Metacognition in criminal profiling

Barry Woodhouse, Wayne Petherick

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This chapter is on metacognition and presents the results of Barry Woodhouse's Master of Psychology (Forensic) thesis that sought to determine whether those given a basic level of profiling education were better at discriminating between a good profile and a bad profile. Results suggest that, even with a basic level of education, individuals rated a poor (and fictional) account of profiling as being of poorer quality than the other profile presented in the experiment. The theory behind metacognition, knowing when you don't know, is provided and discussed within the context of the experiment.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProfiling and Serial Crime: Theoretical and Practical Issues
EditorsW Petherick
Place of PublicationUntied Kingdom
PublisherElsevier
Pages185-206
Number of pages22
Edition3rd
ISBN (Print)9781455731749
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2013

Fingerprint

level of education
forensic psychology
experiment

Cite this

Woodhouse, B., & Petherick, W. (2013). Metacognition in criminal profiling. In W. Petherick (Ed.), Profiling and Serial Crime: Theoretical and Practical Issues (3rd ed., pp. 185-206). Untied Kingdom: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-4557-3174-9.00010-0
Woodhouse, Barry ; Petherick, Wayne. / Metacognition in criminal profiling. Profiling and Serial Crime: Theoretical and Practical Issues. editor / W Petherick. 3rd. ed. Untied Kingdom : Elsevier, 2013. pp. 185-206
@inbook{a36753c6c7954bc0a748e2d7a86ff1ff,
title = "Metacognition in criminal profiling",
abstract = "This chapter is on metacognition and presents the results of Barry Woodhouse's Master of Psychology (Forensic) thesis that sought to determine whether those given a basic level of profiling education were better at discriminating between a good profile and a bad profile. Results suggest that, even with a basic level of education, individuals rated a poor (and fictional) account of profiling as being of poorer quality than the other profile presented in the experiment. The theory behind metacognition, knowing when you don't know, is provided and discussed within the context of the experiment.",
author = "Barry Woodhouse and Wayne Petherick",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/B978-1-4557-3174-9.00010-0",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781455731749",
pages = "185--206",
editor = "W Petherick",
booktitle = "Profiling and Serial Crime: Theoretical and Practical Issues",
publisher = "Elsevier",
address = "Netherlands",
edition = "3rd",

}

Woodhouse, B & Petherick, W 2013, Metacognition in criminal profiling. in W Petherick (ed.), Profiling and Serial Crime: Theoretical and Practical Issues. 3rd edn, Elsevier, Untied Kingdom, pp. 185-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-4557-3174-9.00010-0

Metacognition in criminal profiling. / Woodhouse, Barry; Petherick, Wayne.

Profiling and Serial Crime: Theoretical and Practical Issues. ed. / W Petherick. 3rd. ed. Untied Kingdom : Elsevier, 2013. p. 185-206.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterResearchpeer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - Metacognition in criminal profiling

AU - Woodhouse, Barry

AU - Petherick, Wayne

PY - 2013/1

Y1 - 2013/1

N2 - This chapter is on metacognition and presents the results of Barry Woodhouse's Master of Psychology (Forensic) thesis that sought to determine whether those given a basic level of profiling education were better at discriminating between a good profile and a bad profile. Results suggest that, even with a basic level of education, individuals rated a poor (and fictional) account of profiling as being of poorer quality than the other profile presented in the experiment. The theory behind metacognition, knowing when you don't know, is provided and discussed within the context of the experiment.

AB - This chapter is on metacognition and presents the results of Barry Woodhouse's Master of Psychology (Forensic) thesis that sought to determine whether those given a basic level of profiling education were better at discriminating between a good profile and a bad profile. Results suggest that, even with a basic level of education, individuals rated a poor (and fictional) account of profiling as being of poorer quality than the other profile presented in the experiment. The theory behind metacognition, knowing when you don't know, is provided and discussed within the context of the experiment.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84902034609&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/B978-1-4557-3174-9.00010-0

DO - 10.1016/B978-1-4557-3174-9.00010-0

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781455731749

SP - 185

EP - 206

BT - Profiling and Serial Crime: Theoretical and Practical Issues

A2 - Petherick, W

PB - Elsevier

CY - Untied Kingdom

ER -

Woodhouse B, Petherick W. Metacognition in criminal profiling. In Petherick W, editor, Profiling and Serial Crime: Theoretical and Practical Issues. 3rd ed. Untied Kingdom: Elsevier. 2013. p. 185-206 https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-4557-3174-9.00010-0