Issues in the Australian differential reporting debate

T. J. Brailsford, A. L. Ramsay

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This article focuses on the differential reporting debate and the approach to differential reporting adopted by the Australian Accounting Research Foundation (AARF). The AARF's approach is outlined and it is argued that it has been developed as part of an overall conceptual framework for general purpose financial reporting. This is contrasted with the ad-hoc approaches to financial reporting requirements found in the United Kingdom, United States and the Australian Corporations Law, in which the application of certain accounting standards and regulations to certain entities is dependent upon some quantitative factor such as size. The article then discusses recent developments surrounding the Corporations Law approach to differential reporting. A number of practical issues on the application of the AARF's differential reporting policy are identified. The article discusses these issues and comments on the direction of research in this area.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)43-58
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation
Volume2
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1993
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Financial reporting
Accounting regulation
Conceptual framework
Factors
Accounting standards
Accounting research
Ad hoc

Cite this

Brailsford, T. J. ; Ramsay, A. L. / Issues in the Australian differential reporting debate. In: Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation. 1993 ; Vol. 2, No. 1. pp. 43-58.
@article{89ee6cb7b04c42678275676375ed83c1,
title = "Issues in the Australian differential reporting debate",
abstract = "This article focuses on the differential reporting debate and the approach to differential reporting adopted by the Australian Accounting Research Foundation (AARF). The AARF's approach is outlined and it is argued that it has been developed as part of an overall conceptual framework for general purpose financial reporting. This is contrasted with the ad-hoc approaches to financial reporting requirements found in the United Kingdom, United States and the Australian Corporations Law, in which the application of certain accounting standards and regulations to certain entities is dependent upon some quantitative factor such as size. The article then discusses recent developments surrounding the Corporations Law approach to differential reporting. A number of practical issues on the application of the AARF's differential reporting policy are identified. The article discusses these issues and comments on the direction of research in this area.",
author = "Brailsford, {T. J.} and Ramsay, {A. L.}",
year = "1993",
doi = "10.1016/1061-9518(93)90014-K",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
pages = "43--58",
journal = "Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation",
issn = "1061-9518",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "1",

}

Issues in the Australian differential reporting debate. / Brailsford, T. J.; Ramsay, A. L.

In: Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Vol. 2, No. 1, 1993, p. 43-58.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Issues in the Australian differential reporting debate

AU - Brailsford, T. J.

AU - Ramsay, A. L.

PY - 1993

Y1 - 1993

N2 - This article focuses on the differential reporting debate and the approach to differential reporting adopted by the Australian Accounting Research Foundation (AARF). The AARF's approach is outlined and it is argued that it has been developed as part of an overall conceptual framework for general purpose financial reporting. This is contrasted with the ad-hoc approaches to financial reporting requirements found in the United Kingdom, United States and the Australian Corporations Law, in which the application of certain accounting standards and regulations to certain entities is dependent upon some quantitative factor such as size. The article then discusses recent developments surrounding the Corporations Law approach to differential reporting. A number of practical issues on the application of the AARF's differential reporting policy are identified. The article discusses these issues and comments on the direction of research in this area.

AB - This article focuses on the differential reporting debate and the approach to differential reporting adopted by the Australian Accounting Research Foundation (AARF). The AARF's approach is outlined and it is argued that it has been developed as part of an overall conceptual framework for general purpose financial reporting. This is contrasted with the ad-hoc approaches to financial reporting requirements found in the United Kingdom, United States and the Australian Corporations Law, in which the application of certain accounting standards and regulations to certain entities is dependent upon some quantitative factor such as size. The article then discusses recent developments surrounding the Corporations Law approach to differential reporting. A number of practical issues on the application of the AARF's differential reporting policy are identified. The article discusses these issues and comments on the direction of research in this area.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=43949173615&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/1061-9518(93)90014-K

DO - 10.1016/1061-9518(93)90014-K

M3 - Article

VL - 2

SP - 43

EP - 58

JO - Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation

JF - Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation

SN - 1061-9518

IS - 1

ER -