Methodological considerations for meal-induced thermogenesis: Measurement duration and reproducibility

Leonie C. Ruddick-Collins, Neil A. King, Nuala M. Byrne, Rachel E. Wood

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Meal-induced thermogenesis (MIT) research findings have been highly inconsistent, in part, due to the variety of durations and protocols used to measure MIT. In the present study, we aimed to determine the following: (1) the proportion of a 6 h MIT response completed at 3, 4 and 5 h; (2) the associations between the shorter durations and the 6 h measures; (3) whether shorter durations improved the reproducibility of the measurement. MIT was measured in response to a 2410 kJ mixed composition meal in ten individuals (five males and five females) on two occasions. Energy expenditure was measured continuously for 6 h post-meal using indirect calorimetry, and MIT was calculated as the increase in energy expenditure above the pre-meal RMR. On average, 76, 89 and 96 % of the 6 h MIT response was completed within 3, 4 and 5 h, respectively, and MIT at each of these time points was strongly correlated with the 6 h MIT response (range for correlations, r 0·990-0·998; P< 0·01). The between-day CV for the 6 h measurement was 33 %, but it was significantly lower after 3 h of measurement (CV 26 %; P= 0·02). Despite variability in the total MIT between days, the proportion of MIT that was completed at 3, 4 and 5 h was reproducible (mean CV: 5 %). While 6 h are typically required to measure the complete MIT response, the 3 h measures provide sufficient information about the magnitude of the MIT response and may be applicable for testing individuals on repeated occasions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1978-1986
Number of pages9
JournalBritish Journal of Nutrition
Volume110
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 14 Dec 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Thermogenesis
Meals
Energy Metabolism
Indirect Calorimetry

Cite this

Ruddick-Collins, Leonie C. ; King, Neil A. ; Byrne, Nuala M. ; Wood, Rachel E. / Methodological considerations for meal-induced thermogenesis : Measurement duration and reproducibility. In: British Journal of Nutrition. 2013 ; Vol. 110, No. 11. pp. 1978-1986.
@article{d588687689dd4129ba9528edc2494943,
title = "Methodological considerations for meal-induced thermogenesis: Measurement duration and reproducibility",
abstract = "Meal-induced thermogenesis (MIT) research findings have been highly inconsistent, in part, due to the variety of durations and protocols used to measure MIT. In the present study, we aimed to determine the following: (1) the proportion of a 6 h MIT response completed at 3, 4 and 5 h; (2) the associations between the shorter durations and the 6 h measures; (3) whether shorter durations improved the reproducibility of the measurement. MIT was measured in response to a 2410 kJ mixed composition meal in ten individuals (five males and five females) on two occasions. Energy expenditure was measured continuously for 6 h post-meal using indirect calorimetry, and MIT was calculated as the increase in energy expenditure above the pre-meal RMR. On average, 76, 89 and 96 {\%} of the 6 h MIT response was completed within 3, 4 and 5 h, respectively, and MIT at each of these time points was strongly correlated with the 6 h MIT response (range for correlations, r 0·990-0·998; P< 0·01). The between-day CV for the 6 h measurement was 33 {\%}, but it was significantly lower after 3 h of measurement (CV 26 {\%}; P= 0·02). Despite variability in the total MIT between days, the proportion of MIT that was completed at 3, 4 and 5 h was reproducible (mean CV: 5 {\%}). While 6 h are typically required to measure the complete MIT response, the 3 h measures provide sufficient information about the magnitude of the MIT response and may be applicable for testing individuals on repeated occasions.",
author = "Ruddick-Collins, {Leonie C.} and King, {Neil A.} and Byrne, {Nuala M.} and Wood, {Rachel E.}",
year = "2013",
month = "12",
day = "14",
doi = "10.1017/S0007114513001451",
language = "English",
volume = "110",
pages = "1978--1986",
journal = "British Journal of Nutrition",
issn = "0007-1145",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "11",

}

Methodological considerations for meal-induced thermogenesis : Measurement duration and reproducibility. / Ruddick-Collins, Leonie C.; King, Neil A.; Byrne, Nuala M.; Wood, Rachel E.

In: British Journal of Nutrition, Vol. 110, No. 11, 14.12.2013, p. 1978-1986.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Methodological considerations for meal-induced thermogenesis

T2 - Measurement duration and reproducibility

AU - Ruddick-Collins, Leonie C.

AU - King, Neil A.

AU - Byrne, Nuala M.

AU - Wood, Rachel E.

PY - 2013/12/14

Y1 - 2013/12/14

N2 - Meal-induced thermogenesis (MIT) research findings have been highly inconsistent, in part, due to the variety of durations and protocols used to measure MIT. In the present study, we aimed to determine the following: (1) the proportion of a 6 h MIT response completed at 3, 4 and 5 h; (2) the associations between the shorter durations and the 6 h measures; (3) whether shorter durations improved the reproducibility of the measurement. MIT was measured in response to a 2410 kJ mixed composition meal in ten individuals (five males and five females) on two occasions. Energy expenditure was measured continuously for 6 h post-meal using indirect calorimetry, and MIT was calculated as the increase in energy expenditure above the pre-meal RMR. On average, 76, 89 and 96 % of the 6 h MIT response was completed within 3, 4 and 5 h, respectively, and MIT at each of these time points was strongly correlated with the 6 h MIT response (range for correlations, r 0·990-0·998; P< 0·01). The between-day CV for the 6 h measurement was 33 %, but it was significantly lower after 3 h of measurement (CV 26 %; P= 0·02). Despite variability in the total MIT between days, the proportion of MIT that was completed at 3, 4 and 5 h was reproducible (mean CV: 5 %). While 6 h are typically required to measure the complete MIT response, the 3 h measures provide sufficient information about the magnitude of the MIT response and may be applicable for testing individuals on repeated occasions.

AB - Meal-induced thermogenesis (MIT) research findings have been highly inconsistent, in part, due to the variety of durations and protocols used to measure MIT. In the present study, we aimed to determine the following: (1) the proportion of a 6 h MIT response completed at 3, 4 and 5 h; (2) the associations between the shorter durations and the 6 h measures; (3) whether shorter durations improved the reproducibility of the measurement. MIT was measured in response to a 2410 kJ mixed composition meal in ten individuals (five males and five females) on two occasions. Energy expenditure was measured continuously for 6 h post-meal using indirect calorimetry, and MIT was calculated as the increase in energy expenditure above the pre-meal RMR. On average, 76, 89 and 96 % of the 6 h MIT response was completed within 3, 4 and 5 h, respectively, and MIT at each of these time points was strongly correlated with the 6 h MIT response (range for correlations, r 0·990-0·998; P< 0·01). The between-day CV for the 6 h measurement was 33 %, but it was significantly lower after 3 h of measurement (CV 26 %; P= 0·02). Despite variability in the total MIT between days, the proportion of MIT that was completed at 3, 4 and 5 h was reproducible (mean CV: 5 %). While 6 h are typically required to measure the complete MIT response, the 3 h measures provide sufficient information about the magnitude of the MIT response and may be applicable for testing individuals on repeated occasions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84888347423&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0007114513001451

DO - 10.1017/S0007114513001451

M3 - Article

VL - 110

SP - 1978

EP - 1986

JO - British Journal of Nutrition

JF - British Journal of Nutrition

SN - 0007-1145

IS - 11

ER -