Abstract
This paper explores the impact of market discipline on bank risk taking. We examine a broad sample of financial institutions from the G7 nations over the period 1996-2010. We apply System Generalized Method of Moments estimation to control for endogeneity and other unobserved heterogeneity in a dynamic panel setting. Our analysis suggests that market discipline helps reduce bank risk (both equity and credit risk). Moreover, we find that this negative impact of market discipline is stronger: (a) in the presence of a risk-adjusted insurance premium; and (b) during the post-global financial crisis period. However, the disciplinary effect of market discipline is not enhanced in the presence of bank capital. We highlight the policy implications of these findings.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 327-350 |
| Number of pages | 24 |
| Journal | Australian Journal of Management |
| Volume | 39 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Aug 2014 |
| Externally published | Yes |