“Luck of the draw really”: a qualitative exploration of Australian trainee doctors’ experiences of mandatory research

Caitlin Brandenburg*, Joanne Hilder, Christy Noble, Rhea Liang, Kirsty A T Forrest, Hitesh Joshi, Gerben B.J.M. Keijzers, Sharon M Mickan, David Pearson, Ian A. Scott, Emma Veysey, Paulie Stehlik

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many medical trainees, prior to achieving specialist status, are required to complete a mandatory research project, the usefulness of which has been debated. The aim of this study was to gain an in-depth understanding of trainees' experiences and satisfaction of conducting such research projects in Australia.

METHODS: A qualitative descriptive approach was used. Semi-structured interviews with trainees were undertaken between May 2021 and June 2022. Australian medical trainees who had completed a research project as part of specialty training within the past five years were invited to participate. The purposive sample was drawn from participants in a survey on the same topic who had indicated interest in participating in an interview. Interviews explored trainees' overall experience of and satisfaction with conducting research projects, as well as their perceptions of research training, support, barriers, enablers, and perceived benefits. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and thematically analysed.

RESULTS: Sixteen medical doctors from seven medical colleges were interviewed. Trainee experience and satisfaction was highly variable between participants and was shaped by four factors: 1) trainees entered their specialty training with their own perspectives on the value and purpose of the research project, informed by their previous experiences with research and perceived importance of research in their planned career path; 2) in conducting the project, enablers including protected time, supervisor support and institutional structures, were vital to shaping their experience; 3) trainees' access to these enablers was variable, mediated by a combination of luck, and the trainees' own drive and research skill; and 4) project outcomes, in terms of research merit, learning, career benefits and impacts on patient care.

CONCLUSIONS: Trainee experiences of doing research were mixed, with positive experiences often attributed to chance rather than an intentionally structured learning experience. We believe alternatives to mandatory trainee research projects must be explored, including recognising other forms of research learning activities, and directing scarce resources to supporting the few trainees who plan to pursue clinician researcher careers.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1021
Pages (from-to)1-11
Number of pages11
JournalBMC Medical Education
Volume24
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 18 Sept 2024

Cite this