Mediators and Substantive Justice: A Sociocultural Perspective

Research output: Contribution to conferenceAbstractResearchpeer-review

74 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Disputing and dispute resolution are activities which are largely shaped by the cultural and
social context within which they take place. Sociocultural forces influence the dispute
resolution preferences of parties in conflict and the way in which particular dispute resolution
methods – such as mediation - are perceived and practiced. These forces also impact the role
that mediators are expected to play, if any, in attempting to influence the outcome of the
mediation such that ‘substantive justice’ or ‘fair outcomes’ are achieved.
101
The link between culture, society, dispute resolution preferences and the mediator’s role and
responsibility for outcome fairness is clearly evident when one compares the mediation
systems of China and the West. In China, it is common for mediators to deliver lectures on
moral virtue and to express opinions about the desired outcome of mediation, that is, an
outcome that accords with community standards of fairness, preserves relationships and
restores social harmony. Chinese mediators are openly assertive in their efforts. Mediation in
the West serves a different function and takes a somewhat different form than mediation in
China. Although some ‘Western’ mediators in some mediations express an opinion as to the
likely outcome if the matter does not settle, such interventions are often frowned about. The
prevailing attitude in the West is that mediators are only responsible for process fairness, and
not for outcome fairness. This paper falls into two main parts. In the first part, the link
between culture, society and preference for dispute resolution methods is explored. The
impact of culture and society on the purposes of mediation and the practice of mediation
including acceptable mediator interventions, is discussed in the second part of the paper. The
paper proceeds by way of a comparative analysis of the mediation of interpersonal disputes
between individuals, in mainland China and the West (more specifically, the United States
and Australia).
Original languageEnglish
Pages100-101
Number of pages2
Publication statusPublished - 2017
EventLaw and Society Association of Australia and New Zealand Conference 2017: A Meeting Place for Interdisciplinary Explorations of Justice - Otago University, Dunedin, New Zealand
Duration: 6 Dec 20179 Dec 2017
https://www.otago.ac.nz/lsaanz/index.html

Conference

ConferenceLaw and Society Association of Australia and New Zealand Conference 2017
Abbreviated titleLSAANZ
CountryNew Zealand
CityDunedin
Period6/12/179/12/17
Internet address

Fingerprint

mediation
justice
fairness
China
community
Society

Cite this

Wolski, B. (2017). Mediators and Substantive Justice: A Sociocultural Perspective. 100-101. Abstract from Law and Society Association of Australia and New Zealand Conference 2017, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Wolski, B. / Mediators and Substantive Justice: A Sociocultural Perspective. Abstract from Law and Society Association of Australia and New Zealand Conference 2017, Dunedin, New Zealand.2 p.
@conference{d4e440523d2f4f0592a98e83932f6bcc,
title = "Mediators and Substantive Justice: A Sociocultural Perspective",
abstract = "Disputing and dispute resolution are activities which are largely shaped by the cultural andsocial context within which they take place. Sociocultural forces influence the disputeresolution preferences of parties in conflict and the way in which particular dispute resolutionmethods – such as mediation - are perceived and practiced. These forces also impact the rolethat mediators are expected to play, if any, in attempting to influence the outcome of themediation such that ‘substantive justice’ or ‘fair outcomes’ are achieved. 101The link between culture, society, dispute resolution preferences and the mediator’s role andresponsibility for outcome fairness is clearly evident when one compares the mediationsystems of China and the West. In China, it is common for mediators to deliver lectures onmoral virtue and to express opinions about the desired outcome of mediation, that is, anoutcome that accords with community standards of fairness, preserves relationships andrestores social harmony. Chinese mediators are openly assertive in their efforts. Mediation inthe West serves a different function and takes a somewhat different form than mediation inChina. Although some ‘Western’ mediators in some mediations express an opinion as to thelikely outcome if the matter does not settle, such interventions are often frowned about. Theprevailing attitude in the West is that mediators are only responsible for process fairness, andnot for outcome fairness. This paper falls into two main parts. In the first part, the linkbetween culture, society and preference for dispute resolution methods is explored. Theimpact of culture and society on the purposes of mediation and the practice of mediationincluding acceptable mediator interventions, is discussed in the second part of the paper. Thepaper proceeds by way of a comparative analysis of the mediation of interpersonal disputesbetween individuals, in mainland China and the West (more specifically, the United Statesand Australia).",
author = "B Wolski",
year = "2017",
language = "English",
pages = "100--101",
note = "Law and Society Association of Australia and New Zealand Conference 2017 : A Meeting Place for Interdisciplinary Explorations of Justice , LSAANZ ; Conference date: 06-12-2017 Through 09-12-2017",
url = "https://www.otago.ac.nz/lsaanz/index.html",

}

Wolski, B 2017, 'Mediators and Substantive Justice: A Sociocultural Perspective' Law and Society Association of Australia and New Zealand Conference 2017, Dunedin, New Zealand, 6/12/17 - 9/12/17, pp. 100-101.

