Medical practitioners' knowledge and self-reported practices of substitute decision making and implementation of advance care plans

C. Cartwright, J. Montgomery, J. Rhee, N. Zwar, A. Banbury

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Advance care planning (ACP) provides patients with the ability to make their decisions known about how they would like to be treated if they lose capacity. Medical practitioners have a key role to play in providing information on ACP to their patients. This research explores their knowledge and attitudes to advance care planning and how this affects their practice. Aim: The objective of this study is to assess the NSW medical practitioners' knowledge and self-reported practice of ACP. Methods: A postal survey of a random sample of 650 general practitioners plus 350 medical specialists from specialties most often involved in end-of-life decisions was conducted. Respondents' work location post codes were subsequently used to assign respondents to one of the eight NSW Area Health Services. The main outcome measures were medical practitioners' knowledge of and practice pertaining to ACP. Results: Thirty-four per cent of specialists (n = 110) and 24% of general practitioners (n = 150) responded; the majority of respondents had heard of all ACP options. However, respondents' understanding of the uses and legal requirements of the relevant ACP options vary widely. Conclusions: Respect for patient wishes expressed in advance directives is reassuringly high. The findings suggest significant misunderstanding by medical practitioners of terminologies and systems around substitute decision-making for incompetent persons. Further education and standardisation of terminologies and systems across different jurisdictions would assist in addressing these issues. Low response rate, relating to only one legal jurisdiction, means results may not be generalisable.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)234-239
Number of pages6
JournalInternal Medicine Journal
Volume44
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Advance Care Planning
Decision Making
Terminology
General Practitioners
Catchment Area (Health)
Advance Directives
Aptitude
Workplace
Medicine
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Surveys and Questionnaires
Education

Cite this

@article{79a83cb6f73e4c489a7526f8b6d524fe,
title = "Medical practitioners' knowledge and self-reported practices of substitute decision making and implementation of advance care plans",
abstract = "Background: Advance care planning (ACP) provides patients with the ability to make their decisions known about how they would like to be treated if they lose capacity. Medical practitioners have a key role to play in providing information on ACP to their patients. This research explores their knowledge and attitudes to advance care planning and how this affects their practice. Aim: The objective of this study is to assess the NSW medical practitioners' knowledge and self-reported practice of ACP. Methods: A postal survey of a random sample of 650 general practitioners plus 350 medical specialists from specialties most often involved in end-of-life decisions was conducted. Respondents' work location post codes were subsequently used to assign respondents to one of the eight NSW Area Health Services. The main outcome measures were medical practitioners' knowledge of and practice pertaining to ACP. Results: Thirty-four per cent of specialists (n = 110) and 24{\%} of general practitioners (n = 150) responded; the majority of respondents had heard of all ACP options. However, respondents' understanding of the uses and legal requirements of the relevant ACP options vary widely. Conclusions: Respect for patient wishes expressed in advance directives is reassuringly high. The findings suggest significant misunderstanding by medical practitioners of terminologies and systems around substitute decision-making for incompetent persons. Further education and standardisation of terminologies and systems across different jurisdictions would assist in addressing these issues. Low response rate, relating to only one legal jurisdiction, means results may not be generalisable.",
author = "C. Cartwright and J. Montgomery and J. Rhee and N. Zwar and A. Banbury",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/imj.12354",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "234--239",
journal = "Australian and New Zealand Journal of Medicine",
issn = "1444-0903",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

Medical practitioners' knowledge and self-reported practices of substitute decision making and implementation of advance care plans. / Cartwright, C.; Montgomery, J.; Rhee, J.; Zwar, N.; Banbury, A.

In: Internal Medicine Journal, Vol. 44, No. 3, 01.01.2014, p. 234-239.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Medical practitioners' knowledge and self-reported practices of substitute decision making and implementation of advance care plans

AU - Cartwright, C.

AU - Montgomery, J.

AU - Rhee, J.

AU - Zwar, N.

AU - Banbury, A.

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Background: Advance care planning (ACP) provides patients with the ability to make their decisions known about how they would like to be treated if they lose capacity. Medical practitioners have a key role to play in providing information on ACP to their patients. This research explores their knowledge and attitudes to advance care planning and how this affects their practice. Aim: The objective of this study is to assess the NSW medical practitioners' knowledge and self-reported practice of ACP. Methods: A postal survey of a random sample of 650 general practitioners plus 350 medical specialists from specialties most often involved in end-of-life decisions was conducted. Respondents' work location post codes were subsequently used to assign respondents to one of the eight NSW Area Health Services. The main outcome measures were medical practitioners' knowledge of and practice pertaining to ACP. Results: Thirty-four per cent of specialists (n = 110) and 24% of general practitioners (n = 150) responded; the majority of respondents had heard of all ACP options. However, respondents' understanding of the uses and legal requirements of the relevant ACP options vary widely. Conclusions: Respect for patient wishes expressed in advance directives is reassuringly high. The findings suggest significant misunderstanding by medical practitioners of terminologies and systems around substitute decision-making for incompetent persons. Further education and standardisation of terminologies and systems across different jurisdictions would assist in addressing these issues. Low response rate, relating to only one legal jurisdiction, means results may not be generalisable.

AB - Background: Advance care planning (ACP) provides patients with the ability to make their decisions known about how they would like to be treated if they lose capacity. Medical practitioners have a key role to play in providing information on ACP to their patients. This research explores their knowledge and attitudes to advance care planning and how this affects their practice. Aim: The objective of this study is to assess the NSW medical practitioners' knowledge and self-reported practice of ACP. Methods: A postal survey of a random sample of 650 general practitioners plus 350 medical specialists from specialties most often involved in end-of-life decisions was conducted. Respondents' work location post codes were subsequently used to assign respondents to one of the eight NSW Area Health Services. The main outcome measures were medical practitioners' knowledge of and practice pertaining to ACP. Results: Thirty-four per cent of specialists (n = 110) and 24% of general practitioners (n = 150) responded; the majority of respondents had heard of all ACP options. However, respondents' understanding of the uses and legal requirements of the relevant ACP options vary widely. Conclusions: Respect for patient wishes expressed in advance directives is reassuringly high. The findings suggest significant misunderstanding by medical practitioners of terminologies and systems around substitute decision-making for incompetent persons. Further education and standardisation of terminologies and systems across different jurisdictions would assist in addressing these issues. Low response rate, relating to only one legal jurisdiction, means results may not be generalisable.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84896811005&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/imj.12354

DO - 10.1111/imj.12354

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 234

EP - 239

JO - Australian and New Zealand Journal of Medicine

JF - Australian and New Zealand Journal of Medicine

SN - 1444-0903

IS - 3

ER -