Military courts in Pakistan: A critical analysis

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Pakistan is a frontline state against the global war on terrorism. In December 2014, an attack on a school in Peshwar, Pakistan killed more than 130 students. In response, the Government of Pakistan established military courts to conduct trials of those suspected of terrorism-related offences. This measure may be viewed as a necessary evil - a temporary measure to speed up the rial process. On the other hand, it breaches human rights guarantees such as the right to a fair trial and undermines the separation of judicial power. Therefore, it cannot be a desirable long-term solution to terrorism. From a global perspective, the issue confronting Pakistan is one shared by other States confronting the scourge of terrorism: should national security and public safety trump other human rights? Even so, should the Pakistani government continue on its path of prioritizing national security at the expense of civil liberties and various constitutional rights? And, if so, are there controls and a system of checks and balances over the powers of the government security organisations? Ultimately, I argue that the establishment of military courts is justified, albeit an 'antibiotic' solution to larger systemic deficiencies in the justice system.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationGlobal governance and regulation
Subtitle of host publicationOrder and disorder in the 21st century
EditorsD Ireland-Piper, L Wolff
Place of PublicationOxon
PublisherRoutledge
Chapter16
Pages261-277
Number of pages17
ISBN (Print)9781472489012
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Fingerprint

Pakistan
terrorism
Military
national security
human rights
judicial power
guarantee
justice
offense
school
student

Cite this

Ghori, U. H. (2018). Military courts in Pakistan: A critical analysis. In D. Ireland-Piper, & L. Wolff (Eds.), Global governance and regulation: Order and disorder in the 21st century (pp. 261-277). Oxon: Routledge.
Ghori, Umair Hafeez . / Military courts in Pakistan : A critical analysis. Global governance and regulation: Order and disorder in the 21st century. editor / D Ireland-Piper ; L Wolff. Oxon : Routledge, 2018. pp. 261-277
@inbook{b6c7b1b771b646f09c90364dfaa8d113,
title = "Military courts in Pakistan: A critical analysis",
abstract = "Pakistan is a frontline state against the global war on terrorism. In December 2014, an attack on a school in Peshwar, Pakistan killed more than 130 students. In response, the Government of Pakistan established military courts to conduct trials of those suspected of terrorism-related offences. This measure may be viewed as a necessary evil - a temporary measure to speed up the rial process. On the other hand, it breaches human rights guarantees such as the right to a fair trial and undermines the separation of judicial power. Therefore, it cannot be a desirable long-term solution to terrorism. From a global perspective, the issue confronting Pakistan is one shared by other States confronting the scourge of terrorism: should national security and public safety trump other human rights? Even so, should the Pakistani government continue on its path of prioritizing national security at the expense of civil liberties and various constitutional rights? And, if so, are there controls and a system of checks and balances over the powers of the government security organisations? Ultimately, I argue that the establishment of military courts is justified, albeit an 'antibiotic' solution to larger systemic deficiencies in the justice system.",
author = "Ghori, {Umair Hafeez}",
year = "2018",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781472489012",
pages = "261--277",
editor = "D Ireland-Piper and L Wolff",
booktitle = "Global governance and regulation",
publisher = "Routledge",
address = "United States",

}

Ghori, UH 2018, Military courts in Pakistan: A critical analysis. in D Ireland-Piper & L Wolff (eds), Global governance and regulation: Order and disorder in the 21st century. Routledge, Oxon, pp. 261-277.

Military courts in Pakistan : A critical analysis. / Ghori, Umair Hafeez .

Global governance and regulation: Order and disorder in the 21st century. ed. / D Ireland-Piper; L Wolff. Oxon : Routledge, 2018. p. 261-277.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterResearchpeer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - Military courts in Pakistan

T2 - A critical analysis

AU - Ghori, Umair Hafeez

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Pakistan is a frontline state against the global war on terrorism. In December 2014, an attack on a school in Peshwar, Pakistan killed more than 130 students. In response, the Government of Pakistan established military courts to conduct trials of those suspected of terrorism-related offences. This measure may be viewed as a necessary evil - a temporary measure to speed up the rial process. On the other hand, it breaches human rights guarantees such as the right to a fair trial and undermines the separation of judicial power. Therefore, it cannot be a desirable long-term solution to terrorism. From a global perspective, the issue confronting Pakistan is one shared by other States confronting the scourge of terrorism: should national security and public safety trump other human rights? Even so, should the Pakistani government continue on its path of prioritizing national security at the expense of civil liberties and various constitutional rights? And, if so, are there controls and a system of checks and balances over the powers of the government security organisations? Ultimately, I argue that the establishment of military courts is justified, albeit an 'antibiotic' solution to larger systemic deficiencies in the justice system.

AB - Pakistan is a frontline state against the global war on terrorism. In December 2014, an attack on a school in Peshwar, Pakistan killed more than 130 students. In response, the Government of Pakistan established military courts to conduct trials of those suspected of terrorism-related offences. This measure may be viewed as a necessary evil - a temporary measure to speed up the rial process. On the other hand, it breaches human rights guarantees such as the right to a fair trial and undermines the separation of judicial power. Therefore, it cannot be a desirable long-term solution to terrorism. From a global perspective, the issue confronting Pakistan is one shared by other States confronting the scourge of terrorism: should national security and public safety trump other human rights? Even so, should the Pakistani government continue on its path of prioritizing national security at the expense of civil liberties and various constitutional rights? And, if so, are there controls and a system of checks and balances over the powers of the government security organisations? Ultimately, I argue that the establishment of military courts is justified, albeit an 'antibiotic' solution to larger systemic deficiencies in the justice system.

UR - https://www.routledge.com/Global-Governance-and-Regulation-Order-and-Disorder-in-the-21st-Century/Ireland-Piper-Wolff/p/book/9781472489012

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781472489012

SP - 261

EP - 277

BT - Global governance and regulation

A2 - Ireland-Piper, D

A2 - Wolff, L

PB - Routledge

CY - Oxon

ER -

Ghori UH. Military courts in Pakistan: A critical analysis. In Ireland-Piper D, Wolff L, editors, Global governance and regulation: Order and disorder in the 21st century. Oxon: Routledge. 2018. p. 261-277