Is there a business case for green office buildings? Perspectives of institutional stakeholders in Australia

Lynne Armitage, Lyndon Tan, James Fox

Research output: Contribution to conferenceAbstractResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Whilst buildings are considered one of the largest contributors to climate
change, they also offer major potential for greenhouse gas abatement (Levine et al., 2007). Climate Works Australia (2010) estimates that the built environment has the potential to least cost emissions reductions and that 77% of these emissions reduction opportunities will come from within the commercial sector. It has also calculated that the majority of these emissions reductions are net present value (NPV) positive to investors, even without a carbon price. Eichholtz et al. (2010) suggest that energy represents 30% of operating expenses in a typical office building, and is the single largest and most manageable operating expense in the provision of office space.

Consequently, the built environment and the industry players that create,
occupy and manage it have a vital role to play in limiting the detrimental
effects of climate change and delivering a sustainable outcome in the
future. This responsibility lies not only with developers and builders of green
buildings, but also other important stakeholders such as investors, owneroccupiers, tenants, asset managers, valuers, financiers, governments and
the community. However, a lack of understanding or information available
to these various stakeholders regarding the economic benefits of green
buildings may act as an obstacle to achieving this.

This paper investigates whether there is currently sufficient, reliable
information available to industry participants in Australia to make informed
decisions regarding green buildings and sustainable development.

Methodology: This involves surveying various industry participants across
Australia in order to understand their current knowledge of and views on
the economic benefits and costs of green buildings and comparing these
responses with the empirical evidence gathered to date in Australia and
around the world. Based on this survey of industry participants, the research reveals a buildings, potentially restricting the progress of sustainable development in Australia. This survey concentrates on commercial office buildings only, as most empirical research conducted to date on green buildings has been focused here.

The empirical sample represents the views of many managers and other
stakeholders of major institutional investments who are often not accessible
to academic research.

Keywords: Australia, QLD, Commercial office property, QLD, Sustainable
property investment
Original languageEnglish
Pages100-101
Number of pages2
Publication statusPublished - 8 Jun 2016
EventThe 23rd ERES Annual Conference - Regensburg, Germany
Duration: 8 Jun 201611 Jun 2018
Conference number: 23rd
http://www.eres-2016.com/

Conference

ConferenceThe 23rd ERES Annual Conference
Abbreviated titleERES
CountryGermany
CityRegensburg
Period8/06/1611/06/18
Internet address

Fingerprint

Office buildings
Stakeholders
Business case
Industry
Emission reduction
Green building
Built environment
Managers
Investors
Sustainable development
Expenses
Climate change
Economic benefits
Methodology
Responsibility
Empirical research
Costs
Greenhouse gases
Energy
Net present value

Cite this

Armitage, L., Tan, L., & Fox, J. (2016). Is there a business case for green office buildings? Perspectives of institutional stakeholders in Australia. 100-101. Abstract from The 23rd ERES Annual Conference, Regensburg, Germany.
Armitage, Lynne ; Tan, Lyndon ; Fox, James. / Is there a business case for green office buildings? Perspectives of institutional stakeholders in Australia. Abstract from The 23rd ERES Annual Conference, Regensburg, Germany.2 p.
@conference{7d01709099d84a919428915732d1c9b2,
title = "Is there a business case for green office buildings? Perspectives of institutional stakeholders in Australia",
abstract = "Whilst buildings are considered one of the largest contributors to climatechange, they also offer major potential for greenhouse gas abatement (Levine et al., 2007). Climate Works Australia (2010) estimates that the built environment has the potential to least cost emissions reductions and that 77{\%} of these emissions reduction opportunities will come from within the commercial sector. It has also calculated that the majority of these emissions reductions are net present value (NPV) positive to investors, even without a carbon price. Eichholtz et al. (2010) suggest that energy represents 30{\%} of operating expenses in a typical office building, and is the single largest and most manageable operating expense in the provision of office space.Consequently, the built environment and the industry players that create,occupy and manage it have a vital role to play in limiting the detrimentaleffects of climate change and delivering a sustainable outcome in thefuture. This responsibility lies not only with developers and builders of greenbuildings, but also other important stakeholders such as investors, owneroccupiers, tenants, asset managers, valuers, financiers, governments andthe community. However, a lack of understanding or information availableto these various stakeholders regarding the economic benefits of greenbuildings may act as an obstacle to achieving this.This paper investigates whether there is currently sufficient, reliableinformation available to industry participants in Australia to make informeddecisions regarding green buildings and sustainable development.Methodology: This involves surveying various industry participants acrossAustralia in order to understand their current knowledge of and views onthe economic benefits and costs of green buildings and comparing theseresponses with the empirical evidence gathered to date in Australia andaround the world. Based on this survey of industry participants, the research reveals a buildings, potentially restricting the progress of sustainable development in Australia. This survey concentrates on commercial office buildings only, as most empirical research conducted to date on green buildings has been focused here.The empirical sample represents the views of many managers and otherstakeholders of major institutional investments who are often not accessibleto academic research.Keywords: Australia, QLD, Commercial office property, QLD, Sustainableproperty investment",
author = "Lynne Armitage and Lyndon Tan and James Fox",
year = "2016",
month = "6",
day = "8",
language = "English",
pages = "100--101",
note = "The 23rd ERES Annual Conference, ERES ; Conference date: 08-06-2016 Through 11-06-2018",
url = "http://www.eres-2016.com/",

}

Armitage, L, Tan, L & Fox, J 2016, 'Is there a business case for green office buildings? Perspectives of institutional stakeholders in Australia' The 23rd ERES Annual Conference, Regensburg, Germany, 8/06/16 - 11/06/18, pp. 100-101.

