Mastery: The foundation of clinical competence

Patricia A Green, Tracy L. Nielson, Joanna Bishop

Research output: Contribution to conferencePresentationEducationpeer-review

Abstract

Introduction:
Historically, students undergo assessment of procedural skills (e.g., indwelling catheterisation, IV cannulation, IM
injection) during OSCE examinations. OSCE format however, provides limited sampling from the programmatic
blueprint and restricts the number of skills assessed each pre-clinical year of the medical curricula. We wanted to
ensure all students were competent in all procedures prior to their clinical years of training.
Methods:
We undertook a mastery approach to teaching procedural skills. Mastery was defined as a level of expected
proficiency (and safety), such that students undertook continual assessment (at a pass or fail level) to
demonstrate achieved ‘mastery’. Assessment involved demonstration of skill proficiency using 1:1 simulated
patient encounters with written (i.e., checklist, anecdotal etc) and oral feedback provided by experienced tutors.
Results:
We established this mastery approach to teaching procedural skills during 2013 in our medical program, and less
than 2% of students have required repeat attempts to demonstrate skill proficiency. Further, students have
reported that mastery assessments are less stressful than OSCE, and the personalised approach to teaching
makes them feel competent and more confident.
Conclusions:
Mastery approach to procedural skills provides a collaborative approach to teaching, learning and assessment
and ensures students are confident and proficient with procedural skills prior to clinical placements.
Take-home message:
The mastery approach to teaching procedural skills provides consistent and transparent assessment processes
and encourages collaboration rather than competition.
Original languageEnglish
Pages396
Number of pages1
Publication statusPublished - 2016
EventThe 17th Ottawa Conference and the ANZAHPE 2016 Conference - Perth Exhibition and Conference Centre, Perth, Australia
Duration: 19 Mar 201623 Mar 2016
Conference number: 17th
http://ottawa2016.com/

Conference

ConferenceThe 17th Ottawa Conference and the ANZAHPE 2016 Conference
CountryAustralia
CityPerth
Period19/03/1623/03/16
OtherThe continuum of healthcare professions education and assessment will be addressed, with sessions covering undergraduate, postgraduate and continuing education. The Conference provides the opportunity to focus on developments in the assessment of competence in medicine and the healthcare professions internationally by following the Ottawa streams, or to look more generally at education in the healthcare professions by following the ANZAHPE streams. All participants will have the opportunity through one joint registration to attend sessions in either stream depending on their interests and needs.

In this period of economic rationalisation of resources, increasing demands on healthcare delivery and the required provision of evidence of best utilisation of finite resources to deliver health care, what should be our expectations of our trainees and health professionals in the workplace? How can we promote and share best practice in education, in assessment and in the evaluation of our training programmes? The Conference will provide ample opportunities to present and exchange ideas and concepts with colleagues from across the world.
Internet address

Fingerprint

OSCE
student
Teaching
tutor
curriculum
examination
learning

Cite this

Green, P. A., Nielson, T. L., & Bishop, J. (2016). Mastery: The foundation of clinical competence. 396. The 17th Ottawa Conference and the ANZAHPE 2016 Conference, Perth, Australia.
Green, Patricia A ; Nielson, Tracy L. ; Bishop, Joanna . / Mastery: The foundation of clinical competence. The 17th Ottawa Conference and the ANZAHPE 2016 Conference, Perth, Australia.1 p.
@conference{0c13ce09ac76457f96383c351ccb2d9a,
title = "Mastery: The foundation of clinical competence",
abstract = "Introduction:Historically, students undergo assessment of procedural skills (e.g., indwelling catheterisation, IV cannulation, IMinjection) during OSCE examinations. OSCE format however, provides limited sampling from the programmaticblueprint and restricts the number of skills assessed each pre-clinical year of the medical curricula. We wanted toensure all students were competent in all procedures prior to their clinical years of training.Methods:We undertook a mastery approach to teaching procedural skills. Mastery was defined as a level of expectedproficiency (and safety), such that students undertook continual assessment (at a pass or fail level) todemonstrate achieved ‘mastery’. Assessment involved demonstration of skill proficiency using 1:1 simulatedpatient encounters with written (i.e., checklist, anecdotal etc) and oral feedback provided by experienced tutors.Results:We established this mastery approach to teaching procedural skills during 2013 in our medical program, and lessthan 2{\%} of students have required repeat attempts to demonstrate skill proficiency. Further, students havereported that mastery assessments are less stressful than OSCE, and the personalised approach to teachingmakes them feel competent and more confident.Conclusions:Mastery approach to procedural skills provides a collaborative approach to teaching, learning and assessmentand ensures students are confident and proficient with procedural skills prior to clinical placements.Take-home message:The mastery approach to teaching procedural skills provides consistent and transparent assessment processesand encourages collaboration rather than competition.",
author = "Green, {Patricia A} and Nielson, {Tracy L.} and Joanna Bishop",
year = "2016",
language = "English",
pages = "396",
note = "The 17th Ottawa Conference and the ANZAHPE 2016 Conference ; Conference date: 19-03-2016 Through 23-03-2016",
url = "http://ottawa2016.com/",

