Learning complex sequences: No role for observation?

Stephen W. Kelly*, A. Mike Burton

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

41 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Two experiments examined performance in a sequence learning task. Participants were trained on a repeating sequence which was presented as a visual display and learning was measured via the increase in reaction time to respond to a new sequence. Some participants made a response to each stimulus while others merely observed the sequence. In Experiment 1 participants responding to the display via a keypress showed learning, but those merely observing did not. Five possible reasons for the failure to find observational learning were considered and the Experiment 2 attempted to resolve these. This second experiment confirmed the findings of Experiment 1 in a non-spatial sequence display using a cover story which encouraged attention to the display but not rule-search strategies. The results are discussed in relation to applied and theoretical aspects of implicit learning.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)15-23
Number of pages9
JournalPsychological Research
Volume65
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Learning complex sequences: No role for observation?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this