Mediators and Substantive Justice: A Sociocultural Perspective. / Wolski, B.

2017. 100-101 Abstract from Law and Society Association of Australia and New Zealand Conference 2017, Dunedin, New Zealand.

Research output: Contribution to conferenceAbstractResearchpeer-review

TY - CONF

T1 - Mediators and Substantive Justice: A Sociocultural Perspective

AU - Wolski, B

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Disputing and dispute resolution are activities which are largely shaped by the cultural andsocial context within which they take place. Sociocultural forces influence the disputeresolution preferences of parties in conflict and the way in which particular dispute resolutionmethods – such as mediation - are perceived and practiced. These forces also impact the rolethat mediators are expected to play, if any, in attempting to influence the outcome of themediation such that ‘substantive justice’ or ‘fair outcomes’ are achieved. 101The link between culture, society, dispute resolution preferences and the mediator’s role andresponsibility for outcome fairness is clearly evident when one compares the mediationsystems of China and the West. In China, it is common for mediators to deliver lectures onmoral virtue and to express opinions about the desired outcome of mediation, that is, anoutcome that accords with community standards of fairness, preserves relationships andrestores social harmony. Chinese mediators are openly assertive in their efforts. Mediation inthe West serves a different function and takes a somewhat different form than mediation inChina. Although some ‘Western’ mediators in some mediations express an opinion as to thelikely outcome if the matter does not settle, such interventions are often frowned about. Theprevailing attitude in the West is that mediators are only responsible for process fairness, andnot for outcome fairness. This paper falls into two main parts. In the first part, the linkbetween culture, society and preference for dispute resolution methods is explored. Theimpact of culture and society on the purposes of mediation and the practice of mediationincluding acceptable mediator interventions, is discussed in the second part of the paper. Thepaper proceeds by way of a comparative analysis of the mediation of interpersonal disputesbetween individuals, in mainland China and the West (more specifically, the United Statesand Australia).

AB - Disputing and dispute resolution are activities which are largely shaped by the cultural andsocial context within which they take place. Sociocultural forces influence the disputeresolution preferences of parties in conflict and the way in which particular dispute resolutionmethods – such as mediation - are perceived and practiced. These forces also impact the rolethat mediators are expected to play, if any, in attempting to influence the outcome of themediation such that ‘substantive justice’ or ‘fair outcomes’ are achieved. 101The link between culture, society, dispute resolution preferences and the mediator’s role andresponsibility for outcome fairness is clearly evident when one compares the mediationsystems of China and the West. In China, it is common for mediators to deliver lectures onmoral virtue and to express opinions about the desired outcome of mediation, that is, anoutcome that accords with community standards of fairness, preserves relationships andrestores social harmony. Chinese mediators are openly assertive in their efforts. Mediation inthe West serves a different function and takes a somewhat different form than mediation inChina. Although some ‘Western’ mediators in some mediations express an opinion as to thelikely outcome if the matter does not settle, such interventions are often frowned about. Theprevailing attitude in the West is that mediators are only responsible for process fairness, andnot for outcome fairness. This paper falls into two main parts. In the first part, the linkbetween culture, society and preference for dispute resolution methods is explored. Theimpact of culture and society on the purposes of mediation and the practice of mediationincluding acceptable mediator interventions, is discussed in the second part of the paper. Thepaper proceeds by way of a comparative analysis of the mediation of interpersonal disputesbetween individuals, in mainland China and the West (more specifically, the United Statesand Australia).

UR - https://www.otago.ac.nz/lsaanz/otago659604.pdf

UR - https://www.otago.ac.nz/lsaanz/programme-and-speakers/otago624521.html

UR - https://www.otago.ac.nz/lsaanz/otago670430.pdf

M3 - Abstract

SP - 100

EP - 101

ER -

Wolski B. Mediators and Substantive Justice: A Sociocultural Perspective. 2017. Abstract from Law and Society Association of Australia and New Zealand Conference 2017, Dunedin, New Zealand.