Mini-CEX as a workplace-based assessment tool for interns in an emergency department: Does cost outweigh value?

Victoria Brazil, Leanne Ratcliffe, Jianzhen Zhang, Lorna Davin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

12 Citations (Scopus)
17 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: The mini-clinical evaluation exercise (mini-CEX) has been proposed as a method to address the deficiencies of in-training assessment for junior doctors. Aim: Our study aimed to determine the feasibility and value of adding mini-CEX assessments to the existing assessment processes for an intern cohort in the emergency department (ED). Methods: Interns undertook four mini-CEX assessments with senior ED medical officers, in addition to their standard in-training assessment processes. Assessment results and time taken to perform the mini-CEX assessments were recorded. Interns and assessors completed a survey regarding their perceptions of the mini-CEX assessment process. Results: The total time taken for mini-CEX assessments during the study period was 36.51 h. If extrapolated over a year this would represent an additional direct cost to the ED of more than $A 80,000 per year. No additional interns were identified as underperforming through the addition of the mini-CEX. The mini-CEX assessment process was perceived as generally positive. Both interns and assessors felt that it provided a valid assessment of intern performance, and enabled timely and specific feedback. Significant practical difficulties in arranging and conducting mini-CEX assessments in the workplace were identified. Conclusion: There was a significant cost to the ED as a result of adding mini-CEX encounters to interns' performance assessment. No change in summative outcome occurred for this study cohort.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1017-1023
Number of pages7
JournalMedical Teacher
Volume34
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Fingerprint

Workplace
Hospital Emergency Service
workplace
Costs and Cost Analysis
costs
Process Assessment (Health Care)
Values
evaluation
performance assessment
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

Cite this

Brazil, Victoria ; Ratcliffe, Leanne ; Zhang, Jianzhen ; Davin, Lorna. / Mini-CEX as a workplace-based assessment tool for interns in an emergency department : Does cost outweigh value?. In: Medical Teacher. 2012 ; Vol. 34, No. 12. pp. 1017-1023.
@article{f6eb572928374ad18429031727747f23,
title = "Mini-CEX as a workplace-based assessment tool for interns in an emergency department: Does cost outweigh value?",
abstract = "Background: The mini-clinical evaluation exercise (mini-CEX) has been proposed as a method to address the deficiencies of in-training assessment for junior doctors. Aim: Our study aimed to determine the feasibility and value of adding mini-CEX assessments to the existing assessment processes for an intern cohort in the emergency department (ED). Methods: Interns undertook four mini-CEX assessments with senior ED medical officers, in addition to their standard in-training assessment processes. Assessment results and time taken to perform the mini-CEX assessments were recorded. Interns and assessors completed a survey regarding their perceptions of the mini-CEX assessment process. Results: The total time taken for mini-CEX assessments during the study period was 36.51 h. If extrapolated over a year this would represent an additional direct cost to the ED of more than $A 80,000 per year. No additional interns were identified as underperforming through the addition of the mini-CEX. The mini-CEX assessment process was perceived as generally positive. Both interns and assessors felt that it provided a valid assessment of intern performance, and enabled timely and specific feedback. Significant practical difficulties in arranging and conducting mini-CEX assessments in the workplace were identified. Conclusion: There was a significant cost to the ED as a result of adding mini-CEX encounters to interns' performance assessment. No change in summative outcome occurred for this study cohort.",
author = "Victoria Brazil and Leanne Ratcliffe and Jianzhen Zhang and Lorna Davin",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.3109/0142159X.2012.719653",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "1017--1023",
journal = "Medical Teacher",
issn = "0142-159X",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "12",

}

Mini-CEX as a workplace-based assessment tool for interns in an emergency department : Does cost outweigh value? / Brazil, Victoria; Ratcliffe, Leanne; Zhang, Jianzhen; Davin, Lorna.

In: Medical Teacher, Vol. 34, No. 12, 2012, p. 1017-1023.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mini-CEX as a workplace-based assessment tool for interns in an emergency department

T2 - Does cost outweigh value?

AU - Brazil, Victoria

AU - Ratcliffe, Leanne

AU - Zhang, Jianzhen

AU - Davin, Lorna

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Background: The mini-clinical evaluation exercise (mini-CEX) has been proposed as a method to address the deficiencies of in-training assessment for junior doctors. Aim: Our study aimed to determine the feasibility and value of adding mini-CEX assessments to the existing assessment processes for an intern cohort in the emergency department (ED). Methods: Interns undertook four mini-CEX assessments with senior ED medical officers, in addition to their standard in-training assessment processes. Assessment results and time taken to perform the mini-CEX assessments were recorded. Interns and assessors completed a survey regarding their perceptions of the mini-CEX assessment process. Results: The total time taken for mini-CEX assessments during the study period was 36.51 h. If extrapolated over a year this would represent an additional direct cost to the ED of more than $A 80,000 per year. No additional interns were identified as underperforming through the addition of the mini-CEX. The mini-CEX assessment process was perceived as generally positive. Both interns and assessors felt that it provided a valid assessment of intern performance, and enabled timely and specific feedback. Significant practical difficulties in arranging and conducting mini-CEX assessments in the workplace were identified. Conclusion: There was a significant cost to the ED as a result of adding mini-CEX encounters to interns' performance assessment. No change in summative outcome occurred for this study cohort.

AB - Background: The mini-clinical evaluation exercise (mini-CEX) has been proposed as a method to address the deficiencies of in-training assessment for junior doctors. Aim: Our study aimed to determine the feasibility and value of adding mini-CEX assessments to the existing assessment processes for an intern cohort in the emergency department (ED). Methods: Interns undertook four mini-CEX assessments with senior ED medical officers, in addition to their standard in-training assessment processes. Assessment results and time taken to perform the mini-CEX assessments were recorded. Interns and assessors completed a survey regarding their perceptions of the mini-CEX assessment process. Results: The total time taken for mini-CEX assessments during the study period was 36.51 h. If extrapolated over a year this would represent an additional direct cost to the ED of more than $A 80,000 per year. No additional interns were identified as underperforming through the addition of the mini-CEX. The mini-CEX assessment process was perceived as generally positive. Both interns and assessors felt that it provided a valid assessment of intern performance, and enabled timely and specific feedback. Significant practical difficulties in arranging and conducting mini-CEX assessments in the workplace were identified. Conclusion: There was a significant cost to the ED as a result of adding mini-CEX encounters to interns' performance assessment. No change in summative outcome occurred for this study cohort.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84870879249&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3109/0142159X.2012.719653

DO - 10.3109/0142159X.2012.719653

M3 - Article

VL - 34

SP - 1017

EP - 1023

JO - Medical Teacher

JF - Medical Teacher

SN - 0142-159X

IS - 12

ER -