Making climate science matter in the courtroom

Nicole Rogers*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)


The author draws upon case studies from Australian coalmine litigation in order to highlight some of the ongoing structural and procedural difficulties in addressing climate change within the restrictive parameters of Australian environmental law. There is a fundamental incongruence between the practical outcomes of such litigation and scientific findings and predictions in relation to the catastrophic consequences of the global failure to address climate change. By way of contrast, alternative forms of climate change litigation which have arisen in other jurisdictions, including tort-based litigation, atmospheric public trust litigation, civil and constitutional rights litigation and the strategic deployment of the criminal defence of necessity, offer interesting possibilities and more compelling narrative frameworks for making climate science matter in the courtroom.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)475-487
Number of pages13
JournalEnvironmental and Planning Law Journal
Issue number6
Publication statusPublished - 2017
Externally publishedYes


Dive into the research topics of 'Making climate science matter in the courtroom'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this