Inter‐firm Migration of Tacit Knowledge: Law and Policy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)
31 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Much knowledge is diffused by the exchange of property rights in intangibles. But tacit knowledge, not being subject to property rights, is instead diffused by migration of knowledgeable individuals between firms. The law impacts significantly on this diffusion mechanism, in particular those rules that determine the use individuals may make of their tacit knowledge after migration to a different firm. The general principle underlying the relevant law is that individuals are free to migrate with all their tacit knowledge. Nonetheless there are some narrow exceptions to this principle. That these exceptions remain narrow and carefully policed by the courts is important because imposing too many restraints on use of tacit knowledge post‐term would have a negative impact on real innovation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)285-306
Number of pages22
JournalPrometheus
Volume23
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 2005

Fingerprint

migration
right of ownership
Law
property rights
firm
innovation
policy
court
right of property

Cite this

@article{4abd721962704d57971379a6f9a5b125,
title = "Inter‐firm Migration of Tacit Knowledge: Law and Policy",
abstract = "Much knowledge is diffused by the exchange of property rights in intangibles. But tacit knowledge, not being subject to property rights, is instead diffused by migration of knowledgeable individuals between firms. The law impacts significantly on this diffusion mechanism, in particular those rules that determine the use individuals may make of their tacit knowledge after migration to a different firm. The general principle underlying the relevant law is that individuals are free to migrate with all their tacit knowledge. Nonetheless there are some narrow exceptions to this principle. That these exceptions remain narrow and carefully policed by the courts is important because imposing too many restraints on use of tacit knowledge post‐term would have a negative impact on real innovation.",
author = "{van Caenegem}, William",
year = "2005",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/08109020500210951",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "285--306",
journal = "Prometheus",
issn = "0810-9028",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

Inter‐firm Migration of Tacit Knowledge : Law and Policy. / van Caenegem, William.

In: Prometheus, Vol. 23, No. 3, 01.09.2005, p. 285-306.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Inter‐firm Migration of Tacit Knowledge

T2 - Law and Policy

AU - van Caenegem, William

PY - 2005/9/1

Y1 - 2005/9/1

N2 - Much knowledge is diffused by the exchange of property rights in intangibles. But tacit knowledge, not being subject to property rights, is instead diffused by migration of knowledgeable individuals between firms. The law impacts significantly on this diffusion mechanism, in particular those rules that determine the use individuals may make of their tacit knowledge after migration to a different firm. The general principle underlying the relevant law is that individuals are free to migrate with all their tacit knowledge. Nonetheless there are some narrow exceptions to this principle. That these exceptions remain narrow and carefully policed by the courts is important because imposing too many restraints on use of tacit knowledge post‐term would have a negative impact on real innovation.

AB - Much knowledge is diffused by the exchange of property rights in intangibles. But tacit knowledge, not being subject to property rights, is instead diffused by migration of knowledgeable individuals between firms. The law impacts significantly on this diffusion mechanism, in particular those rules that determine the use individuals may make of their tacit knowledge after migration to a different firm. The general principle underlying the relevant law is that individuals are free to migrate with all their tacit knowledge. Nonetheless there are some narrow exceptions to this principle. That these exceptions remain narrow and carefully policed by the courts is important because imposing too many restraints on use of tacit knowledge post‐term would have a negative impact on real innovation.

U2 - 10.1080/08109020500210951

DO - 10.1080/08109020500210951

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 285

EP - 306

JO - Prometheus

JF - Prometheus

SN - 0810-9028

IS - 3

ER -