Is rural medicine a separate discipline?

Janie D. Smith*, Richard Hays

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The Australian College of Rural and Remote Medicine was established in 1997 to meet what rural doctors perceived as their unmet educational and professional needs. However, the issue of just how different rural practice is from urban practice remains a topic of debate. Methods: This paper explores the scope of rural medical practice, through the use of clinical scenarios and a synthesis of the research literature, to determine if rural medical practice is emerging as a distinct discipline in Australia. Conclusion: Rural and remote medical practice is different, and additional, to urban practice, in the context, content and process of care. Three of the four criteria for determining rural medical practice as a distinct discipline exist in Australia. The fourth criteria: sufficient external recognition of rural medicine as a distinct discipline, awaits resolution.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)67-72
Number of pages6
JournalAustralian Journal of Rural Health
Volume12
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Is rural medicine a separate discipline?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this