Abstract
People can be inaccurate at matching unfamiliar faces shown in high-quality video images, even when viewpoint and facial expressions are closely matched. However, identification of highly familiar faces appears good, even when video quality is poor. Experiment 1 reported a direct comparison between familiar and unfamiliar faces. Participants who were personally familiar with target items appearing on video were highly accurate at a verification task. Unfamiliar participants doing the same task performed very inaccurately. Familiarity affected discriminability, but not bias. Experiments 2 and 3 showed that brief periods of familiarization have little beneficial effect unless "deep" or "social" processing is encouraged. The results show that video evidence can be used effectively as a probe to identity when the faces shown are highly familiar to observers, but caution should be used where images of unfamiliar people are being compared.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 207-218 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Journal | Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied |
| Volume | 7 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Sept 2001 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Matching identities of familiar and unfamiliar faces caught on CCTV images'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver