Media Coverage of the Benefits and Harms of Testing the Healthy: A protocol for a descriptive study

Mary O'Keeffe, Alexandra Barratt, Christopher Maher, Joshua Zadro, Alice Fabbri, Mark Jones, Ray Moynihan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

69 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Much testing in medicine is aimed at healthy people to facilitate the early detection of health conditions. However, there is growing evidence that early detection is a double-edged sword that may cause harm in the form of overdiagnosis. The media can be seen as a major generator of consumer demand for health services. Previous research shows that media coverage tends to overstate the benefits and downplay the harms of medical interventions for the sick, and often fails to cover relevant conflicts of interest of those promoting those interventions. However, little is known about how the benefits and harms of testing the healthy are covered by media. This study will examine the media coverage of the benefits and harms of testing the healthy, and coverage of potential conflicts of interest of those promoting the testing.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will examine five tests: 3D mammography for the early detection of breast cancer; blood liquid biopsy for the early detection of cancer; blood biomarker tests for the early detection of dementia; artificial intelligence technology for the early detection of dementia; and the Apple Watch Series 4 electrocardiogram sensor for the early detection of atrial fibrillation. We will identify media coverage using Google News and the LexisNexis and ProQuest electronic databases. Sets of two independent reviewers will conduct story screening and coding. We will include English language media stories referring to any of the five tests from January 2016 to May 2019. We will include media stories if they refer to any benefits or harms of the test for our conditions of interest. Data will be analysed using categorical data analysis and multinomial logistic regression.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No ethical approval is required for this study. Results will be presented at relevant scientific conferences and in peer-reviewed literature.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere029532
Pages (from-to)e029532
JournalBMJ Open
Volume9
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 24 Aug 2019

Fingerprint

Conflict of Interest
Early Detection of Cancer
Dementia
Artificial Intelligence
Hematologic Tests
Malus
Mammography
Atrial Fibrillation
Health Services
Electrocardiography
Language
Biomarkers
Logistic Models
Medicine
Databases
Breast Neoplasms
Technology
Biopsy
Health
Research

Cite this

O'Keeffe, Mary ; Barratt, Alexandra ; Maher, Christopher ; Zadro, Joshua ; Fabbri, Alice ; Jones, Mark ; Moynihan, Ray. / Media Coverage of the Benefits and Harms of Testing the Healthy : A protocol for a descriptive study. In: BMJ Open. 2019 ; Vol. 9, No. 8. pp. e029532.
@article{af0fd56d8d99418b93e8e7e78cca2dee,
title = "Media Coverage of the Benefits and Harms of Testing the Healthy: A protocol for a descriptive study",
abstract = "INTRODUCTION: Much testing in medicine is aimed at healthy people to facilitate the early detection of health conditions. However, there is growing evidence that early detection is a double-edged sword that may cause harm in the form of overdiagnosis. The media can be seen as a major generator of consumer demand for health services. Previous research shows that media coverage tends to overstate the benefits and downplay the harms of medical interventions for the sick, and often fails to cover relevant conflicts of interest of those promoting those interventions. However, little is known about how the benefits and harms of testing the healthy are covered by media. This study will examine the media coverage of the benefits and harms of testing the healthy, and coverage of potential conflicts of interest of those promoting the testing.METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will examine five tests: 3D mammography for the early detection of breast cancer; blood liquid biopsy for the early detection of cancer; blood biomarker tests for the early detection of dementia; artificial intelligence technology for the early detection of dementia; and the Apple Watch Series 4 electrocardiogram sensor for the early detection of atrial fibrillation. We will identify media coverage using Google News and the LexisNexis and ProQuest electronic databases. Sets of two independent reviewers will conduct story screening and coding. We will include English language media stories referring to any of the five tests from January 2016 to May 2019. We will include media stories if they refer to any benefits or harms of the test for our conditions of interest. Data will be analysed using categorical data analysis and multinomial logistic regression.ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No ethical approval is required for this study. Results will be presented at relevant scientific conferences and in peer-reviewed literature.",
author = "Mary O'Keeffe and Alexandra Barratt and Christopher Maher and Joshua Zadro and Alice Fabbri and Mark Jones and Ray Moynihan",
note = "{\circledC} Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.",
year = "2019",
month = "8",
day = "24",
doi = "10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029532",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "e029532",
journal = "BMJ Open",
issn = "2044-6055",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "8",

}

Media Coverage of the Benefits and Harms of Testing the Healthy : A protocol for a descriptive study. / O'Keeffe, Mary; Barratt, Alexandra; Maher, Christopher; Zadro, Joshua; Fabbri, Alice; Jones, Mark; Moynihan, Ray.

