Justice remembered

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Extract: Allan Beever has written a book about justice. 1 It is also, less obviously, a book about memory. The central claim of the book, as the title suggests, is that there is a particular conception of justice to be found in classical authors that has subsequently been forgotten. Beever sets out to uncover this conception and restore it to its proper place in legal and political theory. The idea of forgotten justice is an intriguing one. It makes me wonder: is justice really the kind of thing that can be forgotten? Forgetting justice is not, it seems, like forgetting one's car keys or a book symposium deadline. I will return to this issue below.I would like to begin, however, by examining Beever's methodology. I said that Beever has written a book about justice, but in a way he has written two books.The more substantial book is an exercise in the history of ideas. Beever argues that classical authors such as Plato, Cicero and Thomas Aquinas privilege a particular conception of justice, which he terms commutative justice (79-80). This form ofjustice derives from interpersonal relations. It emphasises interactions between individual people, rather than their relationships to the state or the community as a whole. Commutative justice, in Beever's sense, contrasts with the notion of distributive justice that he argues is strongly emphasised by contemporary political philosophers. Commutative justice, Beever argues, is now largely overlooked: '[i]tis the forgotten justice'
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)145-150
Number of pages6
JournalAustralian Journal of Legal Philosophy
Volume40
Publication statusPublished - 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Justice
Conception
Forgetting
Exercise
Legal Theory
Political philosophers
Interaction
Symposium
Distributive Justice
Thomas Aquinas
Interpersonal Relations
Cicero
Privilege
History of Ideas
Plato
Political Theory
Methodology
Car

Cite this

@article{25644cf949584509a33b0471a9aa41fd,
title = "Justice remembered",
abstract = "Extract: Allan Beever has written a book about justice. 1 It is also, less obviously, a book about memory. The central claim of the book, as the title suggests, is that there is a particular conception of justice to be found in classical authors that has subsequently been forgotten. Beever sets out to uncover this conception and restore it to its proper place in legal and political theory. The idea of forgotten justice is an intriguing one. It makes me wonder: is justice really the kind of thing that can be forgotten? Forgetting justice is not, it seems, like forgetting one's car keys or a book symposium deadline. I will return to this issue below.I would like to begin, however, by examining Beever's methodology. I said that Beever has written a book about justice, but in a way he has written two books.The more substantial book is an exercise in the history of ideas. Beever argues that classical authors such as Plato, Cicero and Thomas Aquinas privilege a particular conception of justice, which he terms commutative justice (79-80). This form ofjustice derives from interpersonal relations. It emphasises interactions between individual people, rather than their relationships to the state or the community as a whole. Commutative justice, in Beever's sense, contrasts with the notion of distributive justice that he argues is strongly emphasised by contemporary political philosophers. Commutative justice, Beever argues, is now largely overlooked: '[i]tis the forgotten justice'",
author = "Jonathan Crowe",
year = "2015",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "145--150",
journal = "Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy",
issn = "0726-5239",
publisher = "University of Queensland Press",

}

Justice remembered. / Crowe, Jonathan.

In: Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy, Vol. 40, 2015, p. 145-150.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Justice remembered

AU - Crowe, Jonathan

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Extract: Allan Beever has written a book about justice. 1 It is also, less obviously, a book about memory. The central claim of the book, as the title suggests, is that there is a particular conception of justice to be found in classical authors that has subsequently been forgotten. Beever sets out to uncover this conception and restore it to its proper place in legal and political theory. The idea of forgotten justice is an intriguing one. It makes me wonder: is justice really the kind of thing that can be forgotten? Forgetting justice is not, it seems, like forgetting one's car keys or a book symposium deadline. I will return to this issue below.I would like to begin, however, by examining Beever's methodology. I said that Beever has written a book about justice, but in a way he has written two books.The more substantial book is an exercise in the history of ideas. Beever argues that classical authors such as Plato, Cicero and Thomas Aquinas privilege a particular conception of justice, which he terms commutative justice (79-80). This form ofjustice derives from interpersonal relations. It emphasises interactions between individual people, rather than their relationships to the state or the community as a whole. Commutative justice, in Beever's sense, contrasts with the notion of distributive justice that he argues is strongly emphasised by contemporary political philosophers. Commutative justice, Beever argues, is now largely overlooked: '[i]tis the forgotten justice'

AB - Extract: Allan Beever has written a book about justice. 1 It is also, less obviously, a book about memory. The central claim of the book, as the title suggests, is that there is a particular conception of justice to be found in classical authors that has subsequently been forgotten. Beever sets out to uncover this conception and restore it to its proper place in legal and political theory. The idea of forgotten justice is an intriguing one. It makes me wonder: is justice really the kind of thing that can be forgotten? Forgetting justice is not, it seems, like forgetting one's car keys or a book symposium deadline. I will return to this issue below.I would like to begin, however, by examining Beever's methodology. I said that Beever has written a book about justice, but in a way he has written two books.The more substantial book is an exercise in the history of ideas. Beever argues that classical authors such as Plato, Cicero and Thomas Aquinas privilege a particular conception of justice, which he terms commutative justice (79-80). This form ofjustice derives from interpersonal relations. It emphasises interactions between individual people, rather than their relationships to the state or the community as a whole. Commutative justice, in Beever's sense, contrasts with the notion of distributive justice that he argues is strongly emphasised by contemporary political philosophers. Commutative justice, Beever argues, is now largely overlooked: '[i]tis the forgotten justice'

M3 - Article

VL - 40

SP - 145

EP - 150

JO - Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy

JF - Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy

SN - 0726-5239

ER -