Interpreting results and drawing conclusions

Holger J. Schünemann, Gunn E. Vist, Julian P.T. Higgins, Nancy Santesso, Jonathan J. Deeks, Paul Glasziou, Elie A. Akl, Gordon H. Guyatt

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterResearchpeer-review

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This chapter addresses first one of the key aspects of interpreting findings that is also fundamental in completing a ‘Summary of findings’ table: the certainty of evidence related to each of the outcomes. It then provides a more detailed consideration of issues around applicability and around interpretation of numerical results, and provides suggestions for presenting authors’ conclusions. Methods are presented for computing, presenting and interpreting relative and absolute effects for dichotomous outcome data, including the number needed to treat. For continuous outcome measures, review authors can present summary results for studies using natural units of measurement or as minimal important differences when all studies use the same scale. When studies measure the same construct but with different scales, review authors will need to find a way to interpret the standardized mean difference, or to use an alternative effect measure for the meta-analysis such as the ratio of means.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationCochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions
EditorsJulian P.T. Higgins, James Thomas, Jacqueline Chandler, Miranda Cumpston, Tianjing Li, Matthew J. Page, Vivian A. Welch
PublisherWiley-Blackwell
Chapter15
Pages403-431
Number of pages29
Edition2nd
ISBN (Electronic)9781119536604
ISBN (Print)9781119536628
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Interpreting results and drawing conclusions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this