Interrelationships between trait anxiety, situational stress and mental effort predict phonological processing efficiency, but not effectiveness

Elizabeth J. Edwards, Mark S. Edwards, Michael Lyvers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Attentional control theory (ACT) describes the mechanisms associated with the relationship between anxiety and cognitive performance. We investigated the relationship between cognitive trait anxiety, situational stress and mental effort on phonological performance using a simple (forward-) and complex (backward-) word span task. Ninety undergraduate students participated in the study. Predictor variables were cognitive trait anxiety, indexed using questionnaire scores; situational stress, manipulated using ego threat instructions; and perceived level of mental effort, measured using a visual analogue scale. Criterion variables (a) performance effectiveness (accuracy) and (b) processing efficiency (accuracy divided by response time) were analyzed in separate multiple moderated-regression analyses. The results revealed (a) no relationship between the predictors and performance effectiveness, and (b) a significant 3-way interaction on processing efficiency for both the simple and complex tasks, such that at higher effort, trait anxiety and situational stress did not predict processing efficiency, whereas at lower effort, higher trait anxiety was associated with lower efficiency at high situational stress, but not at low situational stress. Our results were in full support of the assumptions of ACT and implications for future research are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)634-646
Number of pages13
JournalEmotion
Volume16
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2016

Cite this

@article{072bcba19ea648a3889e2a7c16d9d28c,
title = "Interrelationships between trait anxiety, situational stress and mental effort predict phonological processing efficiency, but not effectiveness",
abstract = "Attentional control theory (ACT) describes the mechanisms associated with the relationship between anxiety and cognitive performance. We investigated the relationship between cognitive trait anxiety, situational stress and mental effort on phonological performance using a simple (forward-) and complex (backward-) word span task. Ninety undergraduate students participated in the study. Predictor variables were cognitive trait anxiety, indexed using questionnaire scores; situational stress, manipulated using ego threat instructions; and perceived level of mental effort, measured using a visual analogue scale. Criterion variables (a) performance effectiveness (accuracy) and (b) processing efficiency (accuracy divided by response time) were analyzed in separate multiple moderated-regression analyses. The results revealed (a) no relationship between the predictors and performance effectiveness, and (b) a significant 3-way interaction on processing efficiency for both the simple and complex tasks, such that at higher effort, trait anxiety and situational stress did not predict processing efficiency, whereas at lower effort, higher trait anxiety was associated with lower efficiency at high situational stress, but not at low situational stress. Our results were in full support of the assumptions of ACT and implications for future research are discussed.",
author = "Edwards, {Elizabeth J.} and Edwards, {Mark S.} and Michael Lyvers",
year = "2016",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1037/emo0000138",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "634--646",
journal = "Emotion (Washington, D.C.)",
issn = "1528-3542",
publisher = "AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC",
number = "5",

}

Interrelationships between trait anxiety, situational stress and mental effort predict phonological processing efficiency, but not effectiveness. / Edwards, Elizabeth J.; Edwards, Mark S.; Lyvers, Michael.

In: Emotion, Vol. 16, No. 5, 08.2016, p. 634-646.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interrelationships between trait anxiety, situational stress and mental effort predict phonological processing efficiency, but not effectiveness

AU - Edwards, Elizabeth J.

AU - Edwards, Mark S.

AU - Lyvers, Michael

PY - 2016/8

Y1 - 2016/8

N2 - Attentional control theory (ACT) describes the mechanisms associated with the relationship between anxiety and cognitive performance. We investigated the relationship between cognitive trait anxiety, situational stress and mental effort on phonological performance using a simple (forward-) and complex (backward-) word span task. Ninety undergraduate students participated in the study. Predictor variables were cognitive trait anxiety, indexed using questionnaire scores; situational stress, manipulated using ego threat instructions; and perceived level of mental effort, measured using a visual analogue scale. Criterion variables (a) performance effectiveness (accuracy) and (b) processing efficiency (accuracy divided by response time) were analyzed in separate multiple moderated-regression analyses. The results revealed (a) no relationship between the predictors and performance effectiveness, and (b) a significant 3-way interaction on processing efficiency for both the simple and complex tasks, such that at higher effort, trait anxiety and situational stress did not predict processing efficiency, whereas at lower effort, higher trait anxiety was associated with lower efficiency at high situational stress, but not at low situational stress. Our results were in full support of the assumptions of ACT and implications for future research are discussed.

AB - Attentional control theory (ACT) describes the mechanisms associated with the relationship between anxiety and cognitive performance. We investigated the relationship between cognitive trait anxiety, situational stress and mental effort on phonological performance using a simple (forward-) and complex (backward-) word span task. Ninety undergraduate students participated in the study. Predictor variables were cognitive trait anxiety, indexed using questionnaire scores; situational stress, manipulated using ego threat instructions; and perceived level of mental effort, measured using a visual analogue scale. Criterion variables (a) performance effectiveness (accuracy) and (b) processing efficiency (accuracy divided by response time) were analyzed in separate multiple moderated-regression analyses. The results revealed (a) no relationship between the predictors and performance effectiveness, and (b) a significant 3-way interaction on processing efficiency for both the simple and complex tasks, such that at higher effort, trait anxiety and situational stress did not predict processing efficiency, whereas at lower effort, higher trait anxiety was associated with lower efficiency at high situational stress, but not at low situational stress. Our results were in full support of the assumptions of ACT and implications for future research are discussed.

U2 - 10.1037/emo0000138

DO - 10.1037/emo0000138

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 634

EP - 646

JO - Emotion (Washington, D.C.)

JF - Emotion (Washington, D.C.)

SN - 1528-3542

IS - 5

ER -