
abstract = "Australia has been consistently opposed to extending Geographical Indications of Origin in Australian agriculture beyond their limited current application to wine. Such opposition has arisen largely because GIs have been viewed through the lens of international trade gains and losses and the subsequent contribution of these trade gains and losses to the collective wealth of the nation. GIs have not been considered in the Australian context for their potential to enhance the economic and social fabric of regional, rural and remote places, as has been the case in other nations. Such ‘rural enhancement’ considerations internationally, and particularly in Europe, have been an important part of the GI narrative. This chapter considers GIs in the Australian context from this perspective. We firstly outline the historical development of GIs and Australia’s response; and then provide an overview of Australian agricultural policy and operating environment that subsequently contextualizes two case studies. The first case study provides an in-depth look at the wine-GI experience and impact in Australia and the second provides a speculative analysis of the potential impact of GIs in a specific region. We conclude with insights into the ways in which GIs may well be contingently beneficial as tools for regional development in the Australian context.",
author = "Cleary, {Jen A} and {Van Caenegem}, William",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "28",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-53073-4_5",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-3-319-53072-7",
series = "Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice",
publisher = "Springer",
pages = "111--145",
editor = "{van Caenegem}, {William } and Jen Cleary",
booktitle = "The importance of place",
address = "Germany",

}

Cleary, JA & Van Caenegem, W 2017, Mitigating ‘One-Size-Fits-All’ approaches to Australian agriculture: Is there a case to be made for Geographical Indications? in W van Caenegem & J Cleary (eds), The importance of place: Geographical indications as a tool for local and regional development. Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice, vol. 58, Springer, pp. 111-145. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53073-4_5

Mitigating ‘One-Size-Fits-All’ approaches to Australian agriculture : Is there a case to be made for Geographical Indications? / Cleary, Jen A; Van Caenegem, William.

The importance of place: Geographical indications as a tool for local and regional development. ed. / William van Caenegem; Jen Cleary. Springer, 2017. p. 111-145 (Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice; Vol. 58).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterResearchpeer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - Mitigating ‘One-Size-Fits-All’ approaches to Australian agriculture

T2 - Is there a case to be made for Geographical Indications?

AU - Cleary, Jen A

AU - Van Caenegem, William

PY - 2017/3/28

Y1 - 2017/3/28

N2 - Australia has been consistently opposed to extending Geographical Indications of Origin in Australian agriculture beyond their limited current application to wine. Such opposition has arisen largely because GIs have been viewed through the lens of international trade gains and losses and the subsequent contribution of these trade gains and losses to the collective wealth of the nation. GIs have not been considered in the Australian context for their potential to enhance the economic and social fabric of regional, rural and remote places, as has been the case in other nations. Such ‘rural enhancement’ considerations internationally, and particularly in Europe, have been an important part of the GI narrative. This chapter considers GIs in the Australian context from this perspective. We firstly outline the historical development of GIs and Australia’s response; and then provide an overview of Australian agricultural policy and operating environment that subsequently contextualizes two case studies. The first case study provides an in-depth look at the wine-GI experience and impact in Australia and the second provides a speculative analysis of the potential impact of GIs in a specific region. We conclude with insights into the ways in which GIs may well be contingently beneficial as tools for regional development in the Australian context.

AB - Australia has been consistently opposed to extending Geographical Indications of Origin in Australian agriculture beyond their limited current application to wine. Such opposition has arisen largely because GIs have been viewed through the lens of international trade gains and losses and the subsequent contribution of these trade gains and losses to the collective wealth of the nation. GIs have not been considered in the Australian context for their potential to enhance the economic and social fabric of regional, rural and remote places, as has been the case in other nations. Such ‘rural enhancement’ considerations internationally, and particularly in Europe, have been an important part of the GI narrative. This chapter considers GIs in the Australian context from this perspective. We firstly outline the historical development of GIs and Australia’s response; and then provide an overview of Australian agricultural policy and operating environment that subsequently contextualizes two case studies. The first case study provides an in-depth look at the wine-GI experience and impact in Australia and the second provides a speculative analysis of the potential impact of GIs in a specific region. We conclude with insights into the ways in which GIs may well be contingently beneficial as tools for regional development in the Australian context.

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-53073-4_5

DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-53073-4_5

M3 - Chapter

SN - 978-3-319-53072-7

T3 - Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice

SP - 111

EP - 145

BT - The importance of place

A2 - van Caenegem, William

A2 - Cleary, Jen

PB - Springer

ER -

Cleary JA, Van Caenegem W. Mitigating ‘One-Size-Fits-All’ approaches to Australian agriculture: Is there a case to be made for Geographical Indications? In van Caenegem W, Cleary J, editors, The importance of place: Geographical indications as a tool for local and regional development. Springer. 2017. p. 111-145. (Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53073-4_5