Is depression "evolutionary" or just "adaptive"? A comment

Christopher F. Sharpley, Vicki Bitsika

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleResearchpeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Some recent explanations of depression have suggested that it may be "evolutionary" in that there are advantages to the depressed individual which arise from some aspects of depressive symptomatology. While the depressive behaviour of withdrawal from the adverse environment may provide some immediate benefits to the depressed individual, thus making it potentially "adaptive" in the short-term, this does not fit the biological definition of "evolutionary". In fact, depression does not meet two of the three required criteria from natural selection in order to be evolutionary. Therefore, while some depressive behaviour may be advantageous for the depressed individual, and is therefore "adaptive" in an immediate sense, it cannot be accurately described as "evolutionary". Implications for research and clinical practice are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Article number631502
JournalDepression Research and Treatment
Volume2010
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Fingerprint

Genetic Selection
Research

Cite this

Sharpley, Christopher F. ; Bitsika, Vicki. / Is depression "evolutionary" or just "adaptive"? A comment. In: Depression Research and Treatment. 2010 ; Vol. 2010.
@article{c4d5fb72d5ec49729ff607130313145d,
title = "Is depression {"}evolutionary{"} or just {"}adaptive{"}? A comment",
abstract = "Some recent explanations of depression have suggested that it may be {"}evolutionary{"} in that there are advantages to the depressed individual which arise from some aspects of depressive symptomatology. While the depressive behaviour of withdrawal from the adverse environment may provide some immediate benefits to the depressed individual, thus making it potentially {"}adaptive{"} in the short-term, this does not fit the biological definition of {"}evolutionary{"}. In fact, depression does not meet two of the three required criteria from natural selection in order to be evolutionary. Therefore, while some depressive behaviour may be advantageous for the depressed individual, and is therefore {"}adaptive{"} in an immediate sense, it cannot be accurately described as {"}evolutionary{"}. Implications for research and clinical practice are discussed.",
author = "Sharpley, {Christopher F.} and Vicki Bitsika",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1155/2010/631502",
language = "English",
volume = "2010",
journal = "Depression Research and Treatment",
issn = "2090-1321",
publisher = "Hindawi Publishing Corporation",

}

Is depression "evolutionary" or just "adaptive"? A comment. / Sharpley, Christopher F.; Bitsika, Vicki.

In: Depression Research and Treatment, Vol. 2010, 631502, 2010.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is depression "evolutionary" or just "adaptive"? A comment

AU - Sharpley, Christopher F.

AU - Bitsika, Vicki

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Some recent explanations of depression have suggested that it may be "evolutionary" in that there are advantages to the depressed individual which arise from some aspects of depressive symptomatology. While the depressive behaviour of withdrawal from the adverse environment may provide some immediate benefits to the depressed individual, thus making it potentially "adaptive" in the short-term, this does not fit the biological definition of "evolutionary". In fact, depression does not meet two of the three required criteria from natural selection in order to be evolutionary. Therefore, while some depressive behaviour may be advantageous for the depressed individual, and is therefore "adaptive" in an immediate sense, it cannot be accurately described as "evolutionary". Implications for research and clinical practice are discussed.

AB - Some recent explanations of depression have suggested that it may be "evolutionary" in that there are advantages to the depressed individual which arise from some aspects of depressive symptomatology. While the depressive behaviour of withdrawal from the adverse environment may provide some immediate benefits to the depressed individual, thus making it potentially "adaptive" in the short-term, this does not fit the biological definition of "evolutionary". In fact, depression does not meet two of the three required criteria from natural selection in order to be evolutionary. Therefore, while some depressive behaviour may be advantageous for the depressed individual, and is therefore "adaptive" in an immediate sense, it cannot be accurately described as "evolutionary". Implications for research and clinical practice are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78650821980&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1155/2010/631502

DO - 10.1155/2010/631502

M3 - Review article

VL - 2010

JO - Depression Research and Treatment

JF - Depression Research and Treatment

SN - 2090-1321

M1 - 631502

ER -