In: BMJ Open, Vol. 9, No. 8, e029532, 24.08.2019, p. e029532.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Media Coverage of the Benefits and Harms of Testing the Healthy

T2 - A protocol for a descriptive study

AU - O'Keeffe, Mary

AU - Barratt, Alexandra

AU - Maher, Christopher

AU - Zadro, Joshua

AU - Fabbri, Alice

AU - Jones, Mark

AU - Moynihan, Ray

N1 - © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

PY - 2019/8/24

Y1 - 2019/8/24

N2 - INTRODUCTION: Much testing in medicine is aimed at healthy people to facilitate the early detection of health conditions. However, there is growing evidence that early detection is a double-edged sword that may cause harm in the form of overdiagnosis. The media can be seen as a major generator of consumer demand for health services. Previous research shows that media coverage tends to overstate the benefits and downplay the harms of medical interventions for the sick, and often fails to cover relevant conflicts of interest of those promoting those interventions. However, little is known about how the benefits and harms of testing the healthy are covered by media. This study will examine the media coverage of the benefits and harms of testing the healthy, and coverage of potential conflicts of interest of those promoting the testing.METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will examine five tests: 3D mammography for the early detection of breast cancer; blood liquid biopsy for the early detection of cancer; blood biomarker tests for the early detection of dementia; artificial intelligence technology for the early detection of dementia; and the Apple Watch Series 4 electrocardiogram sensor for the early detection of atrial fibrillation. We will identify media coverage using Google News and the LexisNexis and ProQuest electronic databases. Sets of two independent reviewers will conduct story screening and coding. We will include English language media stories referring to any of the five tests from January 2016 to May 2019. We will include media stories if they refer to any benefits or harms of the test for our conditions of interest. Data will be analysed using categorical data analysis and multinomial logistic regression.ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No ethical approval is required for this study. Results will be presented at relevant scientific conferences and in peer-reviewed literature.

AB - INTRODUCTION: Much testing in medicine is aimed at healthy people to facilitate the early detection of health conditions. However, there is growing evidence that early detection is a double-edged sword that may cause harm in the form of overdiagnosis. The media can be seen as a major generator of consumer demand for health services. Previous research shows that media coverage tends to overstate the benefits and downplay the harms of medical interventions for the sick, and often fails to cover relevant conflicts of interest of those promoting those interventions. However, little is known about how the benefits and harms of testing the healthy are covered by media. This study will examine the media coverage of the benefits and harms of testing the healthy, and coverage of potential conflicts of interest of those promoting the testing.METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will examine five tests: 3D mammography for the early detection of breast cancer; blood liquid biopsy for the early detection of cancer; blood biomarker tests for the early detection of dementia; artificial intelligence technology for the early detection of dementia; and the Apple Watch Series 4 electrocardiogram sensor for the early detection of atrial fibrillation. We will identify media coverage using Google News and the LexisNexis and ProQuest electronic databases. Sets of two independent reviewers will conduct story screening and coding. We will include English language media stories referring to any of the five tests from January 2016 to May 2019. We will include media stories if they refer to any benefits or harms of the test for our conditions of interest. Data will be analysed using categorical data analysis and multinomial logistic regression.ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No ethical approval is required for this study. Results will be presented at relevant scientific conferences and in peer-reviewed literature.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071541744&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029532

DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029532

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - e029532

JO - BMJ Open

JF - BMJ Open

SN - 2044-6055

IS - 8

M1 - e029532

ER -