Judgment: Roach v Electoral Commissioner (2007) 233 CLR 162

Dani Larkin; Jonathan Crowe

doi:10.4324/9781003174349

Judgment: Roach v Electoral Commissioner (2007) 233 CLR 162

Dani Larkin
, Jonathan Crowe

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › Research › peer-review

Abstract

The judgment has been rewritten in an Indigenous voice, telling Vicki Roach’s compelling personal story and drawing attention to the disproportionate incarceration rates of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. The judges argue that the exclusion of prisoners from the franchise is disproportionate and therefore constitutionally invalid, regardless of the length of their sentence.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Indigenous Legal Judgments: Bringing Indigenous Voices into Judicial Decision-Making
Editors	Nicole Watson, Heather Douglas
Publisher	Routledge
Chapter	14: Subsection 2
Pages	249-259
ISBN (Electronic)	9781000401219
ISBN (Print)	9780367467456
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003174349
Publication status	Published - 28 Jun 2021

Access to Document

10.4324/9781003174349

Commentary: Roach v Electoral Commissioner (2007) 233 CLR 162
Crowe, J. & Larkin, D., 28 Jun 2021, Indigenous Legal Judgments: Bringing Indigenous Voices into Judicial Decision-Making. Watson, N. & Douglas, H. (eds.). Routledge, p. 245-248
Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › Research › peer-review

Cite this

@inbook{c595803e75ad4ce68a0dafecf6ae487a,

title = "Judgment: Roach v Electoral Commissioner (2007) 233 CLR 162",

abstract = "The judgment has been rewritten in an Indigenous voice, telling Vicki Roach{\textquoteright}s compelling personal story and drawing attention to the disproportionate incarceration rates of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. The judges argue that the exclusion of prisoners from the franchise is disproportionate and therefore constitutionally invalid, regardless of the length of their sentence.",

author = "Dani Larkin and Jonathan Crowe",

year = "2021",

month = jun,

day = "28",

doi = "10.4324/9781003174349",

language = "English",

isbn = "9780367467456",

pages = "249--259",

editor = "Nicole Watson and Heather Douglas",

booktitle = "Indigenous Legal Judgments: Bringing Indigenous Voices into Judicial Decision-Making",

publisher = "Routledge",

address = "United States",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Judgment: Roach v Electoral Commissioner (2007) 233 CLR 162

AU - Larkin, Dani

AU - Crowe, Jonathan

PY - 2021/6/28

Y1 - 2021/6/28

N2 - The judgment has been rewritten in an Indigenous voice, telling Vicki Roach’s compelling personal story and drawing attention to the disproportionate incarceration rates of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. The judges argue that the exclusion of prisoners from the franchise is disproportionate and therefore constitutionally invalid, regardless of the length of their sentence.

AB - The judgment has been rewritten in an Indigenous voice, telling Vicki Roach’s compelling personal story and drawing attention to the disproportionate incarceration rates of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. The judges argue that the exclusion of prisoners from the franchise is disproportionate and therefore constitutionally invalid, regardless of the length of their sentence.

U2 - 10.4324/9781003174349

DO - 10.4324/9781003174349

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9780367467456

SP - 249

EP - 259

BT - Indigenous Legal Judgments: Bringing Indigenous Voices into Judicial Decision-Making

A2 - Watson, Nicole

A2 - Douglas, Heather

PB - Routledge

ER -

Judgment: Roach v Electoral Commissioner (2007) 233 CLR 162

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Related Research Outputs

Commentary: Roach v Electoral Commissioner (2007) 233 CLR 162

Cite this