Abstract
The article by Pfeifer and Strunk on psychotherapy process research offers a highly thoughtful review on the state of psychotherapy process research in cognitive therapy for depression, and the inherent challenges in establishing causal relationships between process and outcomes. In this commentary, I argue that the goal of internal validity in psychotherapy process research may be unattainable, and possibly unnecessary. Finally, I suggest that psychotherapy process research should shift from "does it affect change?" to "how does it affect change?", "when does it affect change?", and "for whom does it affect change?".
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 418-420 |
| Number of pages | 3 |
| Journal | Australian Psychologist |
| Volume | 50 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs |
|
| Publication status | Published - Dec 2015 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Is the Impact of Psychotherapy Processes on Outcomes Already Quacking and Waddling? Comment "A Primer on Psychotherapy Process Research (Pfeifer & Strunk, 2015)"'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver