Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Is the Impact of Psychotherapy Processes on Outcomes Already Quacking and Waddling? Comment "A Primer on Psychotherapy Process Research (Pfeifer & Strunk, 2015)"

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate/opinionResearch

Abstract

The article by Pfeifer and Strunk on psychotherapy process research offers a highly thoughtful review on the state of psychotherapy process research in cognitive therapy for depression, and the inherent challenges in establishing causal relationships between process and outcomes. In this commentary, I argue that the goal of internal validity in psychotherapy process research may be unattainable, and possibly unnecessary. Finally, I suggest that psychotherapy process research should shift from "does it affect change?" to "how does it affect change?", "when does it affect change?", and "for whom does it affect change?".

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)418-420
Number of pages3
JournalAustralian Psychologist
Volume50
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Is the Impact of Psychotherapy Processes on Outcomes Already Quacking and Waddling? Comment "A Primer on Psychotherapy Process Research (Pfeifer & Strunk, 2015)"'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this