Middle Power Hybridisation and China

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This chapter explores how middle power hybridisation theory may be utilised to
direct the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) relations with its neighbouring
middle powers and how these middle powers may best take advantage of China
as a great power to achieve their own goals. The chapter’s focus is thus guided by
China’s concept of neighbourhood diplomacy. China’s relations with the US are
also considered within this context. Cooperation between the two great powers
is found to be necessary to restrict the self-motivated capacity of middle powers to disrupt their relationship. The opaque governance structures of the PRC,
the predominantly atheoretical nature of indigenous Chinese international relations scholarship and a subsequent dominance of the Communist Party of China
(CPC) as the source of great power statecraft are identified as critical components
to be accounted for in middle power statecraft. The practical question that this
chapter asks is: does the behavioural policy prescription to seek multilateral solutions, embrace compromise in international disputes and be a good international
citizen constitute a satisfactory foreign policy strategy for middle powers when
dealing with the PRC? This chapter finds that other policy options should also be
considered and developed through hybridisation theory, and it explains why the
behavioural prescription will be demoted due to structural power changes in the
global political economy (GPE) (Strange, 1994, p. 25).
LanguageEnglish
Title of host publicationRethinking Middle Powers in the Asia Century
Subtitle of host publicationNew theories, new cases
EditorsTanguy Struye de Swielande, Dorothee Vandamme, David Walton, Thomas Wilkins
Place of PublicationMilton
PublisherRoutledge
Chapter16
Pages210-223
Number of pages24
ISBN (Electronic)9780429873850
ISBN (Print)9781138614871
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Publication series

NameIR Theory and Practice in Asia
PublisherRoutledge

Fingerprint

China
great power
medication
change in power
communist party
diplomacy
international relations
compromise
foreign policy
political economy
governance

Cite this

Ping, J. (2019). Middle Power Hybridisation and China. In T. Struye de Swielande, D. Vandamme, D. Walton, & T. Wilkins (Eds.), Rethinking Middle Powers in the Asia Century: New theories, new cases (pp. 210-223). (IR Theory and Practice in Asia). Milton: Routledge.
Ping, Jonathan. / Middle Power Hybridisation and China. Rethinking Middle Powers in the Asia Century: New theories, new cases. editor / Tanguy Struye de Swielande ; Dorothee Vandamme ; David Walton ; Thomas Wilkins. Milton : Routledge, 2019. pp. 210-223 (IR Theory and Practice in Asia).
@inbook{2667cecbc18e4461b0c290eea670d5e7,
title = "Middle Power Hybridisation and China",
abstract = "This chapter explores how middle power hybridisation theory may be utilised todirect the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) relations with its neighbouringmiddle powers and how these middle powers may best take advantage of Chinaas a great power to achieve their own goals. The chapter’s focus is thus guided byChina’s concept of neighbourhood diplomacy. China’s relations with the US arealso considered within this context. Cooperation between the two great powersis found to be necessary to restrict the self-motivated capacity of middle powers to disrupt their relationship. The opaque governance structures of the PRC,the predominantly atheoretical nature of indigenous Chinese international relations scholarship and a subsequent dominance of the Communist Party of China(CPC) as the source of great power statecraft are identified as critical componentsto be accounted for in middle power statecraft. The practical question that thischapter asks is: does the behavioural policy prescription to seek multilateral solutions, embrace compromise in international disputes and be a good internationalcitizen constitute a satisfactory foreign policy strategy for middle powers whendealing with the PRC? This chapter finds that other policy options should also beconsidered and developed through hybridisation theory, and it explains why thebehavioural prescription will be demoted due to structural power changes in theglobal political economy (GPE) (Strange, 1994, p. 25).",
author = "Jonathan Ping",
year = "2019",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781138614871",
series = "IR Theory and Practice in Asia",
publisher = "Routledge",
pages = "210--223",
editor = "{Struye de Swielande}, Tanguy and Dorothee Vandamme and David Walton and Wilkins, {Thomas }",
booktitle = "Rethinking Middle Powers in the Asia Century",
address = "United States",

}

Ping, J 2019, Middle Power Hybridisation and China. in T Struye de Swielande, D Vandamme, D Walton & T Wilkins (eds), Rethinking Middle Powers in the Asia Century: New theories, new cases. IR Theory and Practice in Asia, Routledge, Milton, pp. 210-223.

