‘Knowledge versus skills: a false dichotomy in the teaching of oral advocacy in moot court’ at Australian Law Academic Association Annual Conference, 4 – 6 July 2021

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperEducation

Abstract

This paper originated in my own experience of when students have had the most academic benefit (learn the most), and that was when they were on competitive moot teams. Over the past 12 years, I have coached more than 25 teams for competitions. I also draw on my background as a practitioner, a teacher of Priestley
11 and elective law subjects, and my current role as Associate Dean, which provides the bigger picture perspectives of academic law school administration and the role of law schools.
Over the years, students who have completed a competitive moot, have reported how much they have learned, that after the moot, law school was so much easier, that it changed everything for them. My personal anecdotal evidence is also supported by the literature on the benefits of mooting, and by the continued
increase in popularity of moot competitions.
Original languageEnglish
Pages1-5
Number of pages5
Publication statusUnpublished - Jul 2021
EventAustralian Law Academic Association Annual Conference, 4 – 6 July 2021 - Sydney and Online
Duration: 4 Jul 20216 Jul 2021
https://law-events.sydney.edu.au/events/alaa-conference

Conference

ConferenceAustralian Law Academic Association Annual Conference, 4 – 6 July 2021
Period4/07/216/07/21
Internet address

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '‘Knowledge versus skills: a false dichotomy in the teaching of oral advocacy in moot court’ at Australian Law Academic Association Annual Conference, 4 – 6 July 2021'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this