Intimidation, consent and the role of holistic judgments in Australian rape law

Jonathan Crowe, Lara Sveinsson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This article examines the circumstances in which intimidation will vitiate consent to
sex under Australian rape law. It begins by summarising the legislative provisions in
the various Australian jurisdictions, before surveying recent appellate case law.
Existing cases can usefully be grouped into a number of categories based on the kinds
of intimidation involved. There is, however, almost always some degree of overlap
between the various different forms of intimidation and other factors relevant to
determining consent. The article concludes by examining the reasoning process
utilised by the courts in these kinds of cases. It is argued that judges rely heavily on a
holistic assessment of the facts of each case to determine whether consent is legally
effective. This has important consequences for how statutory definitions of rape are
interpreted and applied.
Original languageEnglish
JournalUniversity of Western Australia Law Review
Volume42
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

rape
Law
case law
jurisdiction

Cite this

@article{5536466e96454b9dae93163b33d80c07,
title = "Intimidation, consent and the role of holistic judgments in Australian rape law",
abstract = "This article examines the circumstances in which intimidation will vitiate consent tosex under Australian rape law. It begins by summarising the legislative provisions inthe various Australian jurisdictions, before surveying recent appellate case law.Existing cases can usefully be grouped into a number of categories based on the kindsof intimidation involved. There is, however, almost always some degree of overlapbetween the various different forms of intimidation and other factors relevant todetermining consent. The article concludes by examining the reasoning processutilised by the courts in these kinds of cases. It is argued that judges rely heavily on aholistic assessment of the facts of each case to determine whether consent is legallyeffective. This has important consequences for how statutory definitions of rape areinterpreted and applied.",
author = "Jonathan Crowe and Lara Sveinsson",
year = "2017",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
journal = "University of Western Australia Law Review",
issn = "0042-0328",
publisher = "University of Western Australia",
number = "1",

}

Intimidation, consent and the role of holistic judgments in Australian rape law. / Crowe, Jonathan; Sveinsson, Lara.

In: University of Western Australia Law Review, Vol. 42, No. 1, 2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Intimidation, consent and the role of holistic judgments in Australian rape law

AU - Crowe, Jonathan

AU - Sveinsson, Lara

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - This article examines the circumstances in which intimidation will vitiate consent tosex under Australian rape law. It begins by summarising the legislative provisions inthe various Australian jurisdictions, before surveying recent appellate case law.Existing cases can usefully be grouped into a number of categories based on the kindsof intimidation involved. There is, however, almost always some degree of overlapbetween the various different forms of intimidation and other factors relevant todetermining consent. The article concludes by examining the reasoning processutilised by the courts in these kinds of cases. It is argued that judges rely heavily on aholistic assessment of the facts of each case to determine whether consent is legallyeffective. This has important consequences for how statutory definitions of rape areinterpreted and applied.

AB - This article examines the circumstances in which intimidation will vitiate consent tosex under Australian rape law. It begins by summarising the legislative provisions inthe various Australian jurisdictions, before surveying recent appellate case law.Existing cases can usefully be grouped into a number of categories based on the kindsof intimidation involved. There is, however, almost always some degree of overlapbetween the various different forms of intimidation and other factors relevant todetermining consent. The article concludes by examining the reasoning processutilised by the courts in these kinds of cases. It is argued that judges rely heavily on aholistic assessment of the facts of each case to determine whether consent is legallyeffective. This has important consequences for how statutory definitions of rape areinterpreted and applied.

M3 - Article

VL - 42

JO - University of Western Australia Law Review

JF - University of Western Australia Law Review

SN - 0042-0328

IS - 1

ER -