Management control in family firms: a guest editorial

Martin R.W. Hiebl, Martin Quinn, Justin B. Craig, Ken Moores

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialResearchpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

[Extract] Family firms have received significantly higher levels of attention in business and management research in recent years (e.g., Daspit et al. 2017; Gedajlovic et al. 2012; Sharma 2017). Some scholars even report on an “explosive growth of interest in family business studies in the past decade” (Sharma et al. 2017, p. 316). Accounting research has been somewhat slower in examining the specifics of family firms. From a life-cycle perspective, accounting research on family firms is still in its infancy. Nevertheless, recent studies underpin that when it comes to accounting—and in particular, to management accounting and control—family firms display some distinctive features. For instance, recent reviews on accounting in family firms note that they show lower levels of formalization of accounting and control practices, exhibit specific and additional roles of accounting and control practices, and differ from non-family firms in important accounting choices such as earnings management (Helsen et al. 2017; Prencipe et al. 2014; Salvato and Moores 2010; Senftlechner and Hiebl 2015; Songini et al. 2013).
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)377-381
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Management Control
Volume28
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2018

Fingerprint

Life cycle
Industry
Management control
Family firms
Accounting research
Earnings management
Accounting choice
Management accounting
Business research
Business studies
Management research
Family business
Formalization

Cite this

Hiebl, Martin R.W. ; Quinn, Martin ; Craig, Justin B. ; Moores, Ken. / Management control in family firms : a guest editorial. In: Journal of Management Control. 2018 ; Vol. 28, No. 4. pp. 377-381.
@article{49eb7271604e45799c2f89cb84500c39,
title = "Management control in family firms: a guest editorial",
abstract = "[Extract] Family firms have received significantly higher levels of attention in business and management research in recent years (e.g., Daspit et al. 2017; Gedajlovic et al. 2012; Sharma 2017). Some scholars even report on an “explosive growth of interest in family business studies in the past decade” (Sharma et al. 2017, p. 316). Accounting research has been somewhat slower in examining the specifics of family firms. From a life-cycle perspective, accounting research on family firms is still in its infancy. Nevertheless, recent studies underpin that when it comes to accounting—and in particular, to management accounting and control—family firms display some distinctive features. For instance, recent reviews on accounting in family firms note that they show lower levels of formalization of accounting and control practices, exhibit specific and additional roles of accounting and control practices, and differ from non-family firms in important accounting choices such as earnings management (Helsen et al. 2017; Prencipe et al. 2014; Salvato and Moores 2010; Senftlechner and Hiebl 2015; Songini et al. 2013).",
author = "Hiebl, {Martin R.W.} and Martin Quinn and Craig, {Justin B.} and Ken Moores",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00187-018-0260-6",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "377--381",
journal = "Journal of Management Control",
issn = "2191-4761",
publisher = "Physica Verlag",
number = "4",

}

Management control in family firms : a guest editorial. / Hiebl, Martin R.W.; Quinn, Martin; Craig, Justin B.; Moores, Ken.

In: Journal of Management Control, Vol. 28, No. 4, 01.02.2018, p. 377-381.

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Management control in family firms

T2 - a guest editorial

AU - Hiebl, Martin R.W.

AU - Quinn, Martin

AU - Craig, Justin B.

AU - Moores, Ken

PY - 2018/2/1

Y1 - 2018/2/1

N2 - [Extract] Family firms have received significantly higher levels of attention in business and management research in recent years (e.g., Daspit et al. 2017; Gedajlovic et al. 2012; Sharma 2017). Some scholars even report on an “explosive growth of interest in family business studies in the past decade” (Sharma et al. 2017, p. 316). Accounting research has been somewhat slower in examining the specifics of family firms. From a life-cycle perspective, accounting research on family firms is still in its infancy. Nevertheless, recent studies underpin that when it comes to accounting—and in particular, to management accounting and control—family firms display some distinctive features. For instance, recent reviews on accounting in family firms note that they show lower levels of formalization of accounting and control practices, exhibit specific and additional roles of accounting and control practices, and differ from non-family firms in important accounting choices such as earnings management (Helsen et al. 2017; Prencipe et al. 2014; Salvato and Moores 2010; Senftlechner and Hiebl 2015; Songini et al. 2013).

AB - [Extract] Family firms have received significantly higher levels of attention in business and management research in recent years (e.g., Daspit et al. 2017; Gedajlovic et al. 2012; Sharma 2017). Some scholars even report on an “explosive growth of interest in family business studies in the past decade” (Sharma et al. 2017, p. 316). Accounting research has been somewhat slower in examining the specifics of family firms. From a life-cycle perspective, accounting research on family firms is still in its infancy. Nevertheless, recent studies underpin that when it comes to accounting—and in particular, to management accounting and control—family firms display some distinctive features. For instance, recent reviews on accounting in family firms note that they show lower levels of formalization of accounting and control practices, exhibit specific and additional roles of accounting and control practices, and differ from non-family firms in important accounting choices such as earnings management (Helsen et al. 2017; Prencipe et al. 2014; Salvato and Moores 2010; Senftlechner and Hiebl 2015; Songini et al. 2013).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041527913&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00187-018-0260-6

DO - 10.1007/s00187-018-0260-6

M3 - Editorial

VL - 28

SP - 377

EP - 381

JO - Journal of Management Control

JF - Journal of Management Control

SN - 2191-4761

IS - 4

ER -