Kinetic and training comparisons between assisted, resisted, and free countermovement jumps

Christos K Argus, Nicholas D Gill, Justin Wl Keogh, Anthony J Blazevich, Will G Hopkins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

37 Citations (Scopus)
75 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Elastic band assisted and resisted jump training may be a novel way to develop lower-body power. The purpose of this investigation was to (a) determine the kinetic differences between assisted, free, and resisted countermovement jumps and (b), investigate the effects of contrast training using either assisted, free, or resisted countermovement jump training on vertical jump performance in well-trained athletes. In part 1, 8 recreationally trained men were assessed for force output, relative peak power (PP·kg(-1)) and peak velocity during the 3 types of jump. The highest peak force was achieved in the resisted jump method, while PP·kg(-1) and peak velocity were greatest in the assisted jump. Each type of jump produced a different pattern of maximal values of the variables measured, which may have implications for developing separate components of muscular power. In part 2, 28 professional rugby players were assessed for vertical jump height before and after 4 weeks of either assisted (n = 9), resisted (n = 11), or free (n = 8) countermovement jump training. Relative to changes in the control group (1.3 ± 9.2%, mean ± SD), there were clear small improvements in jump height in the assisted (6.7 ± 9.6%) and the resisted jump training group (4.0 ± 8.8%). Elastic band assisted and resisted jump training are both effective methods for improving jump height and can be easily implemented into current training programs via contrast training methods or as a part of plyometric training sessions. Assisted and resisted jump training is recommended for athletes in whom explosive lower-body movements such as jumping and sprinting are performed as part of competition.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2219-27
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Volume25
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2011

Fingerprint

Athletes
Plyometric Exercise
Football
Education
Control Groups

Cite this

Argus, Christos K ; Gill, Nicholas D ; Keogh, Justin Wl ; Blazevich, Anthony J ; Hopkins, Will G. / Kinetic and training comparisons between assisted, resisted, and free countermovement jumps. In: Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2011 ; Vol. 25, No. 8. pp. 2219-27.
@article{e102740230594488aef66c2819da9acb,
title = "Kinetic and training comparisons between assisted, resisted, and free countermovement jumps",
abstract = "Elastic band assisted and resisted jump training may be a novel way to develop lower-body power. The purpose of this investigation was to (a) determine the kinetic differences between assisted, free, and resisted countermovement jumps and (b), investigate the effects of contrast training using either assisted, free, or resisted countermovement jump training on vertical jump performance in well-trained athletes. In part 1, 8 recreationally trained men were assessed for force output, relative peak power (PP·kg(-1)) and peak velocity during the 3 types of jump. The highest peak force was achieved in the resisted jump method, while PP·kg(-1) and peak velocity were greatest in the assisted jump. Each type of jump produced a different pattern of maximal values of the variables measured, which may have implications for developing separate components of muscular power. In part 2, 28 professional rugby players were assessed for vertical jump height before and after 4 weeks of either assisted (n = 9), resisted (n = 11), or free (n = 8) countermovement jump training. Relative to changes in the control group (1.3 ± 9.2{\%}, mean ± SD), there were clear small improvements in jump height in the assisted (6.7 ± 9.6{\%}) and the resisted jump training group (4.0 ± 8.8{\%}). Elastic band assisted and resisted jump training are both effective methods for improving jump height and can be easily implemented into current training programs via contrast training methods or as a part of plyometric training sessions. Assisted and resisted jump training is recommended for athletes in whom explosive lower-body movements such as jumping and sprinting are performed as part of competition.",
author = "Argus, {Christos K} and Gill, {Nicholas D} and Keogh, {Justin Wl} and Blazevich, {Anthony J} and Hopkins, {Will G}",
year = "2011",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181f6b0f4",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "2219--27",
journal = "Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research",
issn = "1064-8011",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams & Wilkins",
number = "8",

}

Kinetic and training comparisons between assisted, resisted, and free countermovement jumps. / Argus, Christos K; Gill, Nicholas D; Keogh, Justin Wl; Blazevich, Anthony J; Hopkins, Will G.

In: Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, Vol. 25, No. 8, 08.2011, p. 2219-27.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Kinetic and training comparisons between assisted, resisted, and free countermovement jumps

AU - Argus, Christos K

AU - Gill, Nicholas D

AU - Keogh, Justin Wl

AU - Blazevich, Anthony J

AU - Hopkins, Will G

PY - 2011/8

Y1 - 2011/8

N2 - Elastic band assisted and resisted jump training may be a novel way to develop lower-body power. The purpose of this investigation was to (a) determine the kinetic differences between assisted, free, and resisted countermovement jumps and (b), investigate the effects of contrast training using either assisted, free, or resisted countermovement jump training on vertical jump performance in well-trained athletes. In part 1, 8 recreationally trained men were assessed for force output, relative peak power (PP·kg(-1)) and peak velocity during the 3 types of jump. The highest peak force was achieved in the resisted jump method, while PP·kg(-1) and peak velocity were greatest in the assisted jump. Each type of jump produced a different pattern of maximal values of the variables measured, which may have implications for developing separate components of muscular power. In part 2, 28 professional rugby players were assessed for vertical jump height before and after 4 weeks of either assisted (n = 9), resisted (n = 11), or free (n = 8) countermovement jump training. Relative to changes in the control group (1.3 ± 9.2%, mean ± SD), there were clear small improvements in jump height in the assisted (6.7 ± 9.6%) and the resisted jump training group (4.0 ± 8.8%). Elastic band assisted and resisted jump training are both effective methods for improving jump height and can be easily implemented into current training programs via contrast training methods or as a part of plyometric training sessions. Assisted and resisted jump training is recommended for athletes in whom explosive lower-body movements such as jumping and sprinting are performed as part of competition.

AB - Elastic band assisted and resisted jump training may be a novel way to develop lower-body power. The purpose of this investigation was to (a) determine the kinetic differences between assisted, free, and resisted countermovement jumps and (b), investigate the effects of contrast training using either assisted, free, or resisted countermovement jump training on vertical jump performance in well-trained athletes. In part 1, 8 recreationally trained men were assessed for force output, relative peak power (PP·kg(-1)) and peak velocity during the 3 types of jump. The highest peak force was achieved in the resisted jump method, while PP·kg(-1) and peak velocity were greatest in the assisted jump. Each type of jump produced a different pattern of maximal values of the variables measured, which may have implications for developing separate components of muscular power. In part 2, 28 professional rugby players were assessed for vertical jump height before and after 4 weeks of either assisted (n = 9), resisted (n = 11), or free (n = 8) countermovement jump training. Relative to changes in the control group (1.3 ± 9.2%, mean ± SD), there were clear small improvements in jump height in the assisted (6.7 ± 9.6%) and the resisted jump training group (4.0 ± 8.8%). Elastic band assisted and resisted jump training are both effective methods for improving jump height and can be easily implemented into current training programs via contrast training methods or as a part of plyometric training sessions. Assisted and resisted jump training is recommended for athletes in whom explosive lower-body movements such as jumping and sprinting are performed as part of competition.

U2 - 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181f6b0f4

DO - 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181f6b0f4

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 2219

EP - 2227

JO - Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research

JF - Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research

SN - 1064-8011

IS - 8

ER -