Low back pain in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the effectiveness of conservative interventions

Zoe A. Michaleff, Steven J. Kamper, Christopher G. Maher, Roni Evans, Carolyn Broderick, Nicholas Henschke

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

38 Citations (Scopus)
2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Purpose: To identify and evaluate the effectiveness of conservative treatment approaches used in children and adolescents to manage and prevent low back pain (LBP).

Methods: Five electronic databases and the reference lists of systematic reviews were searched for relevant studies. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were considered eligible for inclusion if they enrolled a sample of children or adolescents (<18 years old) and evaluated the effectiveness of any conservative intervention to treat or prevent LBP. Two authors independently screened search results, extracted data, assessed risk of bias using the PEDro scale, and rated the quality of evidence using the GRADE criteria.

Results: Four RCTs on intervention and eleven RCTs on prevention of LBP were included. All included studies had a high risk of bias scoring ≤7 on the PEDro scale. For the treatment of LBP, a supervised exercise program compared to no treatment improved the average pain intensity over the past month by 2.9 points (95 % CI 1.6–4.1) measured by a 0–10 scale (2 studies; n = 125). For the prevention of LBP, there was moderate quality evidence to suggest back education and promotion programs are not effective in reducing LBP prevalence in children and adolescents.

Conclusions: While exercise interventions appear to be promising to treat LBP in children and adolescents, there is a dearth of research data relevant to paediatric populations. Future studies conducted in children and adolescents with LBP should incorporate what has been learnt from adult LBP research and be of rigorous methodological quality.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2046-2058
Number of pages13
JournalEuropean Spine Journal
Volume23
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 27 Sep 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Low Back Pain
Meta-Analysis
Randomized Controlled Trials
Exercise
Research
Databases
Pediatrics
Education
Pain
Therapeutics

Cite this

Michaleff, Zoe A. ; Kamper, Steven J. ; Maher, Christopher G. ; Evans, Roni ; Broderick, Carolyn ; Henschke, Nicholas. / Low back pain in children and adolescents : a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the effectiveness of conservative interventions. In: European Spine Journal. 2014 ; Vol. 23, No. 10. pp. 2046-2058.
@article{1c6aa63cebe74bcbace0e64e16e313f0,
title = "Low back pain in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the effectiveness of conservative interventions",
abstract = "Purpose: To identify and evaluate the effectiveness of conservative treatment approaches used in children and adolescents to manage and prevent low back pain (LBP).Methods: Five electronic databases and the reference lists of systematic reviews were searched for relevant studies. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were considered eligible for inclusion if they enrolled a sample of children or adolescents (<18 years old) and evaluated the effectiveness of any conservative intervention to treat or prevent LBP. Two authors independently screened search results, extracted data, assessed risk of bias using the PEDro scale, and rated the quality of evidence using the GRADE criteria.Results: Four RCTs on intervention and eleven RCTs on prevention of LBP were included. All included studies had a high risk of bias scoring ≤7 on the PEDro scale. For the treatment of LBP, a supervised exercise program compared to no treatment improved the average pain intensity over the past month by 2.9 points (95 {\%} CI 1.6–4.1) measured by a 0–10 scale (2 studies; n = 125). For the prevention of LBP, there was moderate quality evidence to suggest back education and promotion programs are not effective in reducing LBP prevalence in children and adolescents.Conclusions: While exercise interventions appear to be promising to treat LBP in children and adolescents, there is a dearth of research data relevant to paediatric populations. Future studies conducted in children and adolescents with LBP should incorporate what has been learnt from adult LBP research and be of rigorous methodological quality.",
author = "Michaleff, {Zoe A.} and Kamper, {Steven J.} and Maher, {Christopher G.} and Roni Evans and Carolyn Broderick and Nicholas Henschke",
year = "2014",
month = "9",
day = "27",
doi = "10.1007/s00586-014-3461-1",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "2046--2058",
journal = "European Spine Journal",
issn = "0940-6719",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "10",

}

Low back pain in children and adolescents : a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the effectiveness of conservative interventions. / Michaleff, Zoe A.; Kamper, Steven J.; Maher, Christopher G.; Evans, Roni; Broderick, Carolyn; Henschke, Nicholas.

In: European Spine Journal, Vol. 23, No. 10, 27.09.2014, p. 2046-2058.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Low back pain in children and adolescents

T2 - a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the effectiveness of conservative interventions

AU - Michaleff, Zoe A.

AU - Kamper, Steven J.

AU - Maher, Christopher G.

AU - Evans, Roni

AU - Broderick, Carolyn

AU - Henschke, Nicholas

PY - 2014/9/27

Y1 - 2014/9/27

N2 - Purpose: To identify and evaluate the effectiveness of conservative treatment approaches used in children and adolescents to manage and prevent low back pain (LBP).Methods: Five electronic databases and the reference lists of systematic reviews were searched for relevant studies. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were considered eligible for inclusion if they enrolled a sample of children or adolescents (<18 years old) and evaluated the effectiveness of any conservative intervention to treat or prevent LBP. Two authors independently screened search results, extracted data, assessed risk of bias using the PEDro scale, and rated the quality of evidence using the GRADE criteria.Results: Four RCTs on intervention and eleven RCTs on prevention of LBP were included. All included studies had a high risk of bias scoring ≤7 on the PEDro scale. For the treatment of LBP, a supervised exercise program compared to no treatment improved the average pain intensity over the past month by 2.9 points (95 % CI 1.6–4.1) measured by a 0–10 scale (2 studies; n = 125). For the prevention of LBP, there was moderate quality evidence to suggest back education and promotion programs are not effective in reducing LBP prevalence in children and adolescents.Conclusions: While exercise interventions appear to be promising to treat LBP in children and adolescents, there is a dearth of research data relevant to paediatric populations. Future studies conducted in children and adolescents with LBP should incorporate what has been learnt from adult LBP research and be of rigorous methodological quality.

AB - Purpose: To identify and evaluate the effectiveness of conservative treatment approaches used in children and adolescents to manage and prevent low back pain (LBP).Methods: Five electronic databases and the reference lists of systematic reviews were searched for relevant studies. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were considered eligible for inclusion if they enrolled a sample of children or adolescents (<18 years old) and evaluated the effectiveness of any conservative intervention to treat or prevent LBP. Two authors independently screened search results, extracted data, assessed risk of bias using the PEDro scale, and rated the quality of evidence using the GRADE criteria.Results: Four RCTs on intervention and eleven RCTs on prevention of LBP were included. All included studies had a high risk of bias scoring ≤7 on the PEDro scale. For the treatment of LBP, a supervised exercise program compared to no treatment improved the average pain intensity over the past month by 2.9 points (95 % CI 1.6–4.1) measured by a 0–10 scale (2 studies; n = 125). For the prevention of LBP, there was moderate quality evidence to suggest back education and promotion programs are not effective in reducing LBP prevalence in children and adolescents.Conclusions: While exercise interventions appear to be promising to treat LBP in children and adolescents, there is a dearth of research data relevant to paediatric populations. Future studies conducted in children and adolescents with LBP should incorporate what has been learnt from adult LBP research and be of rigorous methodological quality.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84919334038&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00586-014-3461-1

DO - 10.1007/s00586-014-3461-1

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 2046

EP - 2058

JO - European Spine Journal

JF - European Spine Journal

SN - 0940-6719

IS - 10

ER -