Missing the Gold Coast train: The interaction between private development and three levels of government planning in attempting to co locate a new railway station and a major new town centre

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Queensland’s Gold Coast was established as a collection of coastal tourist resorts by the late 19th century. Private development was stimulated in the conventional way, by State government provision of public transport. The main resort areas flourished due to easy public access via two railway lines from the State capital Brisbane. During the 20th century a much larger network of Gold Coast holiday resorts and retirement suburbs was created due to the greater mobility allowed by increasing car ownership. By the 1960s, the original Gold Coast railway lines were removed, with their corridors eventually being redeveloped for a mix of private development and publicly funded motorways. By the 1990s, the Gold Coast was well advanced in its transformation into a city region, as a major part of the rapidly urbanizing South East Queensland. In 1997, a new Gold Coast Railway was developed by the Queensland State Government, with funding assistance by the Commonwealth Government via its Building Better Cities program. This public investment in transport infrastructure coincided with the private development of a ‘master planned community’ at Robina, including a major town centre intended to become the Gold Coast’s second ‘CBD’.

This paper investigates the reasons for the Robina Railway Station being so isolated (one kilometer) from the Robina Town Centre, despite the two being planned, designed and developed simultaneously. The separation of the two – and the deviation from accepted planning principles – has received significant informal criticism, but there is currently no cohesive public explanation or critique available. Methods for the investigation include documentary research and key informant interviews. This research will have value in increasing the understanding of deviations between planning principles and development outcomes, and our understanding of the interactions between private and public planning (at three levels of government) in the creation of urban centres and transport nodes at the turn of the 21st century.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the International Planning History Society (IPHS) Conference
Subtitle of host publicationPublic versus private planning: themes, trends and tensions
EditorsC Silver
Place of PublicationFlorida/Chicago
PublisherUniversity of Florida
Pages367-77
Number of pages11
Publication statusPublished - 2008
EventInternational Planning History Society (IPHS) 13th biennial conference: Public versus private planning: Themes, trends and tensions - Chicago, Illinois, United States
Duration: 10 Jul 200813 Jul 2008
Conference number: 13th
https://planninghistory.org/conferences/chicago-2003/

Conference

ConferenceInternational Planning History Society (IPHS) 13th biennial conference
CountryUnited States
CityChicago, Illinois
Period10/07/0813/07/08
Internet address

Fingerprint

new town
train
gold
coast
railway
car ownership
public access
Commonwealth of Nations
retirement
public transport
twenty first century
motorway
railway station
planning
infrastructure
public

Cite this

O'Hare, D. (2008). Missing the Gold Coast train: The interaction between private development and three levels of government planning in attempting to co locate a new railway station and a major new town centre. In C. Silver (Ed.), Proceedings of the International Planning History Society (IPHS) Conference: Public versus private planning: themes, trends and tensions (pp. 367-77). Florida/Chicago: University of Florida.
O'Hare, Daniel. / Missing the Gold Coast train : The interaction between private development and three levels of government planning in attempting to co locate a new railway station and a major new town centre. Proceedings of the International Planning History Society (IPHS) Conference: Public versus private planning: themes, trends and tensions. editor / C Silver. Florida/Chicago : University of Florida, 2008. pp. 367-77
@inproceedings{57b490e12fc2417cb78ba69e8bd742f4,
title = "Missing the Gold Coast train: The interaction between private development and three levels of government planning in attempting to co locate a new railway station and a major new town centre",
abstract = "Queensland’s Gold Coast was established as a collection of coastal tourist resorts by the late 19th century. Private development was stimulated in the conventional way, by State government provision of public transport. The main resort areas flourished due to easy public access via two railway lines from the State capital Brisbane. During the 20th century a much larger network of Gold Coast holiday resorts and retirement suburbs was created due to the greater mobility allowed by increasing car ownership. By the 1960s, the original Gold Coast railway lines were removed, with their corridors eventually being redeveloped for a mix of private development and publicly funded motorways. By the 1990s, the Gold Coast was well advanced in its transformation into a city region, as a major part of the rapidly urbanizing South East Queensland. In 1997, a new Gold Coast Railway was developed by the Queensland State Government, with funding assistance by the Commonwealth Government via its Building Better Cities program. This public investment in transport infrastructure coincided with the private development of a ‘master planned community’ at Robina, including a major town centre intended to become the Gold Coast’s second ‘CBD’. This paper investigates the reasons for the Robina Railway Station being so isolated (one kilometer) from the Robina Town Centre, despite the two being planned, designed and developed simultaneously. The separation of the two – and the deviation from accepted planning principles – has received significant informal criticism, but there is currently no cohesive public explanation or critique available. Methods for the investigation include documentary research and key informant interviews. This research will have value in increasing the understanding of deviations between planning principles and development outcomes, and our understanding of the interactions between private and public planning (at three levels of government) in the creation of urban centres and transport nodes at the turn of the 21st century.",
author = "Daniel O'Hare",
year = "2008",
language = "English",
pages = "367--77",
editor = "C Silver",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the International Planning History Society (IPHS) Conference",
publisher = "University of Florida",
address = "United States",