Is there a business case for green office buildings? Perspectives of institutional stakeholders in Australia. / Armitage, Lynne; Tan, Lyndon; Fox, James.

2016. 100-101 Abstract from The 23rd ERES Annual Conference, Regensburg, Germany.

Research output: Contribution to conferenceAbstractResearchpeer-review

TY - CONF

T1 - Is there a business case for green office buildings? Perspectives of institutional stakeholders in Australia

AU - Armitage, Lynne

AU - Tan, Lyndon

AU - Fox, James

PY - 2016/6/8

Y1 - 2016/6/8

N2 - Whilst buildings are considered one of the largest contributors to climatechange, they also offer major potential for greenhouse gas abatement (Levine et al., 2007). Climate Works Australia (2010) estimates that the built environment has the potential to least cost emissions reductions and that 77% of these emissions reduction opportunities will come from within the commercial sector. It has also calculated that the majority of these emissions reductions are net present value (NPV) positive to investors, even without a carbon price. Eichholtz et al. (2010) suggest that energy represents 30% of operating expenses in a typical office building, and is the single largest and most manageable operating expense in the provision of office space.Consequently, the built environment and the industry players that create,occupy and manage it have a vital role to play in limiting the detrimentaleffects of climate change and delivering a sustainable outcome in thefuture. This responsibility lies not only with developers and builders of greenbuildings, but also other important stakeholders such as investors, owneroccupiers, tenants, asset managers, valuers, financiers, governments andthe community. However, a lack of understanding or information availableto these various stakeholders regarding the economic benefits of greenbuildings may act as an obstacle to achieving this.This paper investigates whether there is currently sufficient, reliableinformation available to industry participants in Australia to make informeddecisions regarding green buildings and sustainable development.Methodology: This involves surveying various industry participants acrossAustralia in order to understand their current knowledge of and views onthe economic benefits and costs of green buildings and comparing theseresponses with the empirical evidence gathered to date in Australia andaround the world. Based on this survey of industry participants, the research reveals a buildings, potentially restricting the progress of sustainable development in Australia. This survey concentrates on commercial office buildings only, as most empirical research conducted to date on green buildings has been focused here.The empirical sample represents the views of many managers and otherstakeholders of major institutional investments who are often not accessibleto academic research.Keywords: Australia, QLD, Commercial office property, QLD, Sustainableproperty investment

AB - Whilst buildings are considered one of the largest contributors to climatechange, they also offer major potential for greenhouse gas abatement (Levine et al., 2007). Climate Works Australia (2010) estimates that the built environment has the potential to least cost emissions reductions and that 77% of these emissions reduction opportunities will come from within the commercial sector. It has also calculated that the majority of these emissions reductions are net present value (NPV) positive to investors, even without a carbon price. Eichholtz et al. (2010) suggest that energy represents 30% of operating expenses in a typical office building, and is the single largest and most manageable operating expense in the provision of office space.Consequently, the built environment and the industry players that create,occupy and manage it have a vital role to play in limiting the detrimentaleffects of climate change and delivering a sustainable outcome in thefuture. This responsibility lies not only with developers and builders of greenbuildings, but also other important stakeholders such as investors, owneroccupiers, tenants, asset managers, valuers, financiers, governments andthe community. However, a lack of understanding or information availableto these various stakeholders regarding the economic benefits of greenbuildings may act as an obstacle to achieving this.This paper investigates whether there is currently sufficient, reliableinformation available to industry participants in Australia to make informeddecisions regarding green buildings and sustainable development.Methodology: This involves surveying various industry participants acrossAustralia in order to understand their current knowledge of and views onthe economic benefits and costs of green buildings and comparing theseresponses with the empirical evidence gathered to date in Australia andaround the world. Based on this survey of industry participants, the research reveals a buildings, potentially restricting the progress of sustainable development in Australia. This survey concentrates on commercial office buildings only, as most empirical research conducted to date on green buildings has been focused here.The empirical sample represents the views of many managers and otherstakeholders of major institutional investments who are often not accessibleto academic research.Keywords: Australia, QLD, Commercial office property, QLD, Sustainableproperty investment

UR - http://www.eres-2016.com/

M3 - Abstract

SP - 100

EP - 101

ER -

Armitage L, Tan L, Fox J. Is there a business case for green office buildings? Perspectives of institutional stakeholders in Australia. 2016. Abstract from The 23rd ERES Annual Conference, Regensburg, Germany.