}

Green, PA, Nielson, TL & Bishop, J 2016, 'Mastery: The foundation of clinical competence' The 17th Ottawa Conference and the ANZAHPE 2016 Conference, Perth, Australia, 19/03/16 - 23/03/16, pp. 396.

Mastery: The foundation of clinical competence. / Green, Patricia A; Nielson, Tracy L.; Bishop, Joanna .

2016. 396 The 17th Ottawa Conference and the ANZAHPE 2016 Conference, Perth, Australia.

Research output: Contribution to conferencePresentationEducationpeer-review

TY - CONF

T1 - Mastery: The foundation of clinical competence

AU - Green, Patricia A

AU - Nielson, Tracy L.

AU - Bishop, Joanna

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Introduction:Historically, students undergo assessment of procedural skills (e.g., indwelling catheterisation, IV cannulation, IMinjection) during OSCE examinations. OSCE format however, provides limited sampling from the programmaticblueprint and restricts the number of skills assessed each pre-clinical year of the medical curricula. We wanted toensure all students were competent in all procedures prior to their clinical years of training.Methods:We undertook a mastery approach to teaching procedural skills. Mastery was defined as a level of expectedproficiency (and safety), such that students undertook continual assessment (at a pass or fail level) todemonstrate achieved ‘mastery’. Assessment involved demonstration of skill proficiency using 1:1 simulatedpatient encounters with written (i.e., checklist, anecdotal etc) and oral feedback provided by experienced tutors.Results:We established this mastery approach to teaching procedural skills during 2013 in our medical program, and lessthan 2% of students have required repeat attempts to demonstrate skill proficiency. Further, students havereported that mastery assessments are less stressful than OSCE, and the personalised approach to teachingmakes them feel competent and more confident.Conclusions:Mastery approach to procedural skills provides a collaborative approach to teaching, learning and assessmentand ensures students are confident and proficient with procedural skills prior to clinical placements.Take-home message:The mastery approach to teaching procedural skills provides consistent and transparent assessment processesand encourages collaboration rather than competition.

AB - Introduction:Historically, students undergo assessment of procedural skills (e.g., indwelling catheterisation, IV cannulation, IMinjection) during OSCE examinations. OSCE format however, provides limited sampling from the programmaticblueprint and restricts the number of skills assessed each pre-clinical year of the medical curricula. We wanted toensure all students were competent in all procedures prior to their clinical years of training.Methods:We undertook a mastery approach to teaching procedural skills. Mastery was defined as a level of expectedproficiency (and safety), such that students undertook continual assessment (at a pass or fail level) todemonstrate achieved ‘mastery’. Assessment involved demonstration of skill proficiency using 1:1 simulatedpatient encounters with written (i.e., checklist, anecdotal etc) and oral feedback provided by experienced tutors.Results:We established this mastery approach to teaching procedural skills during 2013 in our medical program, and lessthan 2% of students have required repeat attempts to demonstrate skill proficiency. Further, students havereported that mastery assessments are less stressful than OSCE, and the personalised approach to teachingmakes them feel competent and more confident.Conclusions:Mastery approach to procedural skills provides a collaborative approach to teaching, learning and assessmentand ensures students are confident and proficient with procedural skills prior to clinical placements.Take-home message:The mastery approach to teaching procedural skills provides consistent and transparent assessment processesand encourages collaboration rather than competition.

M3 - Presentation

SP - 396

ER -

Green PA, Nielson TL, Bishop J. Mastery: The foundation of clinical competence. 2016. The 17th Ottawa Conference and the ANZAHPE 2016 Conference, Perth, Australia.