}

O'Hare, D 2008, Missing the Gold Coast train: The interaction between private development and three levels of government planning in attempting to co locate a new railway station and a major new town centre. in C Silver (ed.), Proceedings of the International Planning History Society (IPHS) Conference: Public versus private planning: themes, trends and tensions. University of Florida, Florida/Chicago, pp. 367-77, International Planning History Society (IPHS) 13th biennial conference, Chicago, Illinois, United States, 10/07/08.

Missing the Gold Coast train : The interaction between private development and three levels of government planning in attempting to co locate a new railway station and a major new town centre. / O'Hare, Daniel.

Proceedings of the International Planning History Society (IPHS) Conference: Public versus private planning: themes, trends and tensions. ed. / C Silver. Florida/Chicago : University of Florida, 2008. p. 367-77.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionResearchpeer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - Missing the Gold Coast train

T2 - The interaction between private development and three levels of government planning in attempting to co locate a new railway station and a major new town centre

AU - O'Hare, Daniel

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - Queensland’s Gold Coast was established as a collection of coastal tourist resorts by the late 19th century. Private development was stimulated in the conventional way, by State government provision of public transport. The main resort areas flourished due to easy public access via two railway lines from the State capital Brisbane. During the 20th century a much larger network of Gold Coast holiday resorts and retirement suburbs was created due to the greater mobility allowed by increasing car ownership. By the 1960s, the original Gold Coast railway lines were removed, with their corridors eventually being redeveloped for a mix of private development and publicly funded motorways. By the 1990s, the Gold Coast was well advanced in its transformation into a city region, as a major part of the rapidly urbanizing South East Queensland. In 1997, a new Gold Coast Railway was developed by the Queensland State Government, with funding assistance by the Commonwealth Government via its Building Better Cities program. This public investment in transport infrastructure coincided with the private development of a ‘master planned community’ at Robina, including a major town centre intended to become the Gold Coast’s second ‘CBD’. This paper investigates the reasons for the Robina Railway Station being so isolated (one kilometer) from the Robina Town Centre, despite the two being planned, designed and developed simultaneously. The separation of the two – and the deviation from accepted planning principles – has received significant informal criticism, but there is currently no cohesive public explanation or critique available. Methods for the investigation include documentary research and key informant interviews. This research will have value in increasing the understanding of deviations between planning principles and development outcomes, and our understanding of the interactions between private and public planning (at three levels of government) in the creation of urban centres and transport nodes at the turn of the 21st century.

AB - Queensland’s Gold Coast was established as a collection of coastal tourist resorts by the late 19th century. Private development was stimulated in the conventional way, by State government provision of public transport. The main resort areas flourished due to easy public access via two railway lines from the State capital Brisbane. During the 20th century a much larger network of Gold Coast holiday resorts and retirement suburbs was created due to the greater mobility allowed by increasing car ownership. By the 1960s, the original Gold Coast railway lines were removed, with their corridors eventually being redeveloped for a mix of private development and publicly funded motorways. By the 1990s, the Gold Coast was well advanced in its transformation into a city region, as a major part of the rapidly urbanizing South East Queensland. In 1997, a new Gold Coast Railway was developed by the Queensland State Government, with funding assistance by the Commonwealth Government via its Building Better Cities program. This public investment in transport infrastructure coincided with the private development of a ‘master planned community’ at Robina, including a major town centre intended to become the Gold Coast’s second ‘CBD’. This paper investigates the reasons for the Robina Railway Station being so isolated (one kilometer) from the Robina Town Centre, despite the two being planned, designed and developed simultaneously. The separation of the two – and the deviation from accepted planning principles – has received significant informal criticism, but there is currently no cohesive public explanation or critique available. Methods for the investigation include documentary research and key informant interviews. This research will have value in increasing the understanding of deviations between planning principles and development outcomes, and our understanding of the interactions between private and public planning (at three levels of government) in the creation of urban centres and transport nodes at the turn of the 21st century.

M3 - Conference contribution

SP - 367

EP - 377

BT - Proceedings of the International Planning History Society (IPHS) Conference

A2 - Silver, C

PB - University of Florida

CY - Florida/Chicago

ER -

O'Hare D. Missing the Gold Coast train: The interaction between private development and three levels of government planning in attempting to co locate a new railway station and a major new town centre. In Silver C, editor, Proceedings of the International Planning History Society (IPHS) Conference: Public versus private planning: themes, trends and tensions. Florida/Chicago: University of Florida. 2008. p. 367-77