“Lagom jurisdiction” – What viking drinking etiquette can teach us about internet jurisdiction and google France

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The law of Internet jurisdiction is facing a crisis. While there is widespread and growing recognition that we cannot anchor Internet jurisdiction in the outdated, typically overstated, and often misunderstood, territoriality principle, few realistic alternatives have been advanced so far. This article seeks to provide an insight into the conceptual mess that is the international law on jurisdiction; focusing specifically on the concepts of sovereignty and jurisdiction, with limited attention also given to the impact of comity, and international human rights law. These issues are studied through the lens of the so-called Google France case that comes before the CJEU in 2018. The article argues that we may usefully turn to the Swedish “lagom” concept – which allegedly stems from Viking era drinking etiquette – as a guiding principle for how we approach Internet jurisdiction.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)29-47
Number of pages19
JournalMasaryk University Journal of Law and Technology
Volume12
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2018

Fingerprint

search engine
jurisdiction
France
Internet
International law
Anchors
Lenses
Law
international law
sovereignty
human rights

Cite this

@article{daae4c67d7fc46bab868c25d6a914043,
title = "“Lagom jurisdiction” – What viking drinking etiquette can teach us about internet jurisdiction and google France",
abstract = "The law of Internet jurisdiction is facing a crisis. While there is widespread and growing recognition that we cannot anchor Internet jurisdiction in the outdated, typically overstated, and often misunderstood, territoriality principle, few realistic alternatives have been advanced so far. This article seeks to provide an insight into the conceptual mess that is the international law on jurisdiction; focusing specifically on the concepts of sovereignty and jurisdiction, with limited attention also given to the impact of comity, and international human rights law. These issues are studied through the lens of the so-called Google France case that comes before the CJEU in 2018. The article argues that we may usefully turn to the Swedish “lagom” concept – which allegedly stems from Viking era drinking etiquette – as a guiding principle for how we approach Internet jurisdiction.",
author = "Svantesson, {Dan Jerker B.}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5817/MUJLT2018-1-2",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "29--47",
journal = "Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology",
issn = "1802-5943",
publisher = "Faculty of Law, Masaryk University",
number = "1",

}

“Lagom jurisdiction” – What viking drinking etiquette can teach us about internet jurisdiction and google France. / Svantesson, Dan Jerker B.

In: Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology, Vol. 12, No. 1, 01.01.2018, p. 29-47.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - “Lagom jurisdiction” – What viking drinking etiquette can teach us about internet jurisdiction and google France

AU - Svantesson, Dan Jerker B.

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - The law of Internet jurisdiction is facing a crisis. While there is widespread and growing recognition that we cannot anchor Internet jurisdiction in the outdated, typically overstated, and often misunderstood, territoriality principle, few realistic alternatives have been advanced so far. This article seeks to provide an insight into the conceptual mess that is the international law on jurisdiction; focusing specifically on the concepts of sovereignty and jurisdiction, with limited attention also given to the impact of comity, and international human rights law. These issues are studied through the lens of the so-called Google France case that comes before the CJEU in 2018. The article argues that we may usefully turn to the Swedish “lagom” concept – which allegedly stems from Viking era drinking etiquette – as a guiding principle for how we approach Internet jurisdiction.

AB - The law of Internet jurisdiction is facing a crisis. While there is widespread and growing recognition that we cannot anchor Internet jurisdiction in the outdated, typically overstated, and often misunderstood, territoriality principle, few realistic alternatives have been advanced so far. This article seeks to provide an insight into the conceptual mess that is the international law on jurisdiction; focusing specifically on the concepts of sovereignty and jurisdiction, with limited attention also given to the impact of comity, and international human rights law. These issues are studied through the lens of the so-called Google France case that comes before the CJEU in 2018. The article argues that we may usefully turn to the Swedish “lagom” concept – which allegedly stems from Viking era drinking etiquette – as a guiding principle for how we approach Internet jurisdiction.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049671732&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5817/MUJLT2018-1-2

DO - 10.5817/MUJLT2018-1-2

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 29

EP - 47

JO - Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology

JF - Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology

SN - 1802-5943

IS - 1

ER -