Is cardiovascular or resistance exercise better to treat patients with depression¿ a narrative review

Robert Stanton, Peter Reaburn, Brenda Happell

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleResearchpeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: There is growing evidence regarding the efficacy of exercise as a treatment strategy for patients with depression. This paper summarises the benefits of both cardiovascular and resistance exercise for patients with depression. Design: A narrative review design was employed. Supporting literature for the individual and combined benefits of both modalities are presented. Studies comparing both modalities are then discussed. Results: The outcomes of the review indicate that there is evidence for the efficacy of both cardiovascular exercise and resistance exercise, either independently or combined, in the treatment of depression across the range of severity levels and age groups. Conclusion: Exercise interventions for the treatment of depression appear worthwhile and well tolerated. Exercise preference, access to resources and social support may shape the choice for the patient. The role of primary and allied health professionals in guiding this choice is discussed. Implications for clinical practice and further research are presented.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)531-538
Number of pages8
JournalIssues in Mental Health Nursing
Volume34
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Exercise
Allied Health Personnel
Social Support
Therapeutics
Age Groups
Research

Cite this

@article{7aa7925f22a04de4a11d2ecb0e255bf0,
title = "Is cardiovascular or resistance exercise better to treat patients with depression¿ a narrative review",
abstract = "Objectives: There is growing evidence regarding the efficacy of exercise as a treatment strategy for patients with depression. This paper summarises the benefits of both cardiovascular and resistance exercise for patients with depression. Design: A narrative review design was employed. Supporting literature for the individual and combined benefits of both modalities are presented. Studies comparing both modalities are then discussed. Results: The outcomes of the review indicate that there is evidence for the efficacy of both cardiovascular exercise and resistance exercise, either independently or combined, in the treatment of depression across the range of severity levels and age groups. Conclusion: Exercise interventions for the treatment of depression appear worthwhile and well tolerated. Exercise preference, access to resources and social support may shape the choice for the patient. The role of primary and allied health professionals in guiding this choice is discussed. Implications for clinical practice and further research are presented.",
author = "Robert Stanton and Peter Reaburn and Brenda Happell",
year = "2013",
month = "7",
doi = "10.3109/01612840.2013.774077",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "531--538",
journal = "Issues in Mental Health Nursing",
issn = "0161-2840",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare USA",
number = "7",

}

Is cardiovascular or resistance exercise better to treat patients with depression¿ a narrative review. / Stanton, Robert; Reaburn, Peter; Happell, Brenda.

In: Issues in Mental Health Nursing, Vol. 34, No. 7, 07.2013, p. 531-538.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is cardiovascular or resistance exercise better to treat patients with depression¿ a narrative review

AU - Stanton, Robert

AU - Reaburn, Peter

AU - Happell, Brenda

PY - 2013/7

Y1 - 2013/7

N2 - Objectives: There is growing evidence regarding the efficacy of exercise as a treatment strategy for patients with depression. This paper summarises the benefits of both cardiovascular and resistance exercise for patients with depression. Design: A narrative review design was employed. Supporting literature for the individual and combined benefits of both modalities are presented. Studies comparing both modalities are then discussed. Results: The outcomes of the review indicate that there is evidence for the efficacy of both cardiovascular exercise and resistance exercise, either independently or combined, in the treatment of depression across the range of severity levels and age groups. Conclusion: Exercise interventions for the treatment of depression appear worthwhile and well tolerated. Exercise preference, access to resources and social support may shape the choice for the patient. The role of primary and allied health professionals in guiding this choice is discussed. Implications for clinical practice and further research are presented.

AB - Objectives: There is growing evidence regarding the efficacy of exercise as a treatment strategy for patients with depression. This paper summarises the benefits of both cardiovascular and resistance exercise for patients with depression. Design: A narrative review design was employed. Supporting literature for the individual and combined benefits of both modalities are presented. Studies comparing both modalities are then discussed. Results: The outcomes of the review indicate that there is evidence for the efficacy of both cardiovascular exercise and resistance exercise, either independently or combined, in the treatment of depression across the range of severity levels and age groups. Conclusion: Exercise interventions for the treatment of depression appear worthwhile and well tolerated. Exercise preference, access to resources and social support may shape the choice for the patient. The role of primary and allied health professionals in guiding this choice is discussed. Implications for clinical practice and further research are presented.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84880714932&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3109/01612840.2013.774077

DO - 10.3109/01612840.2013.774077

M3 - Review article

VL - 34

SP - 531

EP - 538

JO - Issues in Mental Health Nursing

JF - Issues in Mental Health Nursing

SN - 0161-2840

IS - 7

ER -