Method and Criteria for Climate Change Policy Evaluation in Australia

  • Evgeny Guglyuvatyy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Many countries have already implemented either emission trading schemes (ETS) or carbon taxes or both. National governments tend to prefer ETSs over carbon taxes due to the political acceptability of ETSs. The Australian Government proposed emissions trading as a centerpiece of national climate change policy. However, there is still a debate concerning the choice of instruments for climate change policy. This paper suggests that for a comprehensive policy-making process prospective policy instruments require to be evaluated on a multi-criteria basis. To evaluate carbon tax and emissions trading the multi-criteria analysis (MCA) is proposed. To obtain the criteria specific to Australian conditions and assess relative importance of those criteria, the Delphi method is adopted. The Delphi study employs a group of Australian experts to revise and weigh the evaluation criteria. The result of this examination determines what criteria are considered to be necessary for evaluation of carbon tax and emissions trading in Australian context.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)355-362
Number of pages8
JournalEnvironmental Policy and Law
Volume40
Issue number6
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2010
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 13 - Climate Action
    SDG 13 Climate Action

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Method and Criteria for Climate Change Policy Evaluation in Australia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this