Measuring good architecture: Long life, loose fit, low energy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Good architecture is something that we all seek, but which is difficult to define. Sir Alexander John Gordon, in his role as
President of the Royal Institute of British Architects, defined ‘good architecture’ in 1972 as buildings that exhibit ‘long life,
loose fit and low energy’. These characteristics, nicknamed by Gordon as the 3L Principle, are measurable. Furthermore, life
cycle cost (LCC) provides a method for accessing the
economic contribution or burden created by buildings to the society they aim to serve. Yet there is no research available to
investigate the connection, if any, between 3L and LCC. It
might be hypothesised that buildings with a high 3L index have a low LCC profile. If this is true, then LCC may be able to
be used to assess ‘good architecture’.This paper uses a
case study methodology to assess the durability, adaptability and sustainability of 22 projects that have won architectural
design awards. The 3L criteria can bemeasured and
compared with average LCC per square metre using a long time horizon. The research is significant in that it tests a process
to objectively assess what is commonly intangible and to determine if LCC is a suitable predictor of ‘good architecture’.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)163-174
Number of pages12
JournalEuropean journal of sustainable development
Volume3
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Costs
Sustainable development
Durability

Cite this

@article{2c0baac0f096410e8913ebe3c8b9a3fa,
title = "Measuring good architecture: Long life, loose fit, low energy",
abstract = "Good architecture is something that we all seek, but which is difficult to define. Sir Alexander John Gordon, in his role asPresident of the Royal Institute of British Architects, defined ‘good architecture’ in 1972 as buildings that exhibit ‘long life,loose fit and low energy’. These characteristics, nicknamed by Gordon as the 3L Principle, are measurable. Furthermore, lifecycle cost (LCC) provides a method for accessing theeconomic contribution or burden created by buildings to the society they aim to serve. Yet there is no research available toinvestigate the connection, if any, between 3L and LCC. Itmight be hypothesised that buildings with a high 3L index have a low LCC profile. If this is true, then LCC may be able tobe used to assess ‘good architecture’.This paper uses acase study methodology to assess the durability, adaptability and sustainability of 22 projects that have won architecturaldesign awards. The 3L criteria can bemeasured andcompared with average LCC per square metre using a long time horizon. The research is significant in that it tests a processto objectively assess what is commonly intangible and to determine if LCC is a suitable predictor of ‘good architecture’.",
author = "Langston, {Craig Ashley}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.14207/ejsd.2014.v3n4p163",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "163--174",
journal = "European journal of sustainable development",
issn = "2239-5938",
number = "4",

}

Measuring good architecture : Long life, loose fit, low energy. / Langston, Craig Ashley.

In: European journal of sustainable development, Vol. 3, No. 4, 2014, p. 163-174.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measuring good architecture

T2 - Long life, loose fit, low energy

AU - Langston, Craig Ashley

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Good architecture is something that we all seek, but which is difficult to define. Sir Alexander John Gordon, in his role asPresident of the Royal Institute of British Architects, defined ‘good architecture’ in 1972 as buildings that exhibit ‘long life,loose fit and low energy’. These characteristics, nicknamed by Gordon as the 3L Principle, are measurable. Furthermore, lifecycle cost (LCC) provides a method for accessing theeconomic contribution or burden created by buildings to the society they aim to serve. Yet there is no research available toinvestigate the connection, if any, between 3L and LCC. Itmight be hypothesised that buildings with a high 3L index have a low LCC profile. If this is true, then LCC may be able tobe used to assess ‘good architecture’.This paper uses acase study methodology to assess the durability, adaptability and sustainability of 22 projects that have won architecturaldesign awards. The 3L criteria can bemeasured andcompared with average LCC per square metre using a long time horizon. The research is significant in that it tests a processto objectively assess what is commonly intangible and to determine if LCC is a suitable predictor of ‘good architecture’.

AB - Good architecture is something that we all seek, but which is difficult to define. Sir Alexander John Gordon, in his role asPresident of the Royal Institute of British Architects, defined ‘good architecture’ in 1972 as buildings that exhibit ‘long life,loose fit and low energy’. These characteristics, nicknamed by Gordon as the 3L Principle, are measurable. Furthermore, lifecycle cost (LCC) provides a method for accessing theeconomic contribution or burden created by buildings to the society they aim to serve. Yet there is no research available toinvestigate the connection, if any, between 3L and LCC. Itmight be hypothesised that buildings with a high 3L index have a low LCC profile. If this is true, then LCC may be able tobe used to assess ‘good architecture’.This paper uses acase study methodology to assess the durability, adaptability and sustainability of 22 projects that have won architecturaldesign awards. The 3L criteria can bemeasured andcompared with average LCC per square metre using a long time horizon. The research is significant in that it tests a processto objectively assess what is commonly intangible and to determine if LCC is a suitable predictor of ‘good architecture’.

U2 - 10.14207/ejsd.2014.v3n4p163

DO - 10.14207/ejsd.2014.v3n4p163

M3 - Article

VL - 3

SP - 163

EP - 174

JO - European journal of sustainable development

JF - European journal of sustainable development

SN - 2239-5938

IS - 4

ER -