Is comfort food really good for the soul? A replication of Troisi and Gabriel's (2011) Study 2

Lay See Ong, Hans IJzerman, Angela K Y Leung

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We report the results of three high-powered replications of Troisi and Gabriel's (2011) idea that writing about comfort food reduces feelings of loneliness amongst securely attached individuals after a belongingness threat. We conducted our studies amongst a large group of participants (Total N = 649) amongst American (MTurk), Dutch (Tilburg University; TiU), and Singaporean (Singapore Management University; SMU) samples. Participants first completed an attachment style scale, followed by writing two essays for manipulating a sense of belongingness and salience of comfort food, and then reporting their loneliness levels. We did not confirm the overall effect over all three countries. However, exploratory results provide the preliminary suggestion that (1) the comfort food explanation likely holds amongst the American samples (including Troisi and Gabriel's), but not amongst the TiU and SMU samples, and potentially that (2) the TiU and SMU participants self-regulate through warmer (vs. colder) temperature foods. Both of these should be regarded with great caution as these analyses were exploratory, and because the Ns for the different temperature foods were small. We suspect we have uncovered first cross-cultural differences in self-regulation through food, but further confirmatory work is required to understand the cultural significance of comfort food for self-regulation.

Original languageEnglish
Article number314
JournalFrontiers in Psychology
Volume6
Issue numberAPR
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Food
Loneliness
Singapore
Emotions
Temperature
Self-Control

Cite this

Ong, Lay See ; IJzerman, Hans ; Leung, Angela K Y. / Is comfort food really good for the soul? A replication of Troisi and Gabriel's (2011) Study 2. In: Frontiers in Psychology. 2015 ; Vol. 6, No. APR.
@article{4da4a11d43d248d094895a6cd680fdc0,
title = "Is comfort food really good for the soul? A replication of Troisi and Gabriel's (2011) Study 2",
abstract = "We report the results of three high-powered replications of Troisi and Gabriel's (2011) idea that writing about comfort food reduces feelings of loneliness amongst securely attached individuals after a belongingness threat. We conducted our studies amongst a large group of participants (Total N = 649) amongst American (MTurk), Dutch (Tilburg University; TiU), and Singaporean (Singapore Management University; SMU) samples. Participants first completed an attachment style scale, followed by writing two essays for manipulating a sense of belongingness and salience of comfort food, and then reporting their loneliness levels. We did not confirm the overall effect over all three countries. However, exploratory results provide the preliminary suggestion that (1) the comfort food explanation likely holds amongst the American samples (including Troisi and Gabriel's), but not amongst the TiU and SMU samples, and potentially that (2) the TiU and SMU participants self-regulate through warmer (vs. colder) temperature foods. Both of these should be regarded with great caution as these analyses were exploratory, and because the Ns for the different temperature foods were small. We suspect we have uncovered first cross-cultural differences in self-regulation through food, but further confirmatory work is required to understand the cultural significance of comfort food for self-regulation.",
author = "Ong, {Lay See} and Hans IJzerman and Leung, {Angela K Y}",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00314",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
journal = "Frontiers in Psychology",
issn = "1664-1078",
publisher = "Frontiers Media SA",
number = "APR",

}

Is comfort food really good for the soul? A replication of Troisi and Gabriel's (2011) Study 2. / Ong, Lay See; IJzerman, Hans; Leung, Angela K Y.

In: Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 6, No. APR, 314, 2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is comfort food really good for the soul? A replication of Troisi and Gabriel's (2011) Study 2

AU - Ong, Lay See

AU - IJzerman, Hans

AU - Leung, Angela K Y

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - We report the results of three high-powered replications of Troisi and Gabriel's (2011) idea that writing about comfort food reduces feelings of loneliness amongst securely attached individuals after a belongingness threat. We conducted our studies amongst a large group of participants (Total N = 649) amongst American (MTurk), Dutch (Tilburg University; TiU), and Singaporean (Singapore Management University; SMU) samples. Participants first completed an attachment style scale, followed by writing two essays for manipulating a sense of belongingness and salience of comfort food, and then reporting their loneliness levels. We did not confirm the overall effect over all three countries. However, exploratory results provide the preliminary suggestion that (1) the comfort food explanation likely holds amongst the American samples (including Troisi and Gabriel's), but not amongst the TiU and SMU samples, and potentially that (2) the TiU and SMU participants self-regulate through warmer (vs. colder) temperature foods. Both of these should be regarded with great caution as these analyses were exploratory, and because the Ns for the different temperature foods were small. We suspect we have uncovered first cross-cultural differences in self-regulation through food, but further confirmatory work is required to understand the cultural significance of comfort food for self-regulation.

AB - We report the results of three high-powered replications of Troisi and Gabriel's (2011) idea that writing about comfort food reduces feelings of loneliness amongst securely attached individuals after a belongingness threat. We conducted our studies amongst a large group of participants (Total N = 649) amongst American (MTurk), Dutch (Tilburg University; TiU), and Singaporean (Singapore Management University; SMU) samples. Participants first completed an attachment style scale, followed by writing two essays for manipulating a sense of belongingness and salience of comfort food, and then reporting their loneliness levels. We did not confirm the overall effect over all three countries. However, exploratory results provide the preliminary suggestion that (1) the comfort food explanation likely holds amongst the American samples (including Troisi and Gabriel's), but not amongst the TiU and SMU samples, and potentially that (2) the TiU and SMU participants self-regulate through warmer (vs. colder) temperature foods. Both of these should be regarded with great caution as these analyses were exploratory, and because the Ns for the different temperature foods were small. We suspect we have uncovered first cross-cultural differences in self-regulation through food, but further confirmatory work is required to understand the cultural significance of comfort food for self-regulation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84930679300&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00314

DO - 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00314

M3 - Article

VL - 6

JO - Frontiers in Psychology

JF - Frontiers in Psychology

SN - 1664-1078

IS - APR

M1 - 314

ER -