Iron infusion and newer intravenous iron formulations

  • Tim Aung*
  • , Sandy T. Aung
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalLetterResearchpeer-review

6 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

To the Editor:
Iron deficiency (ID) and ID anemia (IDA) are common health problems worldwide. The World Health Organization (2011) estimated that 34% of the global population (>2 billion) is affected by anemia and that the most common type was ID (50% of total anemia), which primarily affects women of reproductive age.[1] Although intravenous (IV) iron has been used to treat ID and IDA for more than six decades, its use in primary care settings has been infrequent compared with its use in tertiary centers due to the historical concern of anaphylaxis, among others. The newer (non-dextran) IV formulations, which allow complete or near-complete replacement in a single sitting of 15 to 30 min, have an improved safety profile, and better tolerability, efficacy, and effectiveness compared with oral iron therapy. They are suited for administration in the primary care or community practices in a proper setting. Although oral iron remains the first-line therapy for iron replacement in most guidelines, its common side effects of gastric upset and constipation, and the need to take it regularly for months to replenish iron stores, often result in non-adherence. Intramuscular iron injection is no longer favorable because of pain, skin discoloration and requirement of multiple injections.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1889-1890
Number of pages2
JournalChinese Medical Journal
Volume134
Issue number15
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 5 Aug 2021
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Iron infusion and newer intravenous iron formulations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this