Is there a correlation between posterior tibial slope and non-contact anterior cruciate ligament injuries?

Erik Hohmann, Adam L. Bryant, Peter Reaburn, Kevin Tetsworth

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

68 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study was (1) to determine differences in posterior tibial slope (PTS) between subjects who underwent ACL reconstruction following a non-contact ACL injury and a matched control uninjured group and (2) to investigate gender differences between ACL-injured subjects and gender-matched controls. Methods A retrospective chart review was conducted of all 316 ACL-deficient patients at a large regional academic teaching hospital. A control group was established searching the database of the same hospital for subjects who underwent knee radiographs for acute knee complaints with no ACL injury. Subjects (n = 272; males n = 199; females n = 73) were included if a non-contact mechanism could be established. Exclusion criteria included previous ipsilateral knee injury and/or knee previous surgery. PTS was measured on a digitalized lateral radiograph using the axis of the posterior tibial cortex as a reference. Results There was a significant difference (P = 0.008) within the ACL injury group between males and females. There was no significant difference in the PTS angle between those patients with an ACL injury (5.8 ± 3.5 degrees) and the uninjured control group (5.6 ± 3.2 degrees), or between the male ACL injury patients (5.5 ± 3.4) and their control group (5.8 ± 3.1). However, there was a significant difference between the female ACL injury patients (6.7 ± 3.7) and their uninjured control group (5.0 ± 3.4) (P = 0.004). Conclusion The results of this study suggest that increased posterior tibial slope appears to contribute to non-contact ACL injuries in females, but not in males. Level of evidence Case-control study, Level III.

Original languageEnglish
JournalKnee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
Volume19
Issue numberSUPPL1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Control Groups
Knee
Knee Injuries
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries
Teaching Hospitals
Case-Control Studies
Databases

Cite this

@article{8ecd61521ded4b43becb820e2d027372,
title = "Is there a correlation between posterior tibial slope and non-contact anterior cruciate ligament injuries?",
abstract = "Purpose The purpose of this study was (1) to determine differences in posterior tibial slope (PTS) between subjects who underwent ACL reconstruction following a non-contact ACL injury and a matched control uninjured group and (2) to investigate gender differences between ACL-injured subjects and gender-matched controls. Methods A retrospective chart review was conducted of all 316 ACL-deficient patients at a large regional academic teaching hospital. A control group was established searching the database of the same hospital for subjects who underwent knee radiographs for acute knee complaints with no ACL injury. Subjects (n = 272; males n = 199; females n = 73) were included if a non-contact mechanism could be established. Exclusion criteria included previous ipsilateral knee injury and/or knee previous surgery. PTS was measured on a digitalized lateral radiograph using the axis of the posterior tibial cortex as a reference. Results There was a significant difference (P = 0.008) within the ACL injury group between males and females. There was no significant difference in the PTS angle between those patients with an ACL injury (5.8 ± 3.5 degrees) and the uninjured control group (5.6 ± 3.2 degrees), or between the male ACL injury patients (5.5 ± 3.4) and their control group (5.8 ± 3.1). However, there was a significant difference between the female ACL injury patients (6.7 ± 3.7) and their uninjured control group (5.0 ± 3.4) (P = 0.004). Conclusion The results of this study suggest that increased posterior tibial slope appears to contribute to non-contact ACL injuries in females, but not in males. Level of evidence Case-control study, Level III.",
author = "Erik Hohmann and Bryant, {Adam L.} and Peter Reaburn and Kevin Tetsworth",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1007/s00167-011-1547-4",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
journal = "Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy",
issn = "0942-2056",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "SUPPL1",

}

Is there a correlation between posterior tibial slope and non-contact anterior cruciate ligament injuries? / Hohmann, Erik; Bryant, Adam L.; Reaburn, Peter; Tetsworth, Kevin.

In: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, Vol. 19, No. SUPPL1, 2011.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is there a correlation between posterior tibial slope and non-contact anterior cruciate ligament injuries?

AU - Hohmann, Erik

AU - Bryant, Adam L.

AU - Reaburn, Peter

AU - Tetsworth, Kevin

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Purpose The purpose of this study was (1) to determine differences in posterior tibial slope (PTS) between subjects who underwent ACL reconstruction following a non-contact ACL injury and a matched control uninjured group and (2) to investigate gender differences between ACL-injured subjects and gender-matched controls. Methods A retrospective chart review was conducted of all 316 ACL-deficient patients at a large regional academic teaching hospital. A control group was established searching the database of the same hospital for subjects who underwent knee radiographs for acute knee complaints with no ACL injury. Subjects (n = 272; males n = 199; females n = 73) were included if a non-contact mechanism could be established. Exclusion criteria included previous ipsilateral knee injury and/or knee previous surgery. PTS was measured on a digitalized lateral radiograph using the axis of the posterior tibial cortex as a reference. Results There was a significant difference (P = 0.008) within the ACL injury group between males and females. There was no significant difference in the PTS angle between those patients with an ACL injury (5.8 ± 3.5 degrees) and the uninjured control group (5.6 ± 3.2 degrees), or between the male ACL injury patients (5.5 ± 3.4) and their control group (5.8 ± 3.1). However, there was a significant difference between the female ACL injury patients (6.7 ± 3.7) and their uninjured control group (5.0 ± 3.4) (P = 0.004). Conclusion The results of this study suggest that increased posterior tibial slope appears to contribute to non-contact ACL injuries in females, but not in males. Level of evidence Case-control study, Level III.

AB - Purpose The purpose of this study was (1) to determine differences in posterior tibial slope (PTS) between subjects who underwent ACL reconstruction following a non-contact ACL injury and a matched control uninjured group and (2) to investigate gender differences between ACL-injured subjects and gender-matched controls. Methods A retrospective chart review was conducted of all 316 ACL-deficient patients at a large regional academic teaching hospital. A control group was established searching the database of the same hospital for subjects who underwent knee radiographs for acute knee complaints with no ACL injury. Subjects (n = 272; males n = 199; females n = 73) were included if a non-contact mechanism could be established. Exclusion criteria included previous ipsilateral knee injury and/or knee previous surgery. PTS was measured on a digitalized lateral radiograph using the axis of the posterior tibial cortex as a reference. Results There was a significant difference (P = 0.008) within the ACL injury group between males and females. There was no significant difference in the PTS angle between those patients with an ACL injury (5.8 ± 3.5 degrees) and the uninjured control group (5.6 ± 3.2 degrees), or between the male ACL injury patients (5.5 ± 3.4) and their control group (5.8 ± 3.1). However, there was a significant difference between the female ACL injury patients (6.7 ± 3.7) and their uninjured control group (5.0 ± 3.4) (P = 0.004). Conclusion The results of this study suggest that increased posterior tibial slope appears to contribute to non-contact ACL injuries in females, but not in males. Level of evidence Case-control study, Level III.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84862618423&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00167-011-1547-4

DO - 10.1007/s00167-011-1547-4

M3 - Article

VL - 19

JO - Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

JF - Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

SN - 0942-2056

IS - SUPPL1

ER -