Middle Power Hybridisation and China. / Ping, Jonathan.

Rethinking Middle Powers in the Asia Century: New theories, new cases. ed. / Tanguy Struye de Swielande; Dorothee Vandamme; David Walton; Thomas Wilkins. Milton : Routledge, 2019. p. 210-223 (IR Theory and Practice in Asia).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterResearchpeer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - Middle Power Hybridisation and China

AU - Ping, Jonathan

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - This chapter explores how middle power hybridisation theory may be utilised todirect the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) relations with its neighbouringmiddle powers and how these middle powers may best take advantage of Chinaas a great power to achieve their own goals. The chapter’s focus is thus guided byChina’s concept of neighbourhood diplomacy. China’s relations with the US arealso considered within this context. Cooperation between the two great powersis found to be necessary to restrict the self-motivated capacity of middle powers to disrupt their relationship. The opaque governance structures of the PRC,the predominantly atheoretical nature of indigenous Chinese international relations scholarship and a subsequent dominance of the Communist Party of China(CPC) as the source of great power statecraft are identified as critical componentsto be accounted for in middle power statecraft. The practical question that thischapter asks is: does the behavioural policy prescription to seek multilateral solutions, embrace compromise in international disputes and be a good internationalcitizen constitute a satisfactory foreign policy strategy for middle powers whendealing with the PRC? This chapter finds that other policy options should also beconsidered and developed through hybridisation theory, and it explains why thebehavioural prescription will be demoted due to structural power changes in theglobal political economy (GPE) (Strange, 1994, p. 25).

AB - This chapter explores how middle power hybridisation theory may be utilised todirect the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) relations with its neighbouringmiddle powers and how these middle powers may best take advantage of Chinaas a great power to achieve their own goals. The chapter’s focus is thus guided byChina’s concept of neighbourhood diplomacy. China’s relations with the US arealso considered within this context. Cooperation between the two great powersis found to be necessary to restrict the self-motivated capacity of middle powers to disrupt their relationship. The opaque governance structures of the PRC,the predominantly atheoretical nature of indigenous Chinese international relations scholarship and a subsequent dominance of the Communist Party of China(CPC) as the source of great power statecraft are identified as critical componentsto be accounted for in middle power statecraft. The practical question that thischapter asks is: does the behavioural policy prescription to seek multilateral solutions, embrace compromise in international disputes and be a good internationalcitizen constitute a satisfactory foreign policy strategy for middle powers whendealing with the PRC? This chapter finds that other policy options should also beconsidered and developed through hybridisation theory, and it explains why thebehavioural prescription will be demoted due to structural power changes in theglobal political economy (GPE) (Strange, 1994, p. 25).

UR - https://www.routledge.com/Rethinking-Middle-Powers-in-the-Asian-Century-New-Theories-New-Cases/Struye-de-Swielande-Vandamme-Walton-Wilkins/p/book/9781138614871

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781138614871

T3 - IR Theory and Practice in Asia

SP - 210

EP - 223

BT - Rethinking Middle Powers in the Asia Century

A2 - Struye de Swielande, Tanguy

A2 - Vandamme, Dorothee

A2 - Walton, David

A2 - Wilkins, Thomas

PB - Routledge

CY - Milton

ER -

Ping J. Middle Power Hybridisation and China. In Struye de Swielande T, Vandamme D, Walton D, Wilkins T, editors, Rethinking Middle Powers in the Asia Century: New theories, new cases. Milton: Routledge. 2019. p. 210-223. (IR Theory and Practice in Asia).