Mapping of reporting guidance for systematic reviews and meta-analyses generated a comprehensive item bank for future reporting guidelines

Matthew J Page, Joanne E McKenzie, Patrick M Bossuyt, Isabelle Boutron, Tammy Hoffmann, Cynthia D Mulrow, Larissa Shamseer, David Moher

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To generate a comprehensive bank of systematic review (SR) reporting items to inform an update of the PRISMA 2009 statement.

METHODS: We searched the EQUATOR Network library in May 2019 to identify all reporting guidelines for SRs that were published after 2009, regardless of the scope of the guideline. We also conducted a selective review of four guidance manuals for SRs, three tools for assessing risk of bias in SRs, six meta-research studies evaluating the reporting quality of SRs using a tailored checklist, and five reporting guidelines for other study designs. One author screened and selected sources for inclusion, extracted reporting guidance from sources, and mapped guidance against the PRISMA 2009 checklist items.

RESULTS: We included 60 sources providing guidance on reporting of SRs and meta-analyses. From these, we collated a list of 221 unique reporting items. Items were categorised into title (four items), abstract (10 items), introduction (12 items), methods (111 items), results (61 items), discussion (12 items), funding and conflicts of interest (4 items), administrative information (3 items), and data availability (4 items). This exercise generated 175 reporting items that could be added to the guidance in the PRISMA 2009 statement.

CONCLUSIONS: Generation of a comprehensive item bank through review and mapping of the literature facilitates identification of missing items, and those needing modification, which may not otherwise be identified by the guideline development team or from other activities commonly used to develop reporting guidelines.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Clinical Epidemiology
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 15 Nov 2019

Fingerprint

Meta-Analysis
Guidelines
Checklist
Conflict of Interest
Libraries
Research

Cite this

Page, Matthew J ; McKenzie, Joanne E ; Bossuyt, Patrick M ; Boutron, Isabelle ; Hoffmann, Tammy ; Mulrow, Cynthia D ; Shamseer, Larissa ; Moher, David. / Mapping of reporting guidance for systematic reviews and meta-analyses generated a comprehensive item bank for future reporting guidelines. In: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2019.
@article{374763f46e4a4d05bb891bdb056a0ec0,
title = "Mapping of reporting guidance for systematic reviews and meta-analyses generated a comprehensive item bank for future reporting guidelines",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: To generate a comprehensive bank of systematic review (SR) reporting items to inform an update of the PRISMA 2009 statement.METHODS: We searched the EQUATOR Network library in May 2019 to identify all reporting guidelines for SRs that were published after 2009, regardless of the scope of the guideline. We also conducted a selective review of four guidance manuals for SRs, three tools for assessing risk of bias in SRs, six meta-research studies evaluating the reporting quality of SRs using a tailored checklist, and five reporting guidelines for other study designs. One author screened and selected sources for inclusion, extracted reporting guidance from sources, and mapped guidance against the PRISMA 2009 checklist items.RESULTS: We included 60 sources providing guidance on reporting of SRs and meta-analyses. From these, we collated a list of 221 unique reporting items. Items were categorised into title (four items), abstract (10 items), introduction (12 items), methods (111 items), results (61 items), discussion (12 items), funding and conflicts of interest (4 items), administrative information (3 items), and data availability (4 items). This exercise generated 175 reporting items that could be added to the guidance in the PRISMA 2009 statement.CONCLUSIONS: Generation of a comprehensive item bank through review and mapping of the literature facilitates identification of missing items, and those needing modification, which may not otherwise be identified by the guideline development team or from other activities commonly used to develop reporting guidelines.",
author = "Page, {Matthew J} and McKenzie, {Joanne E} and Bossuyt, {Patrick M} and Isabelle Boutron and Tammy Hoffmann and Mulrow, {Cynthia D} and Larissa Shamseer and David Moher",
note = "Copyright {\circledC} 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.",
year = "2019",
month = "11",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.11.010",
language = "English",
journal = "Journal of Chronic Diseases",
issn = "0895-4356",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Mapping of reporting guidance for systematic reviews and meta-analyses generated a comprehensive item bank for future reporting guidelines. / Page, Matthew J; McKenzie, Joanne E; Bossuyt, Patrick M; Boutron, Isabelle; Hoffmann, Tammy; Mulrow, Cynthia D; Shamseer, Larissa; Moher, David.

In: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 15.11.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mapping of reporting guidance for systematic reviews and meta-analyses generated a comprehensive item bank for future reporting guidelines

AU - Page, Matthew J

AU - McKenzie, Joanne E

AU - Bossuyt, Patrick M

AU - Boutron, Isabelle

AU - Hoffmann, Tammy

AU - Mulrow, Cynthia D

AU - Shamseer, Larissa

AU - Moher, David

N1 - Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

PY - 2019/11/15

Y1 - 2019/11/15

N2 - OBJECTIVES: To generate a comprehensive bank of systematic review (SR) reporting items to inform an update of the PRISMA 2009 statement.METHODS: We searched the EQUATOR Network library in May 2019 to identify all reporting guidelines for SRs that were published after 2009, regardless of the scope of the guideline. We also conducted a selective review of four guidance manuals for SRs, three tools for assessing risk of bias in SRs, six meta-research studies evaluating the reporting quality of SRs using a tailored checklist, and five reporting guidelines for other study designs. One author screened and selected sources for inclusion, extracted reporting guidance from sources, and mapped guidance against the PRISMA 2009 checklist items.RESULTS: We included 60 sources providing guidance on reporting of SRs and meta-analyses. From these, we collated a list of 221 unique reporting items. Items were categorised into title (four items), abstract (10 items), introduction (12 items), methods (111 items), results (61 items), discussion (12 items), funding and conflicts of interest (4 items), administrative information (3 items), and data availability (4 items). This exercise generated 175 reporting items that could be added to the guidance in the PRISMA 2009 statement.CONCLUSIONS: Generation of a comprehensive item bank through review and mapping of the literature facilitates identification of missing items, and those needing modification, which may not otherwise be identified by the guideline development team or from other activities commonly used to develop reporting guidelines.

AB - OBJECTIVES: To generate a comprehensive bank of systematic review (SR) reporting items to inform an update of the PRISMA 2009 statement.METHODS: We searched the EQUATOR Network library in May 2019 to identify all reporting guidelines for SRs that were published after 2009, regardless of the scope of the guideline. We also conducted a selective review of four guidance manuals for SRs, three tools for assessing risk of bias in SRs, six meta-research studies evaluating the reporting quality of SRs using a tailored checklist, and five reporting guidelines for other study designs. One author screened and selected sources for inclusion, extracted reporting guidance from sources, and mapped guidance against the PRISMA 2009 checklist items.RESULTS: We included 60 sources providing guidance on reporting of SRs and meta-analyses. From these, we collated a list of 221 unique reporting items. Items were categorised into title (four items), abstract (10 items), introduction (12 items), methods (111 items), results (61 items), discussion (12 items), funding and conflicts of interest (4 items), administrative information (3 items), and data availability (4 items). This exercise generated 175 reporting items that could be added to the guidance in the PRISMA 2009 statement.CONCLUSIONS: Generation of a comprehensive item bank through review and mapping of the literature facilitates identification of missing items, and those needing modification, which may not otherwise be identified by the guideline development team or from other activities commonly used to develop reporting guidelines.

U2 - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.11.010

DO - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.11.010

M3 - Article

JO - Journal of Chronic Diseases

JF - Journal of Chronic Diseases

SN - 0895-4356

ER -