Abstract
The ways in which postseparation parenting disputes are managed
has undergone significant change in Australia since the Family Law
Act (Cth) was first enacted in 1975. The best interests of children have
always been paramount in children’s cases and over the last 20 years,
this concept has been legislatively shaped to include ongoing beneficial
post separation parental relationships and protection from
harm. A critical piece of evidence to inform a Family Court’s decision
making in such matters is a family report, which is an expert assessment
compiled by a social science professional. The authors report
findings from an Australian based qualitative study exploring the
experiences of family report assessment practice from the perspective
of victim mothers who have separated from men who perpetrate
intimate partner violence. The authors conclude that reforms are
necessary to improve the practice and procedure of family report
writing in Australia. Such reforms should ensure that the lived experience
of victims of intimate partner violence is validated, assessment
processes have victim efficacy, and the outcomes of such reports do
not put women and their children at ongoing risk of harm.
has undergone significant change in Australia since the Family Law
Act (Cth) was first enacted in 1975. The best interests of children have
always been paramount in children’s cases and over the last 20 years,
this concept has been legislatively shaped to include ongoing beneficial
post separation parental relationships and protection from
harm. A critical piece of evidence to inform a Family Court’s decision
making in such matters is a family report, which is an expert assessment
compiled by a social science professional. The authors report
findings from an Australian based qualitative study exploring the
experiences of family report assessment practice from the perspective
of victim mothers who have separated from men who perpetrate
intimate partner violence. The authors conclude that reforms are
necessary to improve the practice and procedure of family report
writing in Australia. Such reforms should ensure that the lived experience
of victims of intimate partner violence is validated, assessment
processes have victim efficacy, and the outcomes of such reports do
not put women and their children at ongoing risk of harm.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 408-440 |
| Number of pages | 33 |
| Journal | Victims and Offenders |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| Early online date | 14 Mar 2019 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 19 May 2019 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of '“It’s Like Standing on a Beach, Holding Your Children’s Hands, and Having a Tsunami Just Coming Towards You”: Intimate Partner Violence and “Expert” Assessments in Australian Family